Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

What a stupid list...would expect teams that want him to say they do? Everyone is evaluating the pros and cons of having TO on their team.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=53Fan;534521]Williams is talented but I don't know about a monster year. Cooley is as good as Witten if not better. IMO.[/quote]

If he can have 1200 yards in Detroit he will have a huge year as the #1 receiver in Dallas.

Cooley is right there with Witten as a pass catcher and ball carrier (maybe a shade better) but he isn't near the blocker that Witten is.

Witten can shut down our ends without help, at least he could before the big boy showed up!

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3954188]Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN[/url]

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=Redskins8588;534541]On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

[URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3954188"]Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN[/URL][/quote]

I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=GMScud;534542]I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.[/quote]

I agree that we are probably not going to go after a WR, but if we did I wouldn't mind Holt coming in and helping the younger guys and take some pressure off of Moss...

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

I don't think Holt would be cheap but he is a hell of a receiver. I heard someone say after what Housh and Coles got, Holt thinks he could get a good contract too.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=FRPLG;534548]I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.[/quote]

Make that 14.02%.

I wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

Apparently there are some GM's in the league who share the same genetic defect or that POS SIDE- SHOW called T.O. would have been out of the league a few years ago.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=GMScud;534551]Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.[/quote]

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

Holt over TO anyday!!!!!! Holt is the consumate professional. I know it is unlikely we will go for him, but he might be a decent grab if the money isn't too steep, but of course it will probably be since the Haynesworth deal.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;534529]If he can have 1200 yards in Detroit he will have a huge year as the #1 receiver in Dallas.

Cooley is right there with Witten as a pass catcher and ball carrier (maybe a shade better) but he isn't near the blocker that Witten is.

Witten can shut down our ends without help, at least he could before the big boy showed up![/quote]


Roy is great, but everything depends on Romo. I think Romo could be in for a bumpy ride in '09.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=GMScud;534551]Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.[/quote]


Funny. TO would piss off Moss and ARE with his antics. I think the Holt angle would be beneficial though.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=44ever;534553]My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.[/quote]


I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

Re: Cowboys cut T.O.
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;534558]I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.[/quote]

I voted no also. Entertained the thought myself. But thats as far as it went.