![]() |
Re: Who is number #2
[quote=RobH4413;209084]Campbell does look slow on reads. Is he poised? Yes. But He isn't anywhere near game speed yet. He has progressed, but he seems to be slow on looking at the defense, a staple of Al Saunders' offense. I'd say Campbell is a #2 because Todd Collins is worthless.
I'd prefer Brunell to stay healthy.[/quote] I would much rather have Campbell than Collins at second string. |
Re: Who is number #2
how in the hell has collins stayed in this league this long? hell, i can carry a clipboard . and as of today, i have 0 interceptions
|
Re: Who is number #2
[quote=dmek25;209102]how in the hell has collins stayed in this league this long? hell, i can carry a clipboard . and as of today, i have 0 interceptions[/quote]
Thats the funniest thing I have heard all day, I saw those numbers and I was all holy crap dude, If collins can get in the NFL So can I. Honestly I wish they posted my stats from last year, I have a better rating than him and I ride the bench at La Verne! |
Re: Who is number #2
[QUOTE=RobH4413;209084]Campbell does look slow on reads. Is he poised? Yes. But He isn't anywhere near game speed yet. He has progressed, but he seems to be slow on looking at the defense, a staple of Al Saunders' offense. I'd say Campbell is a #2 because Todd Collins is worthless.
I'd prefer Brunell to stay healthy.[/QUOTE] I agree. I still think Brunell gives us the best chance at winning. |
Re: Who is number #2
Campbell should be #1. He is definitely #2.
I don't care that Brunell has been fed to the lions by Saunders. Campbell has simply looked like the most cool and comfortable QB this pre-season. I want to see with the 1st team offense! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.