Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

freakin' hall!

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

Dam give me $2M a year I'll call a game as good as what was called tonight!

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

Whats up with the non-call on the DB hitting our WR late??

You know ST would have drawn that call.

BS.

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

What would make them think that he could make that kick? That was a poor coaching decision. I don't care if it was only 48 yards.

For some unknown f-ing reason Gibbs loves John Hall when all Hall has done is screwed up. This is bullshit.

100 million dollars and there isn't one good f-ing kicker on the whole goddamned team.

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

[QUOTE=Grim21Reaper;213988]What would make them think that he could make that kick? That was a poor coaching decision. I don't care if it was only 48 yards.

For some unknown f-ing reason Gibbs loves John Hall when all Hall has done is screwed up. This is bullshit.

100 million dollars and there isn't one good f-ing kicker on the whole goddamned team.[/QUOTE]

It was fourth down, what do you think we were supposed to have done?

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

Rumph sucks, Hall sucks...that was the game

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

defensive secondary was abysmal. archuleta was nowhere except for penalties or getting his ass lit on fire. john hall needs to get his ass cut

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

The game came down to these two things:

1) Too many missed redzone opportunities by our offense.

2) Too many 3rd down conversions given up on defense.

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

Apparently Gibbs was concerned for a reason considering the preseason. Greg Williams also said that he is concerned about the defense. Looks like he had reason as well. Well, we have 6 days to prepare for Dallas. Good luck to us. We gotta play better. Kudos to Minn though, they played better than everyone thought they would. They are a real contender in their division.

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

Johnson, Williamson, Robinson, and Wiggins lit up this secondary. Even with the drops. Well now we have Bledsoe, T.O., Glenn, and Whitten. Be afraid...

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

[quote=skinsguy;213991]It was fourth down, what do you think we were supposed to have done?[/quote]

run it...get the first, spike the ball, throw it downfield....wow, give me 20 million dollars now...oh yeah, cut hall, I should be in the hall of fame

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

I was expecting a much better performance but I'm a little dissapointed, espically in the defense. We've got a lot of improving to do.

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

Put campbell in and let him scramble and move the pocket.Screw brunnell and his manage the game bullshit.It gets you field goals and losses.Time to go with the future.

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

I can't say I think anything of that mess some might call a game is Brunell's fault...he threw 0 interceptions, and I believe wasn't even sacked. The defense looked like they're all ready for a retirement community, and the offense just didn't get it done in the redzone.

Two things to think about for next week though:

1. Portis will start and get a lot of carries

2: Springs will shore up the other side of the field

Re: 9/11/2006: Redskins (0-0) vs. Vikings (0-0)
 

[quote=AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace;214028]I can't say I think anything of that mess some might call a game is Brunell's fault...he threw 0 interceptions, and I believe wasn't even sacked. The defense looked like they're all ready for a retirement community, and the offense just didn't get it done in the redzone.

Two things to think about for next week though:

1. Portis will start and get a lot of carries

2: Springs will shore up the other side of the field[/quote]

Portis looked good. I don't think Springs will be on the field.