Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

he's not as fast as santana and his ball reaction isn't as good. he'll have an immediate impact though.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

i wonder if santana is gonna be upset at ST after he de-cletes his lil bro and for how long?

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

Does anyone else think that Sinorice's draft stock was helped by Santana's outstanding 2005 season just a bit??

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

[quote=Mattyk72]Does anyone else think that Sinorice's draft stock was helped by Santana's outstanding 2005 season just a bit??[/quote]

yes, very much... not by anyone moreso than the giants who watched him put up 160 yards and 3 tds on them in one game.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

Does anyone know if the Giants have any D-Ends?

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

[QUOTE=Dirtbag359]Does anyone know if the Giants have any D-Ends?[/QUOTE]

they still have Strahan and Umenyiora and then drafted Kiwanuka from Boston College so yeah I'd say they have some DEs.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

The middle of the Giants D is the biggest joke ever. Particularly the D line and Safeties. Not Pierce.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

AND JUSTIN TUCK. Man sucks to be a Giants fan. Its going to be fun watching the Moss bowl twice a year (or at least hearing about it), since I know whos going to win.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

Their CBs suck too.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

[QUOTE] Mattyk72 Does anyone else think that Sinorice's draft stock was helped by Santana's outstanding 2005 season just a bit?? [/QUOTE]
man! you took the words and thoughts right outta my mouth. his bro helped his stock as well as other smallish wr. he cetainly appears to belong at this level but he got a few extra duckies in his pocket because of the play of smaller wr in 05.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

Actually I think you also have to throw a little thanks Steve Smiths way too. On top of that the 5 yard rule hasn't excactly hurt small recievers.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

I really, really, don't understand why the giants took mathias kiwanuku. It's not like they don't have one of the best starting defensive end tandems in the league. And plus they just drafted Tuck last year. I dunno, maybe they thought their 3rd string defensive end depth is pretty bad, so they should stock up on it.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

[quote=mooby]I really, really, don't understand why the giants took mathias kiwanuku. It's not like they don't have one of the best starting defensive end tandems in the league. And plus they just drafted Tuck last year. I dunno, maybe they thought their 3rd string defensive end depth is pretty bad, so they should stock up on it.[/quote]

maybe they think MK can replace trahan and tuck can't... its not like they have lots of obvious gaping holes... mosts guys had them taking a RB for depth or WR there (and they got their guy at WR anyways).

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]eagles pickups were much more significant.[/QUOTE]

Undoubtedly. I think they got the most value from their picks. While the Jets made out well too, the Eagles got the most value from their picks. The only team that might have done better is the Cardinals.

Re: G-men take Sinorice
 

[QUOTE=mooby]I really, really, don't understand why the giants took mathias kiwanuku. It's not like they don't have one of the best starting defensive end tandems in the league. And plus they just drafted Tuck last year. I dunno, maybe they thought their 3rd string defensive end depth is pretty bad, so they should stock up on it.[/QUOTE]

They've got Tuck, but Strahan has 2 seasons left. Kiwanuka could be a geat pick; he was projected to go high in the 1st round before his sub-par senior season.