Re: What would it take?
 

Some good news from the Trump administration.

[url]https://gma.yahoo.com/trump-keep-intact-obama-era-order-protecting-lgbtq-123553893--abc-news-topstories.html[/url]


Guess they needed some after the shelling they've been getting the past week.

Re: What would it take?
 

[QUOTE=NC_Skins;1164316]Some good news from the Trump administration.



[url]https://gma.yahoo.com/trump-keep-intact-obama-era-order-protecting-lgbtq-123553893--abc-news-topstories.html[/url]





Guess they needed some after the shelling they've been getting the past week.[/QUOTE]



What a saint. Lol. If you read the fine print it still allows them to drink from the same water fountain or use the same pay phone.

Re: What would it take?
 

Trump has been a supporter of the LGBTQ community since before the election. That said the timing of.this is likely a direct shot at the republicans who are backing off supporting him.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Re: What would it take?
 

If Trump wants to use the presidential bully pulpit then tonight's SCOTUS announcement is just that. You have to think every prolife and prochoice person will be watching. If he wants to speak directly to the whole United States this is his moment.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Re: What would it take?
 

It's gonna be huge, terrific, and big league.

Re: What would it take?
 

Talking about sinking their ship. Are they trying to kill their party? Go from condemning this shit to now supporting it? Based off what event? What facts? They aren't securing shit and they know it.

[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/speaker-defends-trumps-order-warns-protests-162108871--politics.html[/url]

It's going to be a long 4 years.

Re: What would it take?
 

Cant wait for Captain Gay Lover to let us know where Bannon , err um , where he stands on everything.
#thingswillneverbestranger

Re: What would it take?
 

[quote=NC_Skins;1164328]Talking about sinking their ship. Are they trying to kill their party? Go from condemning this shit to now supporting it? Based off what event? What facts? They aren't securing shit and they know it.

[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/speaker-defends-trumps-order-warns-protests-162108871--politics.html[/url]

It's going to be a long 4 years.[/quote]

8

And then Ivanka does 8.

Re: What would it take?
 

I enjoy the fact that green card holders are also barred from entering the US. Nothing says "we don't even trust the other branches of our gov't to properly vet potential immigrants" like banning them in addition to undocumented immigrants. You just know that will be repealed later and then the Dems are gonna eat it up like they made a difference. Meanwhile Trump sits there testing the limits of his powers while distracting us with bullshit.

Re: What would it take?
 

Shocking new!! Protesters are outside the supreme court protesting!
At this rate Trump will be able to say his presidency had the most protesters ever before the first 6 months are over.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Re: What would it take?
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1164357]Shocking new!! Protesters are outside the supreme court protesting!
At this rate Trump will be able to say his presidency had the most protesters ever before the first 6 months are over.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk[/quote]

They have every right to protest. This SCOTUS nomination was outright stolen from Obama. Gerrick Marland should be on the SCOTUS but wasn't even allowed a chance for damn near a year. I hope the Democrats realize now they can't play fair with the GOP, and they'll have to fight fire with fire as shitty as it is.

[url=http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-supreme-court-nomination-20170131-story.html]When the GOP stole Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court seat, they set the stage for a miserable battle - LA Times[/url]

Re: What would it take?
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1164357]Shocking new!! Protesters are outside the supreme court protesting!
At this rate Trump will be able to say his presidency had the most protesters ever before the first 6 months are over.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



As well it should as there has never been such a clueless, vile, insane potus before. [emoji106]

Re: What would it take?
 

[QUOTE=NC_Skins;1164369]They have every right to protest. This SCOTUS nomination was outright stolen from Obama. Gerrick Marland should be on the SCOTUS but wasn't even allowed a chance for damn near a year. I hope the Democrats realize now they can't play fair with the GOP, and they'll have to fight fire with fire as shitty as it is.



[url=http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-supreme-court-nomination-20170131-story.html]When the GOP stole Merrick Garlandâ€[emoji769]s Supreme Court seat, they set the stage for a miserable battle - LA Times[/url][/QUOTE]



It is unreal. Either his supporters, (not you Cred as at least you are aware of the facts[the non- alternative ones]), are just unaware of recent history or completely full of shit. Or both.
They fought Obama for a freaking year, and want the red carpet rolled out immediately for Trumps pick????
I honestly believe that 70% of the people crying about the fight being put up about Trumps pick actually have no idea how this has all unfolded. Only thing worse than a hypocrite is an ignorant hypocrite.

Re: What would it take?
 

Good pick last night, outstanding choice

Re: What would it take?
 

They have every right to protest, but when you protest everything it becomes meaningless.

I agree that the Republicans should have held hearings on Marland. A part of me wanted Trump to nominate him again to make the Democrats and Republicans freak out. (It was a small part of me, and i gave it a cupcake and it wandered off.)

Even had Marland gone to the full Senate, he wouldn't have been confirmed, so it isn't "stolen", but that doesn't minimize the wrong done by the Republicans in not holding hearings.