Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

Make sure you guys remember I said this [B]week 1 Jeremy Bridges will be the starting RT, [/B] Heyer will be backing up at RT & LT, Jansen will be back up RT & C

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=ChickenMonkey;554472]Make sure you guys remember I said this [B]week 1 Jeremy Bridges will be the starting RT, [/B] Heyer will be backing up at RT & LT, Jansen will be back up RT & C[/quote]

penciling this in my notebook as we speak

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=53Fan;554433]To sign as many players w/o contracts as cheap as we can and let Buges sort it out.[/quote]

I think you said something then sir

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=GTripp0012;554430]Don't understand what the plan is with the OL anymore, but we have no shortage of warm bodies, that's for sure.[/quote]

Maybe you're looking for something that isn't there. Without Dock falling into their laps do you really think the FO would have signed any real OL talent this off-season?

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=Nflnick11;554415]Could this be the answer at RT we re looking for??[/quote]

I doubt it.. Williams will probably be if He can get into shape.. The guy is hella-strong, with good lateral movement. We need bridges just in case Thomas goes down or to just plug a hole though.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=GTripp0012;554430]Don't understand what the plan is with the OL anymore, but we have no shortage of warm bodies, that's for sure.[/quote]

Joe Jacoby was an undrafted free agent signing..

the best scenario..Heyer starting..and not looking over his shoulder..
the O-line will mesh...

the Skins were so right in building the Defense they way they have..a pedestrian offense can win with them...but a pedestrian offense will put both Zorn and Campbell on very shaky ground

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=gw0103;554547]I doubt it.. Williams will probably be if He can get into shape.. The guy is hella-strong, with good lateral movement. We need bridges just in case Thomas goes down or to just plug a hole though.[/quote]

I agree, I think Williams is the best option at rt. Bridges was good here in Carolina, and they really liked him for his versatility. I think he will be a good back up at guard. Heyer to me has had 2yrs for fo to see what he can do and I don't think he has performed well. He won't be the starting rt this year.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

He signed today.

[url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/skins-sign-bridges-1.html]Redskins Insider - Skins Sign Bridges[/url]

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

I like this. He has anger issues, which I like in a football player, could potentially land a job and he has an NFL resume.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=Pocket$ $traight;555171]I like this. He has anger issues, which I like in a football player, could potentially land a job and he has an NFL resume.[/quote]
He needs to keep his shit together; there's a lot more trouble that you can get into in DC than Charlotte.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

Just have to keep him away from alcohol. He's one of those guys who is sweet when sober but hell on wheels when tanked.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=tryfuhl;555173]He needs to keep his shit together; there's a lot more trouble that you can get into in DC than Charlotte.[/quote]

Yeah, but fewer strip clubs. lol. regulate his alcohol and let him learn from Buges and release his frustrations on opponants.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

If he can stay out of trouble and focus on football I would put my early money on him being the starting RT come opening day.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=Mattyk72;555225][B]If he can stay out of trouble[/B] and focus on football I would put my early money on him being the starting RT come opening day.[/quote]

Thats the key, especially since DC is a bigger city than Charlotte, which provides more distractions.

Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
 

[quote=vallin21;555242]Thats the key, especially since DC is a bigger city than Charlotte, which provides more distractions.[/quote]

I have lived in both. I don't necessarily think that DC is going to have more distractions. More people are assholes up here and have a inflated level of self-worth so it might be easier to get into an argument but then again most of them don't have a spine so they back down pretty quickly.

If you hang around the wrong people or find the wrong part of town in any city you will get into trouble.

P.S. As far as the strip clubs, I think they are better in Charlotte. You can have lap dances (If there is a club in DC with lap dances let me know!). And definitely no pasties like the Commonwealth...