Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[quote=Hog1;270297]Help me clarify Rob,
are you the 100% pure person? or who is? metaphor?
In the next paragraph, who are you referring to? Who exploited people?
Just curious, thanx



How can a man 100% purely good in the heart, who doesn't believe in an entity known as "God", defy what a relegion speaks of.

I also found it entirely plausible for someone, throughout the corse of time, to have created a religion and exploited people. It just all seems very likely for that to have happened.[/quote]
Yeah, sorry... it was 4:00am when I wrote this...

I was referring to those kind of people that exploit people in general. They've always been here, and always will be here. So it's not hard to fathom that some random guy, or group of people, decided to make a religion and exploit a populations fear of death into some scam.

Secondly to clarify about a 100% pure person...I was speaking about the possibility that someone purely good can't go to heaven according to certain religions.

If Ghandi, for example, didn't believe in god and helped millions of people how could he not go to heaven? How could someone to fit every definition of what is a good person is in certain religions not reach the ultimate reward? Why is having faith so important?

In a world as confusing as this one is, it's hard to understand why faith is what gets you in. However, I do see faith as an important concept in general, but not necessarily in god par se.

In some ways, we all have to have "faith". If we were total skeptics about everything we would get nothing accomplished. We have to have faith that doing what's good is the right thing.

There really is no empirical evidence, aside from being raised a particular way or another, that doing "good" is right at all... so the concept of faith isn't totally unfamiliar.

See [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_of_faith]Leap of faith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] . My philosophy teacher in high school totally broke the whole class down for a month. Made us all total skeptics, and then in the end... presented the "leap of faith" above and it blew us all away. I thought it was pretty cool.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[QUOTE=Schneed10;270251]No, I'm recalling. You're not reading what I'm saying.

Sure you may have to start betting $5 at first. But if your system ALWAYS wins, as you stated and I quoted, then after a few days of betting $5 you can afford to start betting $10 at a time. Then after a few days winning at that level, double your bets to $20. And after a few days winning at that level, double your bets to $40, and so on. Keep doing that till you're at the high roller tables, betting the max they allow you in the entire casino. After a month of ramping up your bets, you'll be pulling in tens of thousands in profits each day. That is, if your system does indeed ALWAYS win. Which you stated. What is there to lose?

Haven't you ever thought of this? I mean you could be a multimillionaire with this system. Nothing would stop you. Can you answer me why you don't do it this way? Or are you just going to selectively skip over this post just like the last time I asked you this very same question in this very same thread?

If you can't answer it, it shows you're a fraud.[/QUOTE]

Funny you bring this up again. Cause you intentions are completely honorable right? So if you TRUELY beleive that my system CAN'T work, then why would you insist on someone taking their life savings and going to Vegas????????
Even though I shouldn't tell you, my wife and I have a plan on this next cruise that we are going to try. If it works, we might actually go down the road you speak of. Time will tell. It's hard to leave your comfort zone and your insurance.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[QUOTE=RobH4413;270416]Yeah, sorry... it was 4:00am when I wrote this...

I was referring to those kind of people that exploit people in general. They've always been here, and always will be here. So it's not hard to fathom that some random guy, or group of people, decided to make a religion and exploit a populations fear of death into some scam.

Secondly to clarify about a 100% pure person...I was speaking about the possibility that someone purely good can't go to heaven according to certain religions.

If Ghandi, for example, didn't believe in god and helped millions of people how could he not go to heaven? How could someone to fit every definition of what is a good person is in certain religions not reach the ultimate reward? Why is having faith so important?

In a world as confusing as this one is, it's hard to understand why faith is what gets you in. However, I do see faith as an important concept in general, but not necessarily in god par se.

In some ways, we all have to have "faith". If we were total skeptics about everything we would get nothing accomplished. We have to have faith that doing what's good is the right thing.

There really is no empirical evidence, aside from being raised a particular way or another, that doing "good" is right at all... so the concept of faith isn't totally unfamiliar.

See [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_of_faith]Leap of faith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] . My philosophy teacher in high school totally broke the whole class down for a month. Made us all total skeptics, and then in the end... presented the "leap of faith" above and it blew us all away. I thought it was pretty cool.[/QUOTE]

No person can be 100% pure. It's impossible. That aside, I actually understand exactly where you're coming from. That's why I said my comments about grace in a previous post, and comments about "why do all the religions have the same common demoninator in God with several different saviors?"
I also look at it like this, if God loves us unconditionally, then why would he set us up for certain doom. Maybe, just maybe, the bible is a way of scaring us straight. Kind of like when you parents said "you'll get hairy palms if you masterbate (or go blind)", or "if you take a hit of marijuana, you'll die". etc. Their intentions are honorable, but they are trying to scare you from doing something that could hurt you.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[quote=jsarno;270522][B]No person can be 100% pure[/B]. It's impossible. That aside, I actually understand exactly where you're coming from. That's why I said my comments about grace in a previous post, and comments about "why do all the religions have the same common demoninator in God with several different saviors?"
I also look at it like this, if God loves us unconditionally, then why would he set us up for certain doom. Maybe, just maybe, the bible is a way of scaring us straight. Kind of like when you parents said "you'll get hairy palms if you masterbate (or go blind)", or "if you take a hit of marijuana, you'll die". etc. Their intentions are honorable, but they are trying to scare you from doing something that could hurt you.[/quote]
It was an exaggeration to emphasize a point...


Organized religions are human institutions. Anything human is always very, very corrupt. You can look at governments to understand that. I'm not saying that they're totally evil things, but I think they do alot more harm then most people can come to terms with.

Your second point I tend to agree with. If you look at every religion, you'll find a similar path; be God like. This is taken both literally and metaphorically in some religions... where some believe that one will become god and lose their individuality, or that we are to look to a "God" as a guide to live by.

Christianity is living like Jesus, and Jesus is in-fact God.

I hate to bring the same quote from earlier in the thread, but..

[quote=311]In times of trouble
Everyone joins a team
No one waves a flag
For all human beings
No one's excited
Unless they are divided
Someone's going to have to give
It seems uncertain
I'd like to be
One of the faithful millions
But what I see
Is an excuse for the killing

Your denomination
Should be a private thing
How about a spirit
For all human beings
How could something well guided
Turn out to be divisive
Mostly wondering
It seems uncertain[/quote]

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[QUOTE=RobH4413;270525]It was an exaggeration to emphasize a point...


Organized religions are human institutions. Anything human is always very, very corrupt. You can look at governments to understand that. I'm not saying that they're totally evil things, but I think they do alot more harm then most people can come to terms with.

Your second point I tend to agree with. If you look at every religion, you'll find a similar path; be God like. This is taken both literally and metaphorically in some religions... where some believe that one will become god and lose their individuality, or that we are to look to a "God" as a guide to live by.

Christianity is living like Jesus, and Jesus is in-fact God.

I hate to bring the same quote from earlier in the thread, but..[/QUOTE]

#1- What the hell are you doing up so late / early?
#2- Quoting a racist group (311...ie: 3, 11 being the K in the alphabet as the 11th letter...3 K's...KKK.) is not a good thing.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[quote=jsarno;270527]#1- What the hell are you doing up so late / early?
#2- Quoting a racist group (311...ie: 3, 11 being the K in the alphabet as the 11th letter...3 K's...KKK.) is not a good thing.[/quote]

#1) I work at a bar/restaurant called "Hard Times Cafe"... I get out of there around 3:00/3:30 so Im usually up for a good hour after I get off. My schedule varies greatly, so some Im always on at awkward times.

#2) You just irked every 311 fan in the world on that one. I'll clear the air for ya:

[quote=http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/311_(band)] In [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/1997"][COLOR=#336600]1997[/COLOR][/URL] the band started to receive criticism due to perceived racism as "311" is used as a symbol, particularly in prison tattoos, for the [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan"][COLOR=#336600]Ku Klux Klan[/COLOR][/URL] because K is the 11th letter of the [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Alphabet"][COLOR=#336600]alphabet[/COLOR][/URL] (Three 11s = Three Ks = KKK) [URL="http://www.reference.com/go/http://www.adl.org/hate_symbols/numbers_311.asp"][IMG]http://cache.lexico.com/r/g/link-extern.gif[/IMG][/URL] It was also rumored that Nick Hexum was a member of [URL="http://www.reference.com/go/http://wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Front"][COLOR=#336600]The National Front[/COLOR][/URL], which is a [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/White_supremacy"][COLOR=#336600]white supremacy[/COLOR][/URL] group.

The name actually came from a [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Skinny_dipping"][COLOR=#336600]skinny dipping[/COLOR][/URL] incident when Jim Watson, the band's former guitarist, was charged with [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Indecent_exposure"][COLOR=#336600]indecent exposure[/COLOR][/URL] by the [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Omaha_Police_Department"][COLOR=#336600]Omaha Police Department[/COLOR][/URL] and was escorted home handcuffed and naked. The police code which appeared on the citation was "311". Nick Hexum has said: After the humor of the name wore off, we still kept it because we liked that it was just abstract and that it did not define us in any way. The name did not describe our sound or our politics, it just let the music speak for itself.
Released in 1994 on [I]Grassroots[/I], long before the KKK rumor surfaced, the song "Silver" provides some strong words about racism:
Of the racist institutions, simple minds belong;Not happy being human, no wish to get along.Little people need exclusions; sucker groups to throng.It makes them feel special; it makes them feel strong.Now I've got a clique but it's more like a family.Not an ethnic trip more like an ethic sea.I write the rhyme today, tell it to you later.Whether we're comin' in whack or what.It's a waste to be a hater.
In response to the rumors, Nick Hexum began to write a song for the 1997 release [I]Transistor[/I] titled "**** The KKK". After thinking about the title and how it wasn't true to the positive nature of 311, he revised it and ended up with "Electricity", the sixth track on the album.
First two lines from "Electricity":
This song started as a rant against hatersBut that'd be giving in to the instigators
Last verse:
A call out for unityIn every province and city.What do you think we've been saying''Since we first started playing?
(These last lines can be seen as a reference to the early 311 song "Unity".) It should also be noted that singer Doug "SA" Martinez is of [URL="http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Latino"][COLOR=#336600]Latino[/COLOR][/URL] descent. [/quote]

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

LOL I love the fact that stupid 311 rumor is still alive and kicking 10 years later.

If you know anything about 311, their music, and their message, you would understand just how stupid that tie in to the KKK really is. Nothing could be further from reality.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[QUOTE=jsarno;270522]I also look at it like this, if God loves us unconditionally, then why would he set us up for certain doom. Maybe, just maybe, the bible is a way of scaring us straight. Kind of like when you parents said "you'll get hairy palms if you masterbate (or go blind)", or "if you take a hit of marijuana, you'll die". etc. Their intentions are honorable, but they are trying to scare you from doing something that could hurt you.[/QUOTE]

By that logic, the Bible and/or religion is a set of lies to "scare us straight" -- albeit with honorable intentions. Yet, isn't lying a sin? That is a contradiction.

EDIT: you did say "kind of like when your parents...", so I guess it was just a bad example.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[quote=jsarno;270519]Funny you bring this up again. Cause you intentions are completely honorable right? So if you TRUELY beleive that my system CAN'T work, then why would you insist on someone taking their life savings and going to Vegas????????
Even though I shouldn't tell you, my wife and I have a plan on this next cruise that we are going to try. If it works, we might actually go down the road you speak of. Time will tell. It's hard to leave your comfort zone and your insurance.[/quote]

Sounds like lack of confidence in your system, to me.

A couple pages ago, you said "my system ALWAYS works." You even capitalized the word ALWAYS. If it always works, why are you uncomfortable with putting your savings on the line? If it ALWAYS works, there's no risk at all, and there's nothing to lose.

You're so full of crap.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

Schneed, jsarno hasn't done anything (that I've seen) to warrant your snide remarks.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[quote=cpayne5;270581]Schneed, jsarno hasn't done anything (that I've seen) to warrant your snide remarks.[/quote]

I disagree. He's trying to pump a roulette "system" that "Always works", while at the same time showing that he's afraid to try it with a significant amount of money on the line.

He has also said that he has written/is writing a book on this "system", and hopes one day to get it published.

That's part and parcel to crime in my opinion. Every gambling expert on Earth, including Donald Trump, knows that there is no way to consistently beat roulette. When I hear that someone plans on selling a book on how to make money when it's completely bogus, the first thing I think of is "con artist."

I think con artists are full of crap. And I'm not backing down from that stance.

If Jsarno was so confident in his system, he'd try it himself with something more significant than $5 on the line.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

I could care less about the roulette. The personal insults are what I believe to be out of line on your part.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[quote=cpayne5;270588]I could care less about the roulette. The personal insults are what I believe to be out of line on your part.[/quote]

I don't really care. I think it's warranted. If a mod slaps me on the wrist, so be it.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

[QUOTE=Schneed10;270589]I don't really care. I think it's warranted. If a mod slaps me on the wrist, so be it.[/QUOTE]

I wouldnt consider this a slap on the wrist, but everyone knows this was going to be a very sensitive thread to begin with, so just make sure no insults get thrown either way, because this will get out of hand real quick.

Re: Civil Discussion About Religion
 

i like to talk politics, but every political thread around here gets closed. is there really any difference between politics and this thread?