![]() |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1198519]Media Bias, or Headline BS?
first headline on Yahoo homepage when I open it up Looking at that headline do you think that there is an impeachment trial of Trump already in progress? I really hate Headline writers, because I don't want to lump them in with media bias, I just think they are TMZ journalist wannabees[/quote] I never saw it, [url]https://www.yahoo.com/[/url] either of those stories. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1198519]Media Bias, or Headline BS?
first headline on Yahoo homepage when I open it up Looking at that headline do you think that there is an impeachment trial of Trump already in progress? I really hate Headline writers, because I don't want to lump them in with media bias, I just think they are TMZ journalist wannabees[/quote] No , this doesn't say a trial is already in progress,read it again. [url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-told-apos-countdown-082300421.html[/url] Politics Donald Trump has been warned the “countdown” to impeachment is underway, after his former lawyer implicated the president in crimes committed during the 2016 election. On Thursday, Mr Trump publicly addressed the prospect of impeachment for the first time, claiming the market would “crash” if his presidency was threatened. “I don't know how you can impeach somebody who has done a great job,” Mr Trump told Fox News. “I will tell you what, if I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash. I think everybody would be very poor because, without this thinking, you would see – you would see numbers that you wouldn't believe, in reverse.” Mr Trump’s comments came after Michael Cohen, his long-time legal “fixer”, pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including two counts of campaign finance violations, which he said he committed at the direction of the president. Video: Trump Claims ‘Market Would Crash’ If He Was Impeached Cohen admitted paying hush money to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both alleged to have had extramarital affairs with Mr Trump. Tom Cole, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, warned it was "too soon" to begin impeachment proceedings, but said: "If something comes out that is clear and convincing and impeachable, I think members will act." Al Green, a Democratic congressman who has previously filed articles of impeachment against Mr Trump, suggested he may do so again following Cohen’s guilty plea. "I think the president has to realise that the countdown to impeachment has already started,” he said. "He, at some point, will have to choose if he will face impeachment or if he will resign. It will be his choice. The congress will have no choice but to act.” "At some point, we have to act." |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1198532]No , this doesn't say a trial is already in progress,read it again.
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-told-apos-countdown-082300421.html[/url] Politics Donald Trump has been warned the “countdown” to impeachment is underway, after his former lawyer implicated the president in crimes committed during the 2016 election. On Thursday, Mr Trump publicly addressed the prospect of impeachment for the first time, claiming the market would “crash” if his presidency was threatened. “I don't know how you can impeach somebody who has done a great job,” Mr Trump told Fox News. “I will tell you what, if I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash. I think everybody would be very poor because, without this thinking, you would see – you would see numbers that you wouldn't believe, in reverse.” Mr Trump’s comments came after Michael Cohen, his long-time legal “fixer”, pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including two counts of campaign finance violations, which he said he committed at the direction of the president. Video: Trump Claims ‘Market Would Crash’ If He Was Impeached Cohen admitted paying hush money to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both alleged to have had extramarital affairs with Mr Trump. Tom Cole, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, warned it was "too soon" to begin impeachment proceedings, but said: "If something comes out that is clear and convincing and impeachable, I think members will act." Al Green, a Democratic congressman who has previously filed articles of impeachment against Mr Trump, suggested he may do so again following Cohen’s guilty plea. "I think the president has to realise that the countdown to impeachment has already started,” he said. "He, at some point, will have to choose if he will face impeachment or if he will resign. It will be his choice. The congress will have no choice but to act.” "At some point, we have to act."[/quote] I was only talking about the headline. I thought my post made that clear. Sorry if it wasn't |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1198519]Media Bias, or Headline BS?
first headline on Yahoo homepage when I open it up Looking at that headline do you think that there is an impeachment trial of Trump already in progress? I really hate Headline writers, because I don't want to lump them in with media bias, I just think they are TMZ journalist wannabees[/quote] I agree with this but it's nothing new and it's definitely not just a liberal or conservative thing. [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism[/URL] This thread needs to fucking die already. |
Re: Media Bias
[QUOTE=jamf;1198546]I agree with this but it's nothing new and it's definitely not just a liberal or conservative thing.
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism[/URL] This thread needs to fucking die already.[/QUOTE] I think the thread serves a purpose, but yeah headline abuse is just an annoying fact of life. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1198549]I think the thread serves a purpose, but yeah headline abuse is just an annoying fact of life.[/quote]
Having grown up in the NY suburban area I use to read about two to three papers a day. In the 60's and 70's there were a boat load of NY papers and NJ . Still the NY Post and the NY Daily News were the Kings of Headline BS. |
Re: Media Bias
This was fun ,I got 15 out of 17 !
[url]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/24/opinion/trump-gotti-quiz.html[/url] |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1198573]This was fun ,I got 15 out of 17 !
[url]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/24/opinion/trump-gotti-quiz.html[/url][/quote] 14 missed: “He doesn’t know me but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way.” “I, I don’t believe I’m lying.” “I would be a billionaire if I was looking to be a selfish boss. That’s not me.” 2 I said were trump, were gotti, 1 the other way. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1198577]14
missed: “He doesn’t know me but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way.” “I, I don’t believe I’m lying.” “I would be a billionaire if I was looking to be a selfish boss. That’s not me.” 2 I said were trump, were gotti, 1 the other way.[/quote] Two I said were Gotti ,were trump. |
Re: Media Bias
We have a thread for the media bias too. I never even noticed where these articles were listed. Clicked on these inadvertently.
|
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1198573]This was fun ,I got 15 out of 17 !
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/24/opinion/trump-gotti-quiz.html[/URL][/quote] 15 out of 17. The two I missed were "Love nobody, love nobody" and “I would be a billionaire if I was looking to be a selfish boss. That’s not me.” Both were Gotti, I said Trump. |
Re: Media Bias
[url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/27/cnn-stands-by-report-that-president-knew-about-trump-tower-meeting-as-cohen-lawyer-recants.html[/url]
A CNN report from July 27 headlined, “Cohen claims Trump knew in advance of 2016 Trump Tower meeting,” was co-bylined by Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein and Marshall Cohen. It cited “sources with knowledge” and noted that the ex-Trump lawyer is willing tell Special Counsel Robert Mueller that Trump knew of the meeting in advance, contradicting repeated denials by Trump and his surrogates. CNN’s report resulted in countless cable news segments and sent other news organizations scurrying to match. Among them was The Washington Post, which has since outed Cohen’s high-powered attorney Lanny Davis as its source -- while publishing an interview in which Davis backpedals. Davis told The Washington Post Sunday that he “should have been more clear” that he “could not independently confirm what happened.” Davis even told the Post he regrets his “error.” And this is why CNN is the biggest fake news source in the country. Completely embarrassing and why fake, biased news is very real in this country. Washington post confirms the source and calls out the bullshit. CNN is past the point of embarrassment stands by story bc they know how bad it looks. Lol...you can’t make this stuff up...well actually you can! Fake news alive and well. This is as an equal threat to our country as the president calling the press enemy of the people. |
Re: Media Bias
News is just unwatchable in general to me. I wish these news channels did more 1 on 1 debates with a reasonable person from each side of the issue with fair/balanced moderator(s). I think people would get a lot out of that and could actually learn some things about the other sides position that is presented in a way where its balanced with your own position.
|
Re: Media Bias
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1198837]News is just unwatchable in general to me. I wish these news channels did more 1 on 1 debates with a reasonable person from each side of the issue with fair/balanced moderator(s). I think people would get a lot out of that and could actually learn some things about the other sides position that is presented in a way where its balanced with your own position.[/quote]
gotta say, you do sound to sensible for these threads! |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1198850]gotta say, you do sound to sensible for these threads![/quote]
I try my best. I think I usually do a fairly good job, especially considering I'm a racist, misogynistic, puppy kicking, conservative son of a bitch. |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://jezebel.com/reports-say-nbc-tried-to-kill-weinstein-story-threaten-1828734018[/url]
“Reports Say NBC Tried to Kill Weinstein Story, Threatened Ronan Farrow” Of course they did. This is fucking disgusting...lawyers threatened Farrow. When it comes to misogyny, sexual harassment the liberal media and Hollywood lead the way....what is it now 85% - 15% for the libs? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1199069][url]https://jezebel.com/reports-say-nbc-tried-to-kill-weinstein-story-threaten-1828734018[/url]
“Reports Say NBC Tried to Kill Weinstein Story, Threatened Ronan Farrow” Of course they did. This is fucking disgusting...lawyers threatened Farrow. When it comes to misogyny, sexual harassment the liberal media and Hollywood lead the way....what is it now 85% - 15% for the libs?[/quote] I'm going to pull a CRed on you, You need a better source than a womens blog quoting the daily beast. But yes, Hollywood (Film and Music) and Fashion have been covering some fucked up shit. But then again, they aren't elected officials trying to pass off their racist/sexist agenda as some religious bullshit. Edited: engrish |
Re: Media Bias
Not Surprising .............
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trouble-trump-disapproval-high-63-back-mueller-half-112416277--abc-news-topstories.html[/url] Trouble for Trump: Disapproval at a high, 63% back Mueller, half favor impeachment originally appeared on abcnews.go.com Disapproval of Donald Trump is at a new high, support for the Mueller investigation is broad and half of Americans in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll favor Congress initiating impeachment proceedings against the president. Sixty percent in the national survey disapprove of Trump’s performance in office, numerically the highest of his presidency, albeit by a single point; that includes 53 percent who disapprove strongly, more than half for the first time. Thirty-six percent approve, matching his low. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1199076]Not Surprising .............
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trouble-trump-disapproval-high-63-back-mueller-half-112416277--abc-news-topstories.html[/url] Trouble for Trump: Disapproval at a high, 63% back Mueller, half favor impeachment originally appeared on abcnews.go.com Disapproval of Donald Trump is at a new high, support for the Mueller investigation is broad and half of Americans in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll favor Congress initiating impeachment proceedings against the president. Sixty percent in the national survey disapprove of Trump’s performance in office, numerically the highest of his presidency, albeit by a single point; that includes 53 percent who disapprove strongly, more than half for the first time. Thirty-six percent approve, matching his low.[/quote] shocking that it's the abc/wapo poll - which might tend a little biased one way, another one, Rasmussen (that biases the other way), has his approval hovering around 48 or 49% [URL="https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html#polls"]RCP POLLS[/URL] does a great job of tracking the individual polls and running averages. AND when you focus in on the economy, the results show he's getting decent credit for "obama's economy" [quote]Poll Date Sample [COLOR="Blue"]Approve[/COLOR] Disapprove Spread RCP Average 6/14 - 8/28 -- [COLOR="Blue"]50.0[/COLOR] 42.3 +7.7 Economist/YouGov 8/26 - 8/28 1249 RV [COLOR="Blue"]49[/COLOR] 43 +6 Reuters/Ipsos 8/22 - 8/28 3550 A [COLOR="Blue"]47[/COLOR] 44 +3 Harvard-Harris 8/22 - 8/23 1330 RV [COLOR="Blue"]55[/COLOR] 45 +10 FOX News 8/19 - 8/21 1009 RV [COLOR="Blue"]49[/COLOR] 44 +5 Quinnipiac 7/18 - 7/23 1177 RV [COLOR="Blue"]49[/COLOR] 47 +2 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 7/15 - 7/18 900 RV [COLOR="Blue"]50[/COLOR] 34 +16 CNBC 6/16 - 6/19 800 A [COLOR="Blue"]51[/COLOR] 36 +15 CNN 6/14 - 6/17 901 RV [COLOR="Blue"]51[/COLOR] 42 +9[/quote] ( I hate cut and pasting tables on this site!!) also from RCP - President Obama's approval - 2014 : [quote]Reuters/Ipsos 9/3 - 9/7 1758 A [COLOR="Blue"]39[/COLOR] 53 -14.0 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 9/3 - 9/7 1000 RV [COLOR="Blue"]40[/COLOR] 54 -14.0 Reuters/Ipsos 8/30 - 9/3 1811 A [COLOR="Blue"]38[/COLOR] 56 -18.0 The Economist/YouGov 8/30 - 9/1 729 RV [COLOR="Blue"]41[/COLOR] 56 -15.0 GWU/Battleground 8/23 - 8/28 1000 LV [COLOR="Blue"]44[/COLOR] 51 -7.0 The Economist/YouGov 8/23 - 8/25 683 RV [COLOR="Blue"]43[/COLOR] 56 -13.0 Reuters/Ipsos 8/20 - 8/24 1497 A [COLOR="Blue"]38[/COLOR] 54 -16.0[/quote] |
Re: Media Bias
I think there is little doubt this mid-term House of Representatives election will be a referendum on Trump, but, and this is in anticipation of the media's spin headlines, the Senate is going to be a win for the Democrats simply because they have so many locked up seats that are having meaningless elections.
The big questions will be if the HofRep turns, and/or if the Senate flips. But even if the Republicans keep both the media will be running stories like "Big Blue Wave Misses Chance To Flip Congress" |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1199080]shocking that it's the abc/wapo poll - which might tend a little biased one way, another one, Rasmussen (that biases the other way), has his approval hovering around 48 or 49%
[URL="https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html#polls"]RCP POLLS[/URL] does a great job of tracking the individual polls and running averages. AND when you focus in on the economy, the results show he's getting decent credit for "obama's economy" ( I hate cut and pasting tables on this site!!) also from RCP - President Obama's approval - 2014 :[/quote] Really, that is the best you can do ....an Obama deflection??? As I said before the media is not as bias as you are. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1199097]Really, that is the best you can do ....an Obama deflection???
As I said before the media is not as bias as you are.[/quote] It's not an Obama deflection, it's an equivalence, you want to go pull a Bush poll? You can't say a president is in serious trouble, when the president before him had an equivalently poor unfavorable rating at the same point in his term. Sorry you can't understand the simplest comparisons. You are correct about the fact that I am biased and I acknowledge my bias, let CNN and others who have waged all out media war on those in this country who believe in being fiscally conservative ideals and in US exceptionalism, acknowledge their socialist liberal leanings but they don't. And they won't. Have I ever declared myself non-partisan?? No. I hold strong conservative and libertarian beliefs, I believe the Constitution and the first 10 amendments are the greatest single establishment of government this world has ever witnessed. I think that the US government has simple fundamental duties expressly designed to LIMIT the federal power. AND, I believe that liberalism, and it's inherent lean towards socialism and federal power will in the long run doom that Constitution if enough people fall for the media chirping. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1199098]It's not an Obama deflection, it's an equivalence, you want to go pull a Bush poll? You can't say a president is in serious trouble, when the president before him had an equivalently poor unfavorable rating at the same point in his term. Sorry you can't understand the simplest comparisons.
You are correct about the fact that I am biased and I acknowledge my bias, let CNN and others who have waged all out media war on those in this country who believe in being fiscally conservative ideals and in US exceptionalism, acknowledge their socialist liberal leanings but they don't. And they won't. Have I ever declared myself non-partisan?? No. I hold strong conservative and libertarian beliefs, I believe the Constitution and the first 10 amendments are the greatest single establishment of government this world has ever witnessed. I think that the US government has simple fundamental duties expressly designed to LIMIT the federal power. AND, I believe that liberalism, and it's inherent lean towards socialism and federal power will in the long run doom that Constitution if enough people fall for the media chirping.[/quote] Great speech, Bravo !!! I am all for your right to have different political beliefs than mine or anyone's. But your argument that I can't pull a poll that says 60% of American doesn't trust the president is BS . We are not talking Obama here ,this is all about trump and his ignorance and the fact that his cult is running out of excuse's for him,hell they are just ignoring his corruption at a great cost to this country but hey ........fuck America at least trump is president,right? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1199108]Great speech, Bravo !!! I am all for your right to have different political beliefs than mine or anyone's.
But your argument that I can't pull a poll that says 60% of American doesn't trust the president is BS . We are not talking Obama here ,this is all about trump and his ignorance and the fact that his cult is running out of excuse's for him,hell they are just ignoring his corruption at a great cost to this country but hey ........fuck America at least trump is president,right?[/quote] Do you get a dollar everytime you say cult? Geez louise, every post of yours is the exact same. I wouldn't discuss what light beer is the worst with you. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1199109]Do you get a dollar everytime you say cult? Geez louise, every post of yours is the exact same. I wouldn't discuss what light beer is the worst with you.[/quote]
What is funny, is that his repeated mantra like calls of cultism are far more cult-like behavior than me, or anyone else, expressing our opinions in support of a politician or political policies. s/n, always remember he is a self proclaimed Republican so take everything with a grain of salt. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1199116]What is funny, is that his repeated mantra like calls of cultism are far more cult-like behavior than me, or anyone else, expressing our opinions in support of a politician or political policies.
s/n, always remember he is a self proclaimed Republican so take everything with a grain of salt.[/quote] #triggered :lol: |
Re: Media Bias
[/QUOTE]s/n, always remember he is a self proclaimed Republican so take everything with a grain of salt.[/QUOTE]
And I'm actually Elvis reincarnated. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1199144][/quote]s/n, always remember he is a self proclaimed Republican so take everything with a grain of salt.[/QUOTE]
And I'm actually Elvis reincarnated.[/QUOTE] See, ..now that is cool! |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1199116]What is funny, is that his repeated mantra like calls of cultism are far more cult-like behavior than me, or anyone else, expressing our opinions in support of a politician or political policies.
[/quote] Again you go the trump cult way and use "alternative facts". It would be wonderful if you expressed your political opinions but you don't you and chico both stand by trump and refuse to ever acknowledge anything he has done wrong..............never have you once said trump was wrong . Yeah it's a cult and there isn't any spin or insult you can through out there to change it. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1199148]Again you go the trump cult way and use "alternative facts". It would be wonderful if you expressed your political opinions but you don't [B]you[/B] and chico both [B]stand by trump and refuse to ever acknowledge anything he has done wrong[/B]..............never have you once said trump was wrong . Yeah it's a cult and there isn't any spin or insult you can through out there to change it.[/quote]
I actually understand how you could think that from the interactions on the Warpath, but it's not really the case. I am disappointed by the failure to create outreaches to LGBT community and the inner cities. I would rather that he push forward with marijuana legalization rather then letting the DOJ impede it. Believe it or not, I disagree with him about military spending, but bottomline, none of my disagreements outweigh the majority of the policies that I do agree with. As for Trump personally, I don't like him, and I wish there had been a libertarian voice that could have implemented the fiscal and regulatory policies I agree with, while also protecting every citizen's freedoms. The Libertarian candidate looked promising until their convention and his Aleppo fiasco. Back to Trump, as a speaker, I can barely listen to Trump's self-aggrandizement style, and I look at most of his tweeting/rhetoric as just that political rhetoric, not written policy statements. But I do agree with a lot of his fiscal and regulatory policies, and I defend him here on those, because those are important to me, and there are more than enough voices that throw out the negatives. |
Re: Media Bias
ROFL. At least Fox News is now admitting they radicalized Trump.
[url]https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2018/08/30/fox-host-brags-trump-was-radicalized-network/221156[/url] |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=NC_Skins;1199180]ROFL. At least Fox News is now admitting they radicalized Trump.
[url]https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2018/08/30/fox-host-brags-trump-was-radicalized-network/221156[/url][/quote] Wouldn't be surprising. I'm currently reading Omarosa's book (about halfway through, brief synopsis "through all the red flags, I stood by him because he'd always had my back, until he didn't") but one of the interesting points I read was about the daily communications between the campaign team and Fox News. Fox News appeared to be one of the major sources of info that was getting distributed to the campaign team in their daily briefings. And we all know even to this day Trump and Hannity are pretty tight. |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/researchers-posed-as-trolls-bought-google-ads[/url]
"[B]This Group Posed As Russian Trolls And Bought Political Ads On Google. It Was Easy[/B]" Why Social media is the enemy of the people too. In the summer of 2018, after months of public and legislator outcry over election interference, you might think it would be difficult for a Russian troll farm to purchase — with Russian currency, from a Russian ZIP code — racially and politically divisive ads through Google. And you might reasonably assume that if such a troll farm were able to do this, Google — which has said "no amount of interference that is acceptable" — would prevent it from successfully targeting those ads toward thousands of Americans on major news sites and YouTube channels. But you’d be wrong. Researchers from the advocacy group the Campaign for Accountability — which has frequently targeted Google with its “transparency project” investigations and has received funding from Google competitor Oracle — posed as Kremlin-linked trolls and successfully purchased divisive online ads using Google’s ad platform and targeted them toward Americans. [B] The advertisements appeared on the YouTube channels and websites of media brands like CNN, CBS This Morning, HuffPost, and the Daily Beast.[/B] These in bold aren't honest, fair, and actively participate in dividing the nation for revenue. They run fake ads with their fake news. [B]Here's proof again[/B]. |
Re: Media Bias
Well that's pretty shit Chico. If true and Google is just letting anyone buy ads and put anything up it really goes against what they're preaching about letting fake news spread.
I'd also like to add an additional point about how stupid, we, the American people (not just the right) are becoming if we actually believe those ads. It really doesn't paint people in a favorable light if they can't look at that nonsense and tell fact from fiction. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1199400]Well that's pretty shit Chico. If true and Google is just letting anyone buy ads and put anything up it really goes against what they're preaching about letting fake news spread.
I'd also like to add an additional point about how stupid, we, the American people (not just the right) are becoming if we actually believe those ads. It really doesn't paint people in a favorable light if they can't look at that nonsense and tell fact from fiction.[/quote] 60 mins report on fake news which was done probably 8 months ago said [B]Education level did not matter when people read fake as well political leanings[/B]....That was my biggest take away from that excellent piece by Scott Pelley. Think about that...when people believe fake news it does not matter about how smart/dumb you are or if you are Republican/Democrat....So its an emotional response based on bias and what the person [B]wants[/B] to believe. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1199400][B]Well that's pretty shit Chico[/B]. If true and Google is just letting anyone buy ads and put anything up it really goes against what they're preaching about letting fake news spread.
I'd also like to add an additional point about how stupid, we, the American people (not just the right) are becoming if we actually believe those ads. It really doesn't paint people in a favorable light if they can't look at that nonsense and tell fact from fiction.[/quote] I agree. You would think these companies would have top Quality Controls across all industries...Obviously not. Fundamentally you have to ask yourself, if Google doesn't...then what? This isn't a good look. Welp, here you go: [url]https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/05/technology/facebook-twitter-senate-intelligence-committee/index.html[/url] Senators blast Google for no-show on Capitol Hill |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1199402]60 mins report on fake news which was done probably 8 months ago said [B]Education level did not matter when people read fake as well political leanings[/B]....That was my biggest take away from that excellent piece by Scott Pelley.
Think about that...when people believe fake news it does not matter about how smart/dumb you are or if you are Republican/Democrat....So its an emotional response based on bias and what the person [B]wants[/B] to believe.[/quote] 'Personal Bias", ............now who has been saying that??? [url]http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=63898&page=83[/url] post #1232 |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/09/04/that-was-no-white-power-hand-signal-at-the-kavanaugh-hearing-zina-bashs-husband-says/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cff1c838115d[/url]
[B]That was no white-power hand signal at the Kavanaugh hearing[/B] More conspiracy theory and fake news from twitter, fucking amazing how dumb the alt left is... I see the continuing conspiracy theories of Justice Kennedy's old seat still raging on... This is good example of how fake news that is so obviously absurd can go viral and retards actually believe this stuff. You must be a hardcore loser to say and retweet this shit |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1199420][url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/09/04/that-was-no-white-power-hand-signal-at-the-kavanaugh-hearing-zina-bashs-husband-says/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cff1c838115d[/url]
[B]That was no white-power hand signal at the Kavanaugh hearing[/B] More conspiracy theory and fake news from twitter, fucking amazing how dumb the alt left is... I see the continuing conspiracy theories of Justice Kennedy's old seat still raging on... This is good example of how fake news that is so obviously absurd can go viral and retards actually believe this stuff. You must be a hardcore loser to say and retweet this shit[/quote] No the WP was actually saying it did not happen,don't confuse some blogger and a real media outlet .Look at what trump tweets and we know he lies, I see no outrage about him? |
Re: Media Bias
All the outlets I have seen so far are all saying there was no WHITE POWER sign. So it looks like the 'real media" is getting it right . Seems like more personal bias to me.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.