Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;1214623]Adrian Amos and Eddie Jackson

Bills

Chargers

Eagles

Falcons before Neal got hurt

Jags

Ravens

Saints

Titans

Texans



You still waiting[/QUOTE]



I’m taking about a tandem the Redskins have had


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

D.J. Swearinger released
 

The fact that we have to compare DJ and HHCD to ST and Landry in terms of skills, means we really haven’t had a good safety duo in an extremely long time because DJ is above average and HHCD is fucking terrible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

I still believe Swearinger wasn’t far off from the truth, but you don’t go to the press about this stuff. That being said, look for Manusky to be let go by season’s end.

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=metalskins;1214629]I still believe Swearinger wasn’t far off from the truth, but you don’t go to the press about this stuff. That being said, look for Manusky to be let go by season’s end.[/QUOTE]Todd Bowles, you heard it here first.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=DynamiteRave;1214626]The fact that we have to compare DJ and HHCD to ST and Landry in terms of skills, means we really haven’t had a good safety duo in an extremely long time because DJ is above average and HHCD is fucking terrible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



Exactly. We have had terrible safety tandems since Area 51. God awful terrible safety tandems actually. So now we have a decent Safety in DJ, and since HAHA happens to be paired up with him he is automatically part of some great safety tandem. No. He is one of thee worst defensive starters on our team. Who gives a fuck about loudmouth DJ? Still a ton of changes need to be made in the FO and staff, but getting rid of dipshits (talented or not) is a good place to start.

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=DYoungJelly;1214630]Todd Bowles, you heard it here first.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



I will take Todd Bowles.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[quote=DYoungJelly;1214598]He knew about their reputations when he came here. Should he have cashed their checks?

I'm not a Manusky fan and I think he should be replaced.

But...

There have been many many instances this season, on pivitol plays where Manusky's calls and schemes put DJ and others in the right place at the right time and they (the players) missed a tackle, or went to the wrong place.

Haha missed an interception that would have probably won the Titans game.

DJ has made a ton of great plays but he has missed big tackles and been out of position on coverage too.

[B]Should the coaches cone out and point out all the missed tackles and bad plays by the players as long as it is truthful and accurate? [/B]

Should Manusky have said after the game, "I schemed it up and put a spiral to win the game in HaHa's hands and his drop is making my scheme look bad."

You do know the play DJ was complaining about resulted in an incompletion. Fabian held the dude and it was a penalty.

Should DJ have ripped his team mate for dropping the interception? Or ripped Floyd for dropping the pass that would have set up at least a field goal?

Plenty of criticism to go around my friendand ALL OF IT should stay out of the media.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk[/quote]

Maybe I am not understanding your statement but coaches do this and they should. Every week Gruden calls out players in his presser. He should there is nothing wrong with accountability.

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[quote=metalskins;1214629]I still believe Swearinger wasn’t far off from the truth, but you don’t go to the press about this stuff. That being said, look for Manusky to be let go by season’s end.[/quote]

After this incident I think he stays if Jay stays.

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[quote=DYoungJelly;1214630]Todd Bowles, you heard it here first.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk[/quote]

I’ve been saying that, only if Jets fire him, they might not. If Bowles stays, Tomsula would be an excellent choice.

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=BaltimoreSkins;1214637]Maybe I am not understanding your statement but coaches do this and they should. Every week Gruden calls out players in his presser. He should there is nothing wrong with accountability.[/QUOTE]

No he doesn't. Not at all. He is very protective of his players and coaches.

Gruden always protects his players as much as possible in the media after games.

The lone exception was when RG3 came out and started talking bad about the other players.

Accountability happens in the meeting room not the media.

What good organizations let their players bad mouth coaches and front office through the media? Even if everything is true.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

Well known Gruden is a players coach...I think too a fault.

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[url]https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/redskins/inside-story-redskins-decision-release-dj-swearinger[/url]

A write up by Finley.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

I have one fear.

What if DJ being released (instead of just suspended for the final game) is somewhat of an endorsement of the coaching staff by the FO ?

I mean, if Jay and Manusky were getting canned next week, wouldn't you let it up to the next HC to decide if he wants to deal with a way too loud but overall solid player ?

I hope I'm wrong but, while I think cutting DJ was a painful but appropriate move, pretty much nobody expected that big of a sanction... So isn't it a signal that the FO is supporting the coaching staff?

Simple way to read it would be we got rid of a locker room distraction... but... IDK... I just don't want to be stuck with another year of mediocrity and false hopes...

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

Re: D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=FrenchSkin;1214644]I have one fear.

What if DJ being released (instead of just suspended for the final game) is somewhat of an endorsement of the coaching staff by the FO ?

I mean, if Jay and Manusky were getting canned next week, wouldn't you let it up to the next HC to decide if he wants to deal with a way too loud but overall solid player ?

I hope I'm wrong but, while I think cutting DJ was a painful but appropriate move, pretty much nobody expected that big of a sanction... So isn't it a signal that the FO is supporting the coaching staff?

Simple way to read it would be we got rid of a locker room distraction... but... IDK... I just don't want to be stuck with another year of mediocrity and false hopes...

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



Someone on Twitter said that John Keim pointed out a strong possibility that both Gruden and Allen will be back next season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

D.J. Swearinger released
 

[QUOTE=metalskins;1214645]Someone on Twitter said that John Keim pointed out a strong possibility that both Gruden and Allen will be back next season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



And that’s what upsets me. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, knows Allen, Manusky, and possibly Gruden need to go.

Yet, instead of Snyder removing the root of the problem they’ll simply cut our pro bowl talents who are speaking OF the problems going on behind closed doors. The same problems Foster, Norman, Brown have spoken about..

This front office and coaching staff have NO CREDIBILITY at this point, and they’ve proven that with their record and decisions over the past 5-6 years. Yet their decisions are being trusted to cut the talent we DO have.

It’s like a regime killing off protesters to keep the truth quiet.

You are what your record is, and that’s exactly what Bruce Allen and Gruden are.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk