Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;667334]You say that but they never even won the division. I love the individual pieces but don't you need results to be compared to any of the lines that dominated for a decade?[/quote]
Blowing a hole in the argument that a good line alone will get you there.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=Lotus;667255]For me, McCoy does not impress as an upgrade. So my wish today, barring Bradford, is either:
1st OT Okung
2nd RB Jahvid Best
4th OT Kyle Calloway
5th LB Darryl Sharpton
[B]7th C John Estes[/B]

or

1st OT Okung
2nd OT Charles Brown or Vlad Ducasse
4th RB Montario Hardesty
5th LB Darryl Sharpton
[B]7th C John Estes
[/B]
As with you, every day for me is a new opportunity for a changed opinion. :)[/quote]

you think that he could be a good center for us in the zone blocking scheme?

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=tryfuhl;667403]Blowing a hole in the argument that a good line alone will get you there.[/quote]

I don't think anyone is saying a good o-line alone will get you there anymore than a good QB alone will get you there. If they are, they should probably rethink it.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=tryfuhl;667403]Blowing a hole in the argument that a good line alone will get you there.[/quote]

Whose argument is that?

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

Bradford is not a better prospect than Stafford...sorry.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;667421]you think that he could be a good center for us in the zone blocking scheme?[/quote]

Estes might be. Might not. I think he might be worth a low-round shot.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

So if the Rams take Bradford and the Lions take Okung, then that means one of the two best players in the draft will be on the board when our pick comes in: McCoy or Suh. we'd have no problem trading down, although i'd find it very very hard to pass on either of those guys.

Drafting Suh/McCoy, keeping J Campbell, and drafting an OT at 36 >>>> Drafting Clausen at 4 and an OT at 36.

While there are always good players at the top of the draft, we're garaunteed one of Suh, MCCoy, Okung or Bradford. Hopefully the Rams do us a favor and take Bradford, saving us from ourselves.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;667506]...[B] saving us from ourselves[/B].[/quote]

I hate that phrase.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

he's right tho

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;667506]So if the Rams take Bradford and the Lions take Okung, then that means one of the two best players in the draft will be on the board when our pick comes in: McCoy or Suh. we'd have no problem trading down, although i'd find it very very hard to pass on either of those guys.

Drafting Suh/McCoy, keeping J Campbell, and drafting an OT at 36 >>>> Drafting Clausen at 4 and an OT at 36.

While there are always good players at the top of the draft, we're garaunteed one of Suh, MCCoy, Okung or Bradford. Hopefully the Rams do us a favor and take Bradford, saving us from ourselves.[/quote]

I would put Berry in there as well. As much as is said about him I still think he's undervalued. He has great football instincts, he's smart and he's fast. He has the brains and talent to make any defense better.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=53Fan;667525]I would put Berry in there as well. As much as is said about him I still think he's undervalued. He has great football instincts, he's smart and he's fast. He has the brains and talent to make any defense better.[/quote]

Berrys a great player, and if we didnt have so many more pressing needs, i'd be all for taking him. since there's not much risk we will take him, i doubt anyone would want to trade up to 4 to get him either. he'll probably go somewhere between 5 and 10, so if someone lower down in the draft wants him, they wont have to trade all the way up to 4 to get him.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;667517]I hate that phrase.[/quote]

perhaps i should say, "saving us from the ghost of snyders past," then. however, from what i've read, Allen is a STRONG believer in building through free agency. Unfortunately, in Tampa Bay he was always shackled by the stingiest owners in the NFL. I'm somewhat concerned that Allen will suffer from the same "kid in a candy store" syndrome that Gibbs said he experienced in his first season back in the NFL. Snyders generosity and willingness to spend money on the team is a great thing, but it can also be very harmful when combined with a GM who is "overzealous." Shanahan and Allen need to be aggressive in free agency, but they also need to excersice some restraint. hopefully, they won't make the same mistakes that gibbs 2.0 made.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;667540]perhaps i should say, "saving us from the ghost of snyders past," then. however, from what i've read, Allen is a STRONG believer in building through free agency. Unfortunately, in Tampa Bay he was always shackled by the stingiest owners in the NFL. I'm somewhat concerned that Allen will suffer from the same "kid in a candy store" syndrome that Gibbs said he experienced in his first season back in the NFL. Snyders generosity and willingness to spend money on the team is a great thing, but it can also be very harmful when combined with a GM who is "overzealous." Shanahan and Allen need to be aggressive in free agency, but they also need to excersice some restraint. hopefully, they won't make the same mistakes that gibbs 2.0 made.[/quote]
Good post, and yes I like "ghosts of snyder's past" much better!

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

Has anyone heard or is there any rumors of the Skins trading up to #1 to draft Braford? I'm not crazy about that idea but i have a huge man crush on him.

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;667506]So if the Rams take Bradford and the Lions take Okung, then that means one of the two best players in the draft will be on the board when our pick comes in: McCoy or Suh. we'd have no problem trading down, although i'd find it very very hard to pass on either of those guys.

[B]Drafting Suh/McCoy, keeping J Campbell, and drafting an OT at 36 >>>> Drafting Clausen at 4 and an OT at 36.[/B]

While there are always good players at the top of the draft, we're garaunteed one of Suh, MCCoy, Okung or Bradford. Hopefully the Rams do us a favor and take Bradford, saving us from ourselves.[/quote]

I'm with you. If we can't get our favorite OT or our favorite QB, we should scoop up the elite DT who is left over. If we play our cards right, such a choice would smooth our transition to a 3-4 as well as providing greater value for the #4 pick.