Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=tryfuhl;602334]and we're criticizing sanchez heh[/quote]

Yeah because some people think he is solely responsible for when the Jets are winning. But when he its is his sole responsibility in leading his team to win like today. He loses. Great D and running game helps him to look good. Today you saw what happened. Will be a good QB but people on here hype him too much.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602496]No, two bad halves and one throw to Moss after he beat his man on a double move. He was not seeing the field at all. I have no idea what was happening downfield without the All-22, but it is obvious that the guy is not making quick decisions, has no timing to his game, and is unable to get a clear picture of the defenses he is seeing. That Tampa team was the worst pass defense in the NFL coming into this game. It is also a complete fallacy to think that this was the first poor game that Campbell has had this year. He has had these problems seeing the field all year, it just showed up more blatantly in the stat line today.[/quote]

Do you think Todd Collins is the answer?

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Ruhskins;602498]So you're completely disregarding the 10 play drive ending with the Cooley TD, right?[/quote]

Might as well give up Ruhskins. Misery loves company!! So this guy is saying Campbell had only one good pass? Not saying he played great today. But some people want something to complain about but rarely give any credit when credit is due. Just bitch bitch bitch. But some are correct in saying that this is what a forum board is for and it would be boring without the whining. But you have to at least point out the good things when they happen. We know JC threw 3 ints. But Portis played better and the Defense played better and we scored 2 TD's (not in garbage time -- because those dont count by some peoples standards). Oh and guess what...


WE WON :D

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Ruhskins;602498]So you're completely disregarding the 10 play drive ending with the Cooley TD, right?[/quote]

You mean this drive?

1-10-WAS 31 (8:56) 26-C.Portis left end pushed ob at WAS 39 for 8 yards (51-B.Ruud).

2-2-WAS 39 (8:32) 17-J.Campbell pass short right to 47-C.Cooley to TB 44 for 17 yards (54-G.Hayes). [B]Tight end screen. Hmm, wonder if Campbell's struggles led the team to change the playcalling to protect their QB. No need to read the defense, pass is preset.[/B]

1-10-TB 44 (7:54) 26-C.Portis up the middle to TB 42 for 2 yards (90-G.Adams).

2-8-TB 42 (7:20) 26-C.Portis up the middle to TB 40 for 2 yards (96-T.Crowder).

3-6-TB 40 (6:37) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell pass short right to 46-L.Betts to TB 36 for 4 yards (97-J.Wilkerson, 51-B.Ruud). [B]Check down to Ladell Betts. Picked up the first down here, but you still are not convincing me that he is a great quarterback. He flushed himself here too if I remember, so again no timing or rhythm. [/B]

Timeout #1 by WAS at 06:10.

4-2-TB 36 (6:10) 17-J.Campbell pass short middle to 47-C.Cooley to TB 24 for 12 yards (25-A.Talib). [B]Nice play to get open by Cooley. Again Campbell had to float right, but it did give Cooley a chance to slide to the open space. [/B]

1-10-TB 24 (5:32) 17-J.Campbell pass incomplete deep left to 47-C.Cooley (20-R.Barber).

2-10-TB 24 (5:27) 17-J.Campbell pass short right to 86-F.Davis to TB 25 for -1 yards (58-Q.Black). [B]Another tight end screen. I have trouble believing the play calling was not trying to compensate for Campbell's issues processing information. And I am sick of Zorn too, so it is not like I am trying to defend that guy either.[/B]

3-11-TB 25 (4:47) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell scrambles right end to TB 12 for 13 yards (58-Q.Black). [B]QB's that don't get a clear picture often scramble. Case in point.[/B]

1-10-TB 12 (4:02) PENALTY on WAS-89-S.Moss, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at TB 12 - No Play.

1-15-TB 17 (3:38) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell pass deep middle to 47-C.Cooley for 17 yards, TOUCHDOWN. [B]I can't remember precisely how this play developed, but I am fairly sure that it was not a play that Campbell made on rhythm. I think he flushed left before he made the throw. Again, he has trouble diagnosing defenses and anticipating routes. Here again, I am willing to bet that when I watch again he was able to throw to an open receiver, but unable to anticipate that player coming open.[/B]

Did you see him make any quick decisions and process information quickly all day? I haven't rewatched yet, but I don't remember seeing it. You're clearly content to go down with the HMS Campbell, nothing that happens will change your opinion, but I've seen enough.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602519]You mean this drive?

1-10-WAS 31 (8:56) 26-C.Portis left end pushed ob at WAS 39 for 8 yards (51-B.Ruud).

2-2-WAS 39 (8:32) 17-J.Campbell pass short right to 47-C.Cooley to TB 44 for 17 yards (54-G.Hayes). [B]Tight end screen. Hmm, wonder if Campbell's struggles led the team to change the playcalling to protect their QB. No need to read the defense, pass is preset.[/B]

1-10-TB 44 (7:54) 26-C.Portis up the middle to TB 42 for 2 yards (90-G.Adams).

2-8-TB 42 (7:20) 26-C.Portis up the middle to TB 40 for 2 yards (96-T.Crowder).

3-6-TB 40 (6:37) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell pass short right to 46-L.Betts to TB 36 for 4 yards (97-J.Wilkerson, 51-B.Ruud). [B]Check down to Ladell Betts. Picked up the first down here, but you still are not convincing me that he is a great quarterback. He flushed himself here too if I remember, so again no timing or rhythm. [/B]

Timeout #1 by WAS at 06:10.

4-2-TB 36 (6:10) 17-J.Campbell pass short middle to 47-C.Cooley to TB 24 for 12 yards (25-A.Talib). [B]Nice play to get open by Cooley. Again Campbell had to float right, but it did give Cooley a chance to slide to the open space. [/B]

1-10-TB 24 (5:32) 17-J.Campbell pass incomplete deep left to 47-C.Cooley (20-R.Barber).

2-10-TB 24 (5:27) 17-J.Campbell pass short right to 86-F.Davis to TB 25 for -1 yards (58-Q.Black). [B]Another tight end screen. I have trouble believing the play calling was not trying to compensate for Campbell's issues processing information. And I am sick of Zorn too, so it is not like I am trying to defend that guy either.[/B]

3-11-TB 25 (4:47) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell scrambles right end to TB 12 for 13 yards (58-Q.Black). [B]QB's that don't get a clear picture often scramble. Case in point.[/B]

1-10-TB 12 (4:02) PENALTY on WAS-89-S.Moss, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at TB 12 - No Play.

1-15-TB 17 (3:38) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell pass deep middle to 47-C.Cooley for 17 yards, TOUCHDOWN. [B]I can't remember precisely how this play developed, but I am fairly sure that it was not a play that Campbell made on rhythm. I think he flushed left before he made the throw. Again, he has trouble diagnosing defenses and anticipating routes. Here again, I am willing to bet that when I watch again he was able to throw to an open receiver, but unable to anticipate that player coming open.[/B]

Did you see him make any quick decisions and process information quickly all day? I haven't rewatched yet, but I don't remember seeing it. You're clearly content to go down with the HMS Campbell, nothing that happens will change your opinion, but I've seen enough.[/quote]

Is this guy seriously using a successful drive to point out how unsuccessful we were on this drive..:rofl:

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602519] [SIZE="5"] (3:38) (Shotgun) 17-J.Campbell pass deep middle to 47-C.Cooley for 17 yards, TOUCHDOWN.[/SIZE][B][/quote]


This is what f'ing matters and what you are disregarding.


[quote=SC Skins Fan;602519]I[B] can't remember precisely how this play developed, but I am fairly sure that it was not a play that Campbell made on rhythm. [/B] I think he flushed left before he made the throw. Again, he has trouble diagnosing defenses and anticipating routes. Here again, I am willing to bet that when I watch again he was able to throw to an open receiver, but unable to anticipate that player coming open.[/quote]

Great analysis there...you can't remember and you think. Good job.

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602519]You're clearly content to go down with the HMS Campbell, nothing that happens will change your opinion, but I've seen enough.[/quote]

If Campbell had not recovered, he would have been benched and I would be right here with you hating on him. To me, he came back, threw for two TDs and won the game.

I'm sure the Cowpukes wished Tony Homo could have done this today.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;602524]Is this guy seriously using a successful drive to point out how unsuccessful we were on this drive..:rofl:[/quote]

Gotta love those haters, I'm serious if someone hates a player, who obviously not going away any time, just stop watching. Give up, and wait until the offseason.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;602524]Is this guy seriously using a successful drive to point out how unsuccessful we were on a this drive..lol[/quote]
It's a little ridiculous, Campbell made plays with his feet, took what the defense was giving (listen to the commentators and their comments about the way the Tampa D was playing) and threw a strike to Cooley for a TD, and Campbell still gets hammered. Really ridiculous.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602519]You mean this drive?
1-10-TB 24 (5:32) 17-J.Campbell pass incomplete deep left to 47-C.Cooley (20-R.Barber).
[/quote]

Wait, what the hell is this? This must be a typo. A pass on 1st down? Sorry I'm not buying that.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602519]

Did you see him make any quick decisions and process information quickly all day? I haven't rewatched yet, but I don't remember seeing it. You're clearly content to go down with the HMS Campbell, nothing that happens will change your opinion, but I've seen enough.[/quote]

You've seen enough? And who do you propose we start in his place??

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

he still sucks, and we could/should have lost this game...he was picked off by the same corner covering moss the whole game, 3 times! I thought campbell was a smart decision maker according to his supporters here on the net

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=GMScud;602532]You've seen enough? And who do you propose we start in his place??[/quote]

Maybe he can close his eyes when the offense is on the field.

And how dare Campbell throw for two TDs! He should have folded and lost the game!

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602535]he still sucks, and we could/[B]should have lost [/B]this game...he was picked off by the same corner covering moss the whole game, 3 times! I thought campbell was a smart decision maker according to his supporters here on the net[/quote]

So you wanted him to lose. Great, just great.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=dmvskinsfan08]
[I]If we start winning I wonder what people will say then.[/I]
[/quote]

[quote=dgack;600877]* "Sure, but [opponent] sucks!"
* It's better playcalling, Campbell didn't do anything special
* It's the defense
* Portis found his step again
* The receivers are bailing out Campbell
* Luck
* He's still not a leader (whatever that means)
* etc[/quote]

In other news, teh intarwebs proved that Redskins fans are 100% predictable. Shocking.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602535]he still sucks, and we could/should have lost this game...he was picked off by the same corner covering moss the whole game, 3 times! I thought campbell was a smart decision maker according to his supporters here on the net[/quote]

True he was forcing it to moss on those plays. Trying to make something happen instead of dink and dunk. He also hit for a big 50+ yard TD also.

I would take you a lot more seriously if you weren't a lover of a player who hasn't played a game and is on IR for the year. Oops.

Oh and I almost fogot ...WE WON. So his mistakes didn't matter at the end of the game besides for those who want to hate. Some people will not like Campbell no matter what. I wonder why?

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=dgack;602538]In other news, teh intarwebs proved that Redskins fans are 100% predictable. Shocking.[/quote]

You called it on that one.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

Campbell haters will love it if he....

plays bad and loses it a game on his own (see Jake Delhomme) or

Campbell goes down for the season.

May neither of these things happen to him.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=GMScud;602532]You've seen enough? And who do you propose we start in his place??[/quote]

Obviously the team will keep rolling with Campbell. That is fine. My point is that I've seen enough that I do not expect anything to change. I've also seen enough that I am going to stop knocking my head against a wall in these threads.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602547]Obviously the team will keep rolling with Campbell. That is fine. My point is that I've seen enough that I do not expect anything to change. [B]I've also seen enough that I am going to stop knocking my head against a wall in these threads.[/B][/quote]

I highly doubt this. Maybe you'll get lucky and he'll actually lose a game this season (I think he did last year though).

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602547]Obviously the team will keep rolling with Campbell. That is fine. My point is that I've seen enough that I do not expect anything to change. I've also seen enough that I am going to stop knocking my head against a wall in these threads.[/quote]

Well, your line above your avatar says Todd Collins. Why is that? You really think with the way our O-line leaks that Collins would last even one game? Campbell's legs are keeping him out of the hospital right now. Collins would be dead meat. My grandmother can outrun that dude. But you are obviously advocating him as the starter. Bad choice.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

I just want us to do either really good or really bad cause I want us to either make the playoffs or get sam bradford. That way you all can see what a good NFL QB looks like. Campbell is NOT THE ANSWER. NOR IS ZORN. You know campbell sucks when the Broncos take Kyle Orton over him.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=GMScud;602551]Well, your line above your avatar says Todd Collins. Why is that? You really think with the way our O-line leaks that Collins would last even one game? Campbell's legs are keeping him out of the hospital right now. Collins would be dead meat. [B]My grandmother can outrun that dude.[/B] But you are obviously advocating him as the starter. Bad choice.[/quote]

Too funny. I think she can probably outrun Phillip Rivers, I just saw him scramble at the speed of a turtle.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602552]I just want us to do either really good or[B] really bad[/B] cause I want us to either make the playoffs or get sam bradford. That way you all can see what a good NFL QB looks like. Campbell is NOT THE ANSWER. NOR IS ZORN. You know campbell sucks when the Broncos take Kyle Orton over him.[/quote]

So you still want us to do bad. Great fan you are.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602552]I just want us to do either really good or really bad cause I want us to either make the playoffs or get sam bradford. That way you all can see what a good NFL QB looks like. Campbell is NOT THE ANSWER. NOR IS ZORN. You know campbell sucks when the Broncos take Kyle Orton over him.[/quote]

Yeah, because Kyle Orton has looked awesome thus far. His only play worth a shit today was on a phenomenal RAC by Brandon Marshall.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602547]Obviously the team will keep rolling with Campbell. That is fine. My point is that I've seen enough that I do not expect anything to change. I've also seen enough that I am going to stop knocking my head against a wall in these threads.[/quote]

Then stop watching. See, problem solved. Now we both can stop being annoyed.:oink:

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=GMScud;602556]Yeah, because Kyle Orton has looked awesome thus far. His only play worth a shit today was on a phenomenal RAC by Brandon Marshall.[/quote]

I think his point was that Orton sucks and the Broncos still chose him over Campbell. But let's be honest, some guys are not a good fit for certain systems, and Denver wants a guy who just doesn't lose the game for them (which probably says more about Cutler than it does Orton or Campbell).

Orton is 9th in the league in passer rating right now. Yet his attempts per game is 25th. /shrug

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602552]I just want us to do either really good or really bad cause I want us to either make the playoffs or get sam bradford. That way you all can see what a good NFL QB looks like. Campbell is NOT THE ANSWER. NOR IS ZORN. [B]You know campbell sucks when the Broncos take Kyle Orton over him.[/B][/quote]
Seems like Orton is making a name for himself right now, 15-7 as a starter I believe. That's really a tired argument though, and I wish campbell haters would stop using behind the scene trade rumors as somehow damning evidence of Campbell. It's kinda old.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

Let Campbell play! Let him show what he can do! Zorn needs to cut him loose a little bit. Aside from the NY game he has played well IMHO.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=GMScud;602556]Yeah, because Kyle Orton has looked awesome thus far. His only play worth a shit today was on a phenomenal RAC by Brandon Marshall.[/quote]

Right so I'm saying that he isn't good. Look, if snyderatto wanted to get cutler (better than campbell, thus far) and Sanchez (rookie with worse receivers than campbell, and better record than campbell) and Denver didn't want Campbell, theres obviously something that the NFL see's in Campbell that all you campbell supporters don't. After watching the first 4 games I can say I've seen enough of Campbell to say that he doesn't fit this offense/ isnt as far ahead as we thought he'd be considering this is the first time he's played in the same offense for more than one year since highschool

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602569]Right so I'm saying that he isn't good. Look, if snyderatto wanted to get cutler (better than campbell, thus far) and Sanchez (rookie with worse receivers than campbell, and better record than campbell) and Denver didn't want Campbell, theres obviously something that the NFL see's in Campbell that all you campbell supporters don't. [B]After watching the first 4 games I can say I've seen enough of Campbell to say that he doesn't fit this offense/ isnt as far ahead as we thought he'd be considering this is the first time he's played in the same offense for more than one year since highschool[/B][/quote]

Great, will this mean you'll stop following the Skins and wishing them to do bad?

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602569]Right so I'm saying that he isn't good. Look, if snyderatto wanted to get cutler (better than campbell, thus far) and Sanchez (rookie with worse receivers than campbell, and better record than campbell) and Denver didn't want Campbell, theres obviously something that the NFL see's in Campbell that all you campbell supporters don't. After watching the first 4 games I can say I've seen enough of Campbell to say that he doesn't fit this offense/ isnt as far ahead as we thought he'd be considering this is the first time he's played in the same offense for more than one year since highschool[/quote]

Again, there's a simple answer. Don't watch again until next season, maybe we'll have another QB then. Until that point, Campbell is our QB so either learn to deal with it or don't but please spare us your 5 cent analysis after every game.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;600780]I'll take a recent elite defensive player with a superbowl rings opinion over most others any day of the week.

I don't see how you can actually watch Cutler and Campbell play and think theyre equal. Theyre most certainly not. And Josh McDaniels, a guy who coached the best QB in the league, a guy who knows more about QBs than anyone here wanted Kyle Orton over Jason Campbell. If that's not damning for Campbell, then I dont know what is.

As to Sanchez, the Jets have far less talent on Offense than we do. That, combined with the fact that he's a rookie, makes his performance that more impressive. I'm impressed when i watch him and I respect Trent Diflers opinion on QBs and he's very high on Sanchez. In 5 years, or whenever Manning and Brady retire, Sanchez will be one of the top 3 QBs in the league. No, we were not in a position to draft him, but we should have tried harder to put ourselves in a position to be. Now we're gonna be stuck drafting one of the overrated QBs in the 2010 draft. On the bright side, atleast whoever we hire to replace Zorn will get to pick his own QB.[/quote]

I don't get your fascination with Rodney Harrison. The guy has been an NFL analyst all of four weeks and now he's suddenley the Jason Campbell expert? If Super Bowl rings are the new standard for valuing one's opinion, then I'm sure there are a few people out there with Super Bowl rings that think very highly of Jason Campbell. In fact, a guy name Joe Gibbs who has three of them comes to mind. But I digress.

You're entitled to your critique of Jason Campbell. Is he one of the top tier QBs in the league right now, probably not. But the quarterbacks that are have a strong supporting cast from top to bottom, my friend. I submit that Jason Campbell is doing much more with less.

And for all the Campbell haters calling for Todd Collins to come in, you need your head checked if you don't think Collins gets sacked at least four or five times today.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=12thMan;602575]I don't get your fascination with Rodney Harrison. The guy has been an NFL analyst all of four weeks and now he's suddenley the Jason Campbell expert? If Super Bowl rings are the new standard for valuing one's opinion, then I'm sure there are a few people out there with Super Bowl rings that think very highly of Jason Campbell. In fact, a guy name Joe Gibbs who has three of them comes to mind. But I digress.

You're entitled to your critique of Jason ampbell. Is he one of the top tier QBs in the league right now, probably not. But the quarterbacks that are have a strong supporting cast from top to bottom, my friend. I submit that Jason Campbell is doing much more with less.

And for all the Campbell haters calling for Todd Collins to come in, you need your head checked if you don't think Collins gets sacked at least four or five times today.[/quote]

It's funny how people say "well Denver didn't want Campbell and took Orton"...well newsflash, they didn't want Cutler either. It's obvious that Darth Hoody Jr. wanted his own QB, and talent hasn't much to do with it, otherwise he would have kept Cutler.

I don't know why these JC haters think some of us are arguing that Campbell is an elite QB. My beef with these haters is that...

- They think Campbell is the only problem in this team
- Want to blame him for losing a game (which he hasn't)
- Attack him when he does well
- And think everything he does well is luck.

I want for Campbell to be a game manager QB. Our team is supposed to have a good running game and defense that just needs an average QB to win. In the past couple of games, Campbell has been a bit above average, but our "strengths" haven't been there, hence the two losses.

In this game, our running game was there in the second half and our defense stepped things up. Campbell almost lost this game by having those turnovers, but he threw two TDs. If he doesn't throw those two TDs, he loses the game for us and the haters get their argument win. He didn't lose the game, so the haters get a disappointment and now must wait another week until their dream of the Jason Campbell breakdown becomes a reality.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

No, I'm still gonna watch us lose, just so I can go on these threads and hear all this campbell supporters above my post not say anything on sundays when we're sucking against whatever bad team we're playing, throwing picks or staying on one receiver the whole time, or always finishing one yard shy of the first or missing open receivers. Plus I want us to get a good QB next year in the draft, simply because I can tell you all with confidence that JC won't be here next year nor will Zorn. Shannahan will draft Sam Bradford, Jevan snead, or tim tebow.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SC Skins Fan;602547]Obviously the team will keep rolling with Campbell. That is fine. My point is that I've seen enough that I do not expect anything to change. I've also seen enough that I am going to stop knocking my head against a wall in these threads.[/quote]

:frusty:

lol

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;602582]No, I'm still gonna watch us lose, just so I can go on these threads and hear all this campbell supporters above my post not say anything on sundays when we're sucking against whatever bad team we're playing, throwing picks or staying on one receiver the whole time, or always finishing one yard shy of the first or missing open receivers. Plus I want us to get a good QB next year in the draft, simply because I can tell you all with confidence that JC won't be here next year nor will Zorn. Shannahan will draft Sam Bradford, Jevan snead, or tim tebow.[/quote]

and root for the Cowboys....I mean might as well.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Ruhskins;602579]It's funny how people say "well Denver didn't want Campbell and took Orton"...well newsflash, they didn't want Cutler either. It's obvious that Darth Hoody Jr. wanted his own QB, and talent hasn't much to do with it, otherwise he would have kept Cutler.

I don't know why these JC haters think some of us are arguing that Campbell is an elite QB. My beef with these haters is that...

- They think Campbell is the only problem in this team
- Want to blame him for losing a game (which he hasn't)
- Attack him when he does well
- And think everything he does well is luck.

I want for Campbell to be just an average or above average QB. Our team is supposed to have a good running game and defense that just needs an average QB to win. In the past couple of games, Campbell has been a bit above average, but our "strengths" haven't been there, hence the two losses.

In this game, our running game was there in the second half and our defense stepped things up. Campbell almost lost this game by having those turnovers, but he threw two TDs. If he doesn't throw those two TDs, he loses the game for us and the haters get their argument win. He didn't lose the game, so the haters get a disappointment and now must wait another week until their dream of the Jason Campbell breakdown becomes a reality.[/quote]

It's call nitpicking, but don't tell Rodney Harrison that:)

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Ruhskins;602579]
In this game, our running game was there in the second half and our defense stepped things up. Campbell almost lost this game by having those turnovers, but he threw two TDs. [/quote]

Yeah, dude came back and overcame a bad half which is a lot easier said than done.

His QB rating in the 3rd quarter was 157.2 (which is almost perfect). That's a good sign after a half of play where his rating was an unbelievably bad 13.8.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

Ladies and Gentlemen, your fan of the year...

[quote=CultBrennan59;602582][B][SIZE="4"]No, I'm still gonna watch us lose[/SIZE][/B][/quote]

[quote=CultBrennan59;602552][B]I just want us to do[/B] either really good or [B]really bad[/B][/quote]

[quote=CultBrennan59;602535]he still sucks, [B]and we could/should have lost this game[/B][/quote]

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Ruhskins;602596]Ladies and Gentlemen, your fan of the year...[/quote]

hahahaha...let's remember you saying this at the bye week, and we'll see how great our QB is and how our coach is doing, OK?