Re: Make ARE the #2 receiver...
 

[quote=TAFKAS;240089]Props to the front office I suppose for making sure we had "too many" receivers for a day like yesterday.

Now if my main man Patten can just take the field...[/quote]
tafkas, why didnt patten play?

Re: Make ARE the #2 receiver...
 

[quote=dmek25;240188]tafkas, why didnt patten play?[/quote]


Patten I believe was out with a hamstring injury.

Re: Make ARE the #2 receiver...
 

[QUOTE=dmek25;240188]tafkas, why didnt patten play?[/QUOTE]

He wanted to keep Moss company on the sidelines

Re: Make ARE the #2 receiver...
 

To shield Moss so that Brunell couldn't see him and STILL try to throw him the pass.

Re: Make ARE the #2 receiver...
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection;240208]To shield Moss so that Brunell couldn't see him and STILL try to throw him the pass.[/QUOTE]

Seriously, I kept waiting for MB to chuck one at the sideline just b/c.

Re: Make ARE the #2 receiver...
 

it's weird that we gave up so much for duckett, and paid so much to patten and archuleta, and none of them are going to be playing much at all.

i mean, carter still sucks, but at least he's making SOME progress. he wasn't a total embarassment yesterday.