Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

You mean his Wonderlic? Yeah, but it's irrelevant what his score was either time he took it. Ryan Fitzpatrick had close to a 40, better than any starting QB in the league. How many teams would prefer Fitzpatrick as their starter?

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=jgalecpa;473106]Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg[/quote]

Here's a good link that shows Wonderlic scores by QBs over the years.
[url=http://sportsyenta.blogspot.com/2007/02/bring-on-annual-wonderlic-fun.html]Rumors and Rants: Bring On The Annual Wonderlic Fun[/url]

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=jgalecpa;473106]Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg[/quote]

Stupid metric that we have covered too many times. What did you get on your SATs? I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;473111]Stupid metric that we have covered too many times. What did you get on your SATs? I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.[/quote]

Wonderlic or SAT scores huh? How was his 2nd grade math scores more like it, cause he still doesn't know feet or yards..

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=prinzeofmoval;473136]Wonderlic or SAT scores huh? How was his 2nd grade math scores more like it, cause he still doesn't know feet or yards..[/quote]

Wow, that was genius.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

Doesn't matter who you put behind center when the offensive line is breaking down up the middle. And it really doesn't matter who lines up, because the savior will always be the guy holding the clipboard, only if he really was the answer he'd be behind center and not holding a clipboard.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

Campbell didn't have a good game but the idea that what went down yesterday would definitively change your opinion of him is aggressively ass-stupid. He made the same mistakes he has always made while also showing the same physical gifts (at times). 4 years in this is who he has always been. I think he can improve but the game didn't change my opinion of him in any way.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

Okay so we can't be mad for him getting jammed up look at Brett, Tony and Tom last year. The had a miserable time and Jason is no where in their league. But he doesn't have the killer instinct that we need in a quarterback. I don't see Ben, Peyton, Brady, Favre or even Mcnabb and Romo in him. We need that fire to put us over the hedge.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=prinzeofmoval;473155]Okay so we can't be mad for him getting jammed up look at [B]Brett, Tony and Tom last year[/B]. The had a miserable time and Jason is no where in their league. But he doesn't have the killer instinct that we need in a quarterback. I don't see [B]Ben, Peyton, Brady, Favre or even Mcnabb and Romo in him[/B]. We need that fire to put us over the hedge.[/quote]

All have better o-lines and WR's other than the Eagles then us there is not comparing them to Jason.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=Redskin Warrior;473163]All have better o-lines and WR's other than the Eagles then us there is not comparing them to Jason.[/quote]

How do you figure they have better recievers? Outside of Peyton who really does everybody has one good one with the rest being role players. O-Line you got me there.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=prinzeofmoval;473171]How do you figure they have better recievers? Outside of Peyton who really does everybody has one good one with the rest being role players. O-Line you got me there.[/quote]

JC often looks lethargic like Eli. You really can't tell what he's thinking and you certainly don't see him getting excited when he misses an open receiver. I don't know where this team will be in two weeks, but Jason has to get it right in 10 days.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

Wait til weeks 5-7 til we truly evaluate how JC is doing. If JC doesn't experience any significant improvement maybe we do have a QB problem, but til then all we can say is that he had a crappy opening game.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

[quote=jgalecpa;473106]Anybody have good information on what JC's Wunderlich test score was?

J-Dawg[/quote]

Dawg, I don't think the problem is JC's intellect but from what I remember his score wasn't too great.

Re: JC is not what I thought.
 

JC did look rough at times: he held onto the ball too long, he wasn't very mobile in the pocket, he stared down his primary receiver, and he threw under the chains too much. But he didn't have a whole lot of help. Poor pass protection threw off the timing on some routes like the deep ball to Santana that could've been a TD. Even when he made good throws, there were drops. Moss started running for some YAC without bringing it in, and Thrash had a beautiful deep ball bounce off his hands and shoulder pads. Penalties deflated drives. All those mistakes and the Giants D kept the offense from getting into a rhythm. Hopefully, New Orleans' D is still just as porous as it was last year, and the O can get it going next week.