Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=19566)

MTK 09-02-2007 01:18 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
[quote=JoeRedskin;346429]Apparently we kept more second day draft choices than the brilliant NE Patriots. Admittedly, it is probably harder to crack their squad BUT for those griping that every pick isn't on the squad - apparently that happened on more than one or two teams this year.

• The Patriots apparently didn't like this draft. Only two choices -- safety Brandon Meriweather and defensive end Kareem Brown -- made the 53-man roster. The Patriots cut four second-day choices and placed two more on injured reserve; another was waived because of injury. From the start of camp, teams were hearing the Patriots weren't going to keep many of their second-day selections. For them, it's wait until next year.

Here is the whole article - according to Clayton, a lot of draft choices didn't make the cut.
[URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp07/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=3001363"]ESPN - Clayton: Cuts in all shapes and sizes - NFL[/URL][/quote]

Nice post.

JWsleep 09-02-2007 02:30 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
We cut those guys because we have depth at LB and (yes, believe it or not) at QB. Plus, Startz is hurt and Palmer will be on the practice squad.

Not a bad draft, IMO.

paulskinsfan 09-02-2007 03:52 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
[quote=JWsleep;346486]We cut those guys because we have depth at LB and (yes, believe it or not) at QB. Plus, Startz is hurt and Palmer will be on the practice squad.

Not a bad draft, IMO.[/quote]


We had 2 guys from our entire draft make the team, Id call it a bad draft, especially after our front office had no picks rounds 2-4.

saden1 09-02-2007 04:15 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
[quote=paulskinsfan;346500]We had 2 guys from our entire draft make the team, Id call it a bad draft, especially after our front office had no picks rounds 2-4.[/quote]


What about undrafted players making the team?

paulskinsfan 09-02-2007 04:20 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
[quote=saden1;346509]What about undrafted players making the team?[/quote]


Well we can interpret that 2 ways, either our scouting did a kick ass job with UDFA OR, our team's backups were just that weak. Jury is still out on that one, but our draft was not good.

paulskinsfan 09-02-2007 04:21 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
But that being said, I do really really like HB Blades.

bertoskins2 09-03-2007 11:02 AM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
we got future pro bowl in landry.......I dont care if others dont make it.........this is gibbs style get establish FA and get probowl players in the first round

TheMalcolmConnection 09-03-2007 11:38 AM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
Daseal and I were talking on IM about the draft this morning and we cannot understand why people bitch and moan about draft picks not working out. Just as was mentioned above, no one shoots 100% in the draft and if you even have a 25% success rate in the later rounds, you should consider that a success.

Even the smarter of GMs and coaches can't find the starting talent in the sixth or seventh rounds.

That Guy 09-03-2007 11:55 AM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
we had a good draft as long as landry shows up. blades and heyer are extra. UDFAs count as part of the draft class in my eyes, cause someone had to go out and find them.

JoeRedskin 09-03-2007 12:17 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
Well, if we say it was a good draft/FA class then the whole "we need a GM" and "Our FO stinks" arguments lose some of their weight - and we can't let that happen now can we??

The FO makes lots of mistakes but sometimes it gets things right. A star safety, a solid LB and a young LT with potential to start down the road. Damn fine group. Add to all that, Wilson and Mason for depth - and 2007 looks pretty nice for adding young players.

Considering some had doomed us before the draft, I think they did fine - not brilliant, not completely stupid either.

jsarno 09-03-2007 12:29 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
So where are all those people that said Sartz should be starting this year and Palmer could be our #2?

JoeRedskin 09-03-2007 12:40 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
Wow - who was saying that??

T.O.Killa 09-03-2007 12:43 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
I cant remember anyone ever saying Sartz should start or Palmer will be #2.

That Guy 09-03-2007 02:55 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
every year people seem to get caught up with crappy players... ie: start hasslebeck (tim not matt), espy should start, mccullough is a star running back (who?) etc etc.... there didn't seem to be much of that this year though, which is really nice.

of course, i've been out most of this offseason with various crap ;)

TheMalcolmConnection 09-03-2007 03:37 PM

Re: Draft Class of 2007 Very Poor
 
I still think Espy has a future with the team. I'd love to see what he can do if he started a few games.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.68627 seconds with 9 queries