![]() |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=tshile;1083166]Chris Russel, among others, reporting Griffin has no fracture, does not need surgery.[/quote]
I wanna see the guy recover but it just makes the question bigger that we know he will in fact return midseason. If kirk beats Seattle i know who my guy is Without a shadow of a doubt. But like he said lets get past Philly first. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=Skins4L;1083168]I wanna see the guy recover but it just makes the question bigger that we know he will in fact return midseason. If kirk beats Seattle i know who my guy is Without a shadow of a doubt. But like he said lets get past Philly first.[/quote]
Yeah, we got philly on the road and giants at home first. One game at a time. I don't care who they put back there, I just want it to be the best person to help win the game. I don't care who's feelings/ego it hurts. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1083160]You guys are getting waaaaay ahead of yourselves. lol. Let's just try and beat the Eagles first.[/QUOTE]
Come on man? The real question is who is going to Disneyworld? Griff or Kirk? |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=Chico23231;1083151]Keim reporting No fracture in the ankle for RG3. Thats a positive[/quote]
Any word if the MRI showed torn major ligaments? That is much worse than fracture. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
Im much more concerned at the present moment with DJax and the others that were injured. Should have Reed back soon rite? Also BM coming back. Without getting into Griff vs Kirk - I will just say that rite now I am comfortable with Kirk being our QB. Very comfortable.
|
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=Defensewins;1083171]Any word if the MRI showed torn major ligaments?
That is much worse than fracture.[/quote] yeah, thats the first hurddle. MRI is next on the ligaments. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
Wouldn't they do x-rays at the stadium? Don't need an MRI to tell you if there are fractures. The MRI is to look at the soft tissue.
|
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=punch it in;1083172]Im much more concerned at the present moment with DJax and the others that were injured. Should have Reed back soon rite? Also BM coming back. Without getting into Griff vs Kirk - I will just say that rite now I am comfortable with Kirk being our QB. Very comfortable.[/quote]
Meriweather back should really help. Rambo's had a big hand in both of the TD's the defense has allowed. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
I believe swelling immediately following injury makes in-stadium XRay and other tests not really useful.
But this is far from something I'm knowledgeable about. :) |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=Chico23231;1083173]yeah, thats the first hurddle. MRI is next on the ligaments.[/quote]
If an MRI has not been done yet, then I wonder why "Chris Russel, among others, reporting Griffin has no fracture, [B]does not need surgery[/B]." If the major ligament in the ankle is torn and he expects to play football again he needs surgery. Otherwise his ankle will be so weak he will be twisting his ankle all the time and he risks more severe injury. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[quote=SirLK26;1083164]Right now I picture Mike Shanahan something like this...
[IMG]http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/popcorn_2.gif[/IMG][/quote] :laughing-:laughing2 |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[QUOTE=tshile;1083176]I believe swelling immediately following injury makes in-stadium XRay and other tests not really useful.
But this is far from something I'm knowledgeable about. :)[/QUOTE] Maybe, but swelling is often worse the next day. Although I'm sure he's been icing the crap out if it. Who knows. I was just kinda wondering out loud. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
1 game at a time, lets see who is healthy for Philly, lot of other injuries besides RG3.
|
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
[QUOTE=Defensewins;1083177]If an MRI has not been done yet, then I wonder why "Chris Russel, among others, reporting Griffin has no fracture, [B]does not need surgery[/B]."
If the major ligament in the ankle is torn and he expects to play football again he needs surgery. Otherwise his ankle will be so weak he will be twisting his ankle all the time and he risks more severe injury.[/QUOTE] I think some are jumping the gun a bit. No surgery needed for a fracture, but that's only half the story. |
Re: Skins-Jags Positives and Negatives
One thing I noticed was that 2 or 3 times, Roberts fielded a punt with a defender a bit too close. It never cost him a turnover, this time. I like playmakers, but when got a lead you got to play smart and not take dumb risks. Sometimes it is okay just to take the fair catch.
And all 10 points the defense allowed was because of two plays where the safeties blew the coverage. I don't know if they were going for the INT or what, but when you got a lead and you are the last line of defense you just can't be in front of the receiver. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.