![]() |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Is this referring to the year we gave Haynesworth and Mcnabb the giant contracts? No matter the year, you can blame the front office. We all know Snyder's coworkers probably don't fall too far from the tree.
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=jwmann2;903288]Is this referring to the year we gave Haynesworth and Mcnabb the giant contracts? No matter the year, you can blame the front office. We all know Snyder's coworkers probably don't fall too far from the tree.[/quote]
No, you're way behind my friend. Has nothing to do with McNabb at all. It has to do with the Cowboys and Redskins spending a lot of money during the uncapped year and getting punished for it. |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=jwmann2;903288]Is this referring to the year we gave Haynesworth and Mcnabb the giant contracts? No matter the year, you can blame the front office. We all know Snyder's coworkers probably don't fall too far from the tree.[/quote]
It's from when we restructured Haynesworth and re-signed Hall to frontloaded contracts. |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=jwmann2;903288]Is this referring to the year we gave Haynesworth and Mcnabb the giant contracts? No matter the year, you can blame the front office. [B]We all know Snyder's coworkers probably don't fall too far from the tree.[/B][/quote]
Vinny is that you? |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=Giantone;903226]maybe ......and maybe not[/quote]
.., ! not sure about that .. , !!!! but maybe ?, :oink: :Smoker: |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=Lotus;903329]It's from when we restructured Haynesworth and re-signed Hall to frontloaded contracts.[/quote]
Exactly, Its amazing you listen on the radio and it seems no one knows whats the reason for it. |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=Pigskins;903287]I just don't see why any fan of another team would post on here???? I mean I like talking to other people about the skins, but I don't get on cowboys messaging boards. I have more of a life than that, honestly dude you need a gf, even if you make solid contributions I find it very weird, do you have accounts on all the NFC east boards?[/quote]
Has been asked and answerd before. |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the NFL owners meeting when this subject comes up for discussion. They should put it on Pay per View.
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/25/redskins-cowboys-file-grievance-against-nfl-nflpa/]Redskins, Cowboys file grievance against NFL, NFLPA | ProFootballTalk[/url]
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/25/cap-penalties-reportedly-getting-in-way-of-london-fletcher-deal/]Cap penalties reportedly getting in way of London Fletcher deal | ProFootballTalk[/url]
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Nice, I was wondering if it was just going to be lip service. NOW it's going to get interesting...
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=Mattyk;903529][URL="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/25/redskins-cowboys-file-grievance-against-nfl-nflpa/"]Redskins, Cowboys file grievance against NFL, NFLPA | ProFootballTalk[/URL][/quote]
Good. Even if it amounts to nothing, I'm hoping we can at least draw it out and expose and publicize the collusion. If nothing else, I'd like it to give Roger Goodell a black eye, so to speak. |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=Mattyk;903530][URL="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/25/cap-penalties-reportedly-getting-in-way-of-london-fletcher-deal/"]Cap penalties reportedly getting in way of London Fletcher deal | ProFootballTalk[/URL][/quote]
Question and I have ask this before, why sign some of the other free agents before Fletcher?Not getting into the whole penilty thing again but to me he should have been your #1 defensive priority,once you started to look at the defense he should have been first.I said it before I would love to see Fletcher with the Giants I think the guy is great. |
[QUOTE=Giantone;903543]Question and I have ask this before, why sign some of the other free agents before Fletcher?Not getting into the whole penilty thing again but to me he should have been your #1 defensive priority,once you started to look at the defense he should have been first.I said it before I would love to see Fletcher with the Giants I think the guy is great.[/QUOTE]
It's called priorities. A 25 or 26 year old trumps a 37 year old. :Smoker: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
[quote=Giantone;903543]Question and I have ask this before, why sign some of the other free agents before Fletcher?Not getting into the whole penilty thing again but to me he should have been your #1 defensive priority,once you started to look at the defense he should have been first.I said it before I would love to see Fletcher with the Giants I think the guy is great.[/quote]
,hamstringing your organization over someone who may or may not take your offer is not good business.. , lol, FA typically hits hot , n, heavy and if you dont make moves, you miss out... , !!!11 [IMG]http://www.forcesitaly.org/italy/immagini/classy_cigarette.gif[/IMG] |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.