Re: Pro-gun article
 

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1/p526x296/1781912_765053553512313_1139367863_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Judge upholds Connecticut gun control law passed after Newtown shootings



[url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/31/us-usa-guncontrol-connecticut-idUSBREA0U06H20140131]Judge upholds Connecticut gun control law passed after Newtown shootings | Reuters[/url]


(Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday upheld Connecticut's tough gun control law that was passed in the wake of the deadly 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
The stringent law is constitutional, said the ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Alfred Covello, denying a legal challenge by a group of gun owners.
The state's gun control measures, among the strictest in the nation, were signed into law four months after a gunman in December 2012 killed 26 children and staff in Newtown, Connecticut.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

I am wondering if a certain person will go away if we ignore them? I am starting to think a small group of individuals in here post things for the soul purpose of trying to annoy the masses. I really think the internet allows people who are shunned and outcast in the real world to feel like their existence means something when it does not.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Buffalo Bob;1064337]I am wondering if a certain person will go away if we ignore them? I am starting to think a small group of individuals in here post things for the soul purpose of trying to annoy the masses. I really think the internet allows people who are shunned and outcast in the real world to feel like their existence means something when it does not.[/quote]



Have a nice day .:)

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=7BpCaVoCobxUzM&tbnid=JARVbKg9ULOI5M:&ved=0CAYQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinterest.com%2Fpin%2F273945589807622155%2F&ei=P_smU7T7I4ioyAHUyYCoBg&bvm=bv.62922401,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNEORFEpvvVZuLBR_QXIH_t-lfJdgQ&ust=1395148123805729"][IMG]http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/2a/cc/a5/2acca542bd6b194864260a2cd411ff64.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Monkeydad;1063614]Scored a raincheck on a tough-to-find caliber from Gander Mountain.

They had a weekend sale and since the truck never came, they handed out rainchecks and I got one!

[B]Seriously considering buying a 40 S&W or 45ACP firearm since those calibers are ALWAYS in stock on the ammo shelves.[/B] When I do find mine, there are never hollow points either, just range grade.[/quote]

I went in a Gander Mountain for the first time a week ago as I moved from the West Coast where there are none. I was all excited to see what looked like more ammo that I would normally see in an outdoorsman type store. Of course they had everything but .22's .357's .38's or the 30-30's I was looking for.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1.0-9/1653648_709801435717057_744810289_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[IMG]http://scontent-a-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/1620797_708741239156410_2034580880_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Brainwash the kids first:

[IMG]http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/524560_608141902601301_1164072985_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1064783][IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1.0-9/1653648_709801435717057_744810289_n.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

Clark County Nevada other than Las Vegas is a wide open desert, odd they have a no shooting policy. Odd the sign is shot up, no one disobeys gun laws. Probably people who traveled north from Mexico and can't read English.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1064792]Brainwash the kids first:

[IMG]http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/524560_608141902601301_1164072985_n.jpg[/IMG][/quote]At first I was like, I wonder if they treat the 1st amendment the same way: Right to free speech, except nothing deemed offensive language, and anything related to people's safety and national security. And freedom of association, except those deemed politically incorrect or divisive.... And no, neither amendment should be parsed like the butcher job above.

Then read the line: "provided that they (gun owners) register them".

Holy historical revisionism, Batman!

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Buffalo Bob;1064838]Clark County Nevada other than Las Vegas is a wide open desert, odd they have a no shooting policy. Odd the sign is shot up, no one disobeys gun laws. Probably people who traveled north from Mexico and can't read English.[/quote]


This guy.

[img]http://conservativebyte.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/untitled24.png[/img]

[img]http://tomohalloran.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Obama-pelosi-reid.jpg[/img]




Also, the same guy:
[img]http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Gunclub002_t6531-500x333.jpg[/img]

[img]http://skipmaclure.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/reid_gun.jpg[/img]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1064792]Brainwash the kids first:

[IMG]http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/524560_608141902601301_1164072985_n.jpg[/IMG][/quote]


This horseshit makes me angry. There have been numerous textbooks discovered that have re-worded the Amendment to fit the liberals' idea of what it should be.

Parents have to stay on top of their kids' education so much these days, just to re-teach them the truth.

I'm just happy my cats will never go through this blatant revisionist nonsense.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[IMG]http://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-9/1396055_650799714968909_496895118_n.png[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Is this really what we're all about? :doh:

[IMG]http://wfld.images.worldnow.com/images/24486597_SA.jpg[/IMG]

Isn't that an ad? How much truth do you usually see on one?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Mattyk;1065017]Is this really what we're all about? :doh:

[IMG]http://wfld.images.worldnow.com/images/24486597_SA.jpg[/IMG][/quote]


To some people on this forum , yes .

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/1972451_642880169081934_2120111550_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1064792]Brainwash the kids first:

[IMG]http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/524560_608141902601301_1164072985_n.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

There are bigger problems with how how history is being taught than that. In every major war somehow people think Americans were always the good guys. People believe Americans never did anything bad, even though the US has done more terrible things in its short existence than a lot of other countries have done in millenniums.

I have no problems with guns as long as people are consistent across the board, that includes drugs, speech, and every thing else. People always seem to pick and choose which "rights" should be protected (see Fox News or any major news channel for a prime example).

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065086][IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/1972451_642880169081934_2120111550_n.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

Of course.

It's a pretty rural state.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Mattyk;1065099]Of course.

It's a pretty rural state.[/quote]

There should be absolute carnage! No gun control? Rivers of blood! Ask G1.

[IMG]https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/1484729_755929034441827_299403705_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065086][/quote]


[url=http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/vt/crime/]Vermont crime rates and statistics - NeighborhoodScout[/url]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Mattyk;1065099]Of course.

It's a pretty rural state.[/quote]



Woodstock , Manchester , Dorset .......just beautiful!

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Mattyk;1065017]Is this really what we're all about? :doh:

[IMG]http://wfld.images.worldnow.com/images/24486597_SA.jpg[/IMG][/quote]Is there anything wrong with that advertisement? It's about the same as
[IMG]http://craigyoshihara.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/baseball_hotdog_applepie_chevrolet.jpg[/IMG],
except out of baseball, apple pie, guns, hotdogs, and chevrolet, only one of those items is constitutionally protected.

And maybe some people are still terrified of guns?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Cars kill way more people than guns, and that's not even their primary purpose. Crazy, right?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065137]Cars kill way more people than guns, and that's not even their primary purpose. Crazy, right?[/quote]



I thought we were talking about guns here so to double check I went back to reread my info to see if I was wrong ,nope no cars killed anyone in Newtown on this day anyway so guns did kill more people than cars did ,crazy right ?

[url=http://abcnews.go.com/US/fullpage/newtown-ct-shooting-timeline-sandy-hook-elementary-school-18014080]Newtown, CT Shooting Timeline of Sandy Hook Elementary School | Infographic - ABC News[/url]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

One day? Your stupidity is colossal.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Oregon Woman Stops Intruder with her Handgun, waits 23 minutes for Cops.

[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB2va9cii74#t=21"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB2va9cii74#t=21[/URL]

[I]Her dogs did not stop the intruder. Her home alarm system did not stop the intruder. Not even her “No Trespassing signs” stopped the man who broke into her house. But the moment Lisa Atkin pulled out her handgun the intruder stopped in his tracks.
Then she had to wait 23 minutes for police to arrive at her rural home on that Wednesday morning. So much for the “just call 911 and you will be fine” approach that the anti-gunners want us to take. When seconds count… well, you know the rest.[/I]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065100]There should be absolute carnage! No gun control? Rivers of blood! Ask G1.

[/quote]

Ask me what rocky?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065187]Oregon Woman Stops Intruder with her Handgun, waits 23 minutes for Cops.

[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB2va9cii74#t=21"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB2va9cii74#t=21[/URL]


[I]Then she had to wait 23 minutes for police to arrive at her rural home on that Wednesday morning. .[/I][/quote]


Which in the video she admits is a very quick response considering how far out she lives from the closest town .

And how 'quick' would it have been if she hasn't been armed? At least they'd got there in time to ID the corpse.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065147]One day? Your stupidity is colossal.[/quote]

So your statement on cars was incorrect.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065214]And how 'quick' would it have been if she hasn't been armed? At least they'd got there in time to ID the corpse.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk[/quote]

Nothing I read said anything about him being armed or that he knew she was there so what makes you think he was going to kill her ?

[QUOTE=Giantone;1065215]So your statement on cars was incorrect.[/QUOTE]

Not really, based on averages 89 people were killed that day in car related fatalities.

I can't decide if you are dense or willfully ignorant when you try to justify your aim with skewed statistical methods.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065137]Cars kill way more people than guns, and that's not even their primary purpose. Crazy, right?[/quote]

[quote=GiantOne;1065215]So your statement on cars was incorrect.[/quote]

Here is a graphic of fatalities from guns compared to vehicles. For 100 meaningless points, and no front row season tickets (because I can't afford them like Roddy White can) fill in the blank correctly:

Based on the graphic below, in any year actual data was collected (not projected data), more people were killed by ______?

[IMG]http://www.bloomberg.com/image/iIpduQjKWA.k.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Giantone;1065216]Nothing I read said anything about him being armed or that he knew she was there so what makes you think he was going to kill her ?[/QUOTE]

Yeah, it was a benign break-in.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065223]Yeah, it was a benign break-in.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk[/quote]

Need to ask JR if he could make a counter claim for emotional distress on the burglar's behalf. He had to stare at that gun for 23 minutes! Sue the city and sue her!!!

Serious question, G1. If someone gained entry to your home, what would you do?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Round house to the face directly into the splits, sweep the leg and then the cobra clutch, for me.

#likeaboss

Re: Pro-gun article
 

I might go with a pile driver myself. Gotta set it up first though with a clothesline and then a leg drop across the sternum.