So much for serious!

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Spine buster, followed by the people's elbow.

You'll all be crouching in a puddle of your own urine.

<pout>

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1065217]

I can't decide if you are dense or willfully ignorant when you try to justify your aim with skewed statistical methods.[/quote]


I have that thought all the time about you and your buddies .So how many children died in Newtown Conn on that day by car ?It is the ignorance of the pro gun group that make discussions impossible .

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Nobody got killed in my building today. I know of at least 30 other handgun owners that live here, therefore there's NEVER been ANY gun violence in this building EVER. Nor will there ever be.

Using your logic to favor my idea.:doh:

I understand that the facts don't support your position, but try, just for once, to look at it honestly.

Now, see if you can honestly answer my question.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

My kind of gun drill:

[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI01qKAqYts"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI01qKAqYts[/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

GiantOne's People:

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/1511918_610048625730451_1446523986_n.jpg[/IMG]


[COLOR=White]If you need to ask "Which person?" you're as stupid as GiantOne.[/COLOR]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-state-senator-leland-yee-arrested-in-federal-raid/"]California state Sen. Leland Yee arrested on bribery, arms dealing charges[/URL]

[I]Yee discussed helping the agent get weapons worth $500,000 to $2.5 million, including shoulder-fired automatic weapons and missiles, and took him through the entire process of acquiring them from a Muslim separatist group in the Philippines to bringing them to the United States, according to the affidavit by FBI Special Agent Emmanuel V. Pascua.[/I]

Yee was also earlier quote as saying-"[I]It is extremely important that individuals in the state of California do not own assault weapons. I mean that is just so crystal clear, there is no debate, no discussion.[/I]"

Anti-gun hypocrites, you have to love them. They're adorable!

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065493]GiantOne's People:

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/1511918_610048625730451_1446523986_n.jpg[/IMG]


[COLOR=White]If you need to ask "Which person?" you're as stupid as GiantOne.[/COLOR][/quote]


Dumb bitches. Just as bad as the religious fundies.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065493][COLOR=white].[/COLOR][/quote]

and RedskinRats type of people ....
[URL="http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/"]25 Deadliest Mass Shootings in U.S. History Fast Facts - CNN.com[/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/26/leland-yee-gun-traffickin_n_5038152.html]California Senate's Top Gun Control Advocate Arrested In Firearms Trafficking Plot[/url]


Oooo...the irony. One of the Congress biggest anti-gun supporters is caught......running guns.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1065506]and RedskinRats type of people ....
[URL="http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/"]25 Deadliest Mass Shootings in U.S. History Fast Facts - CNN.com[/URL][/quote]

Not sure what the purpose of this post is? Are you saying I'm a mass murderer? I'm not

Are you suggesting I support mass murder? I don't

I've also never been murdered with a handgun or committed suicide with one.

What's your point?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065749]Not sure what the purpose of this post is?









What's your point?[/quote]
post 527 , what was yours >?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1065757]post 527 , what was yours >?[/quote]

So me accusing you of not wanting a debate is the same as you accusing me of being a mass murderer?

Otay.......

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065759]So me accusing you of not wanting a debate is the same as you accusing me of being a mass murderer?

Otay.......[/quote]


LOL, yeah so where did I say that ?The earthquake must have made you dizzy .I said they were your people as you said the anti gun people were mine .

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065759]So me accusing you of not wanting a debate is the same as you accusing me of being a mass murderer?

Otay.......[/quote]Gotta laugh when he misinterprets his own posts. I'm still SMH at his implication that the "pro-gun" crowd is responsible for mass murderers. Guess in G1-land, car clubs and auto manufacturers are responsible for drunk driving.....

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[QUOTE=HailGreen28;1065889]Gotta laugh when he misinterprets his own posts. QUOTE]


lol....and the lies just keep on coming .

From you, GiantOne, yes. They do.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1065959]From you, GiantOne, yes. They do.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk[/quote]


lol,



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfLArp6fJ0E]Tommy Roe - Dizzy (stereo) - YouTube[/ame]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Would you people please stop feeding the troll. If you don't feed it, it will die. Pretend it is not there.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Buffalo Bob;1066003]Would you people please stop feeding the troll. If you don't feed it, it will die. Pretend it is not there.[/quote]He's a great bad example. Love him supporting the Giants and gun-grabbing. (Christianity and cops not so much) I like G1 being on this board. And diversity of opinion is good. Please note I'm not responding to his last response to me.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

I agree, HG28.

[IMG]http://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/10155379_760624690638928_1172938057_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=vW98hyeh8hgVUM&tbnid=DxLYyduoU31eDM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fblogs%2Fxx_factor%2F2013%2F04%2F09%2Fnra_recommends_arming_school_officials_why_guns_in_school_are_a_bad_idea.html&ei=5mY4U5LRGYrQsQTnhoFQ&psig=AFQjCNGT7UpkDsw3K7fZoZvgdNwVu4sZIQ&ust=1396291684244378"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS-hLPy7itYplXC2cwEA_fEVz9w5l94wC2FYzOk7db-pCu0tGcwsw[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/liveblog/wp/2012/12/14/newtown-school-shooting-sandy-hook-elementary/]Newtown school shooting: Sandy Hook Elementary[/url]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1066098][URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=vW98hyeh8hgVUM&tbnid=DxLYyduoU31eDM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fblogs%2Fxx_factor%2F2013%2F04%2F09%2Fnra_recommends_arming_school_officials_why_guns_in_school_are_a_bad_idea.html&ei=5mY4U5LRGYrQsQTnhoFQ&psig=AFQjCNGT7UpkDsw3K7fZoZvgdNwVu4sZIQ&ust=1396291684244378"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS-hLPy7itYplXC2cwEA_fEVz9w5l94wC2FYzOk7db-pCu0tGcwsw[/IMG][/URL][/quote][IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-OPBtJ09NAZU/UdW9RKoFLyI/AAAAAAACY20/Y62KYP0G5HI/s552/defend_everything_with_guns.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.iowagop.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2Acartoon_thumb.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/931440_556451674398522_1912497453_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Tell me again how more gun safety won't save lives and how more gun safety takes away from the 2nd amendment ?



[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=SS43sKCKi0tUXM&tbnid=R6F7ITL-L2IgHM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbeforeitsnews.com%2Falternative%2F2014%2F02%2Fman-demonstrates-gun-safety-by-shooting-himself-in-the-head-2907914.html&ei=AEw5U9n2NszIsAT90oJI&psig=AFQjCNFobOtCQmo2QWr77LQwisrjfuPBCg&ust=1396350324371285"][/URL]




[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=SS43sKCKi0tUXM&tbnid=R6F7ITL-L2IgHM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.coloribus.com%2Fadsarchive%2Fprints%2Fgun-safety-founding-fathers-2308405%2F&ei=Jks5U86bJamtsQT42oCoDQ&bvm=bv.63808443,d.aWM&psig=AFQjCNGFe5VvR3uM_i5df2QrUC9SGDRY3A&ust=1396350101068920"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT3_OTnTEwCavSEagL_ha8_WCmK-E7j6zxzQhNO62nGTnn4PjoB[/IMG][/URL]


[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=EANa4vaIViPrSM&tbnid=jjq3ZfLMHxLVgM:&ved=0CAgQjRw4LA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsightingsat60.blogspot.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fgun-safety-not-gun-control.html&ei=nEs5U7OdL9GoqwH2-YD4CQ&psig=AFQjCNFumlZFAEtnWYHs1fsSQv-oXa_RnQ&ust=1396350236831819"][IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xC7qZBzwGAk/UM-A_og0H-I/AAAAAAAACFI/KabPH-Yiazg/s1600/handguns4.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=2EsqGfhAj_aE5M&tbnid=GOSwd3XcCcnVhM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Flatino.foxnews.com%2Flatino%2Fnews%2F2012%2F12%2F17%2Fconnecticut-school-shooting-victims-laid-to-rest-newtown-mourns%2F&ei=Yk05U6i0DqausASyi4CIDw&psig=AFQjCNHZP5fnKEl77hzOfJf7ousqPD6tRw&ust=1396350688287668"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRfTQoFsZ9VHZIk5KT8eygeIBLVkY8Rv11_Go4Brgfxduxz9IKk[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Pretty sure this is not what the founding fathers of American were thinking when they wrote the 2nd amendment .

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=slwDzHoFQbWLIM&tbnid=5lgMqqnsVCUWOM:&ved=0CAgQjRw4mAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FColumbine_High_School_massacre&ei=BE45U5mNB4q5qAGDjYCICg&psig=AFQjCNEvAs3KiP_HzZ7iiDCCfBVodBJocQ&ust=1396350852209936"][IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Columbine_Shooting_Security_Camera.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=b2WywtPJwAfPaM&tbnid=2YYW7OsYM1IWIM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartgunlaws.org%2F2013-state-scorecard-why-gun-laws-matter%2F&ei=eVc5U5H1MM2msASZsoCoDw&psig=AFQjCNGtUhc2VEnzen3mUCUGiCCra8tRnw&ust=1396353219282389"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSY9ZP-Tx9ioJCvtkWwa9ur6BGTB6QCqZHJ2Cps63lLEUfLPLJz[/IMG][/URL]

[QUOTE=Giantone;1066165][URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=b2WywtPJwAfPaM&tbnid=2YYW7OsYM1IWIM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartgunlaws.org%2F2013-state-scorecard-why-gun-laws-matter%2F&ei=eVc5U5H1MM2msASZsoCoDw&psig=AFQjCNGtUhc2VEnzen3mUCUGiCCra8tRnw&ust=1396353219282389"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSY9ZP-Tx9ioJCvtkWwa9ur6BGTB6QCqZHJ2Cps63lLEUfLPLJz[/IMG][/URL][/QUOTE]
You keep pointing to the Newtown shooting as evidence of the need for more laws, then you post this that showing Conn. is in the top 5 for strictest laws and you don't see the flaw in your thinking?

That's the funniest/most frustrating part. He really doesn't, AND he gets to vote. We, as a nation, are truly screwed

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1066173]You keep pointing to the Newtown shooting as evidence of the need for more laws, then you post this that showing Conn. is in the top 5 for strictest laws and you don't see the flaw in your thinking?[/quote]


Only some one who lacks understanding would think there is a flaw in pointing out Newtown as a reason for more gun safety.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=2A8_o8gb8kHc9M&tbnid=RNydFzuLvjpdeM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjobsanger.blogspot.com%2F2013%2F08%2Fmassive-gun-owner-database.html&ei=cXw5U7rOKq7nsATk3ICgAg&psig=AFQjCNHMm2hWzpZY2qu3p-DrH71aISwHDA&ust=1396362736514783"][IMG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RbVEg8VLnjk/UhZ08EClNII/AAAAAAAA4BQ/fHeajwFcv-8/s1600/gun+data+base.png[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=XRsBu8yI5vJ32M&tbnid=6xbMMYnQwzNsxM:&ved=0CAgQjRw4ygE&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheprogressivecynic.com%2F2013%2F01%2F19%2Frefuting-gun-enthusiasts-anti-gun-control-arguments-part-2%2F&ei=o305U__3LqrfsATb2oKoBw&psig=AFQjCNHNNNkxpKlA4HDM0IP__5aI0J4vKQ&ust=1396363043842402"][IMG]http://progressivecynic.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/g17.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1066187]That's the funniest/most frustrating part. He really doesn't, AND he gets to vote. We, as a nation, are truly screwed
[/quote]


This country truly lacks education and critical thinking.

[QUOTE=Giantone;1066203][URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=2A8_o8gb8kHc9M&tbnid=RNydFzuLvjpdeM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjobsanger.blogspot.com%2F2013%2F08%2Fmassive-gun-owner-database.html&ei=cXw5U7rOKq7nsATk3ICgAg&psig=AFQjCNHMm2hWzpZY2qu3p-DrH71aISwHDA&ust=1396362736514783"][IMG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RbVEg8VLnjk/UhZ08EClNII/AAAAAAAA4BQ/fHeajwFcv-8/s1600/gun+data+base.png[/IMG][/URL][/QUOTE]

And how will the NRA go about using that database to confiscate weapons?

Every company has a database they use for marketing. If you can't differentiate between what the State and Federal Government wants to do and what the NRA wants to do then that speaks volumes regarding your lack of understanding of the situation.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1066157]Tell me again how more gun safety won't save lives and how more gun safety takes away from the 2nd amendment[/quote]Thank you for coming to your senses and agreeing with people like the NRA.
[IMG]http://eddieeagle.nra.org/images/eddie/k8w6732.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://ironsightdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/NRA-Logo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://cmsimg.detnews.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=C3&Date=20120930&Category=METRO02&ArtNo=209300313&Ref=AR&MaxW=640&Border=0&NRA-role-training-gun-owners-under-scrutiny-Oakland-County[/IMG]

Instead of being one of those gun-grabbing nuts like this clown.
[IMG]http://media.salon.com/2012/12/large-580x342.png[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1066200]Only some one who lacks understanding would think there is a flaw in pointing out Newtown as a reason for more gun safety.[/quote]
ok. See if you can follow this, it will be difficult to get past your inate bias, but try:

Fact: Connecticut has the 2nd toughest gun laws. (source - your post)
Fact: Connecticut is 6th in lowest gun death rate. (source - your post)
Fact: Sandy Hook Elementary, is in Newtown, which is in Connecticut(World map)
Fact: The gun used was a registered and legally obtained and kept weapon(all substantiated reports)
FACT: THE MURDERER BROKE THE LAW TO OBTAIN THE GUN (and by extrapolation, would have broken any law written to obtain the gun)

some more interesting information:
here is a link to the [url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/]25 Deadliest Mass Shootings in U.S. History Fast Facts - CNN.com[/url].

and the top 5 toughest gun law states as rated by BradyCampaign.org with their number of shootings, and number of people killed in each:
California 3-8,13,21
Conn 2-27,8
NJ 0-0
Md 1-12
NY 1-13

and the bottom 5, or weakest gun law states as rated by BradyCampaign.org, again with number of shootings and number of people killed in each:
Utah 0-0
Arizona 0-0
Alaska 1-8
Okla 1-14
NDakota 0-0

Texas had 3(13,18,23) and ranked 39th.
Colorado and VA both had 2, ranked 15th, and 19th respectively.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=HailGreen28;1066236]Thank you for coming to your senses and agreeing with people like the NRA.
[/quote]


I see you can't answer the question .




[URL="https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=F_ElBHPOI3tjQM&tbnid=tgz8eytokMXw2M:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fguncontrolnowusa.wordpress.com%2Fpage%2F3%2F&ei=xKY5U6TkJ-qpsQTJvYHwDQ&bvm=bv.63808443,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFoh7h1BnKNu2jTMdiqoY66OT29CQ&ust=1396373371345252"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRmuOF_2CVZsjYRi8vWhr1iRxLh-FXeXJljcLd1NNW0e2FHpvlz[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1066242]ok. See if you can follow this, it will be difficult to get past your inate bias, .[/quote]



Did Conn pass the laws before or after Newtown ?

1) people can still buy guns in Conn
2) No one has had any guns confiscated
3)No ones second amendment rights were harmed

............see if your innate bias can comprehend that .