Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=Mattyk;663528]There has been no official word on changing to the 3-4, but it's safe to assume based on Haslett's past that at the very least we'll see some [B]3-4 looks from the D this year.[/B][/quote]

More of a hybrid of both. But we can't go 3-4 with these things to worry about.


-Andre Carter was horrible at being an OLB. He just had his best career at DE and is at his best with his hand on the dirt.

-Albert Haynesworth( does not wan't to be an full time DE).We don't wanna anger a top 3 DT who is still the best today at that position.

-We have no NT and won't be any in free agency. Even if we did what happens if our staring NT gets injured ....

-London Flecther doesn't wanna do a 3-4 I hear.( I think)or fits as one.

-New defensive scheme all around. Takes atleast a year to produce.

-No other ILB to help out Flecther right now.


I don't see us going 3-4. I see the Leo Little tho a campaign guy to replace Phillip Daniels or become good depth on good pass rushing downs. I don't see why we should go 3-4 out of a sudden but I do see some hybrid of it.


This overall should be the best defense Haslett ever had. I wouldn't mind seeing Jason Taylor come back on pass rushing downs either. I was a big fan of his .

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

You can play AH at any spot on a 3-4 front.

Fletcher has already said he's down with a 3-4 if the team goes to it.

[url=http://fredericksburg.com/blogs/view?blogger_id=40&p=1264622017]Fredericksburg.com - London Fletcher on the 3-4 defense|Rich Campbell[/url]

[SIZE=2]"I can play in whatever defense," he said. "I feel comfortable in a 4-3, obviously. I feel comfortable in a 3-4. Whatever they want to do."[/SIZE]

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=Mattyk;663540][B]You can play AH at any spot on a 3-4 front.[/B]

Fletcher has already said he's down with a 3-4 if the team goes to it.[/quote]

Even NT?

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

First of all, this isn't a PFT story, as in PFT didn't break any news here. All they did was link to another article.

Secondly, I think Little is very talented

Third, he should be thanking Paul Tagliabue everyday because if he had pulled that DUI homicide followed by DUI again under Goodell's watch there's no way he'd even be anywhere near a football field

And finally, just because Haslett told someone Little could still be productive is not the same as Redskins are interested in Little.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

NT= Vince Wilfork possible free agent.
LL next to AH could revitilize his love for the game. Richard Seymore would also be a nice option to bring to DC if he hits the market.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=diehardskin2982;663547]NT= Vince Wilfork possible free agent.
LL next to AH could revitilize his love for the game. Richard Seymore would also be a nice option to bring to DC if he hits the market.[/quote]

NT-VW- Pats are gonna re-sign him or franchise tag him. It would be a dream come true for him to come if we did go 3-4 but if we stayed 4-3 imagine him and Albert Haynesworth.


LL-Only depending if its a 4-3 than I would agree,

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[QUOTE=redskins202;663527] Why do people here keep saying we will go to a 3-4?.


QUOTE]

bruce allen said in the redskins address a few weeks ago in response to a question about possibly switching to the 3-4 . . .

he said they were going to run the "skins defense" with a tone that sounded like he had a smile on his face. he also said he wasnt going to give other teams a heads up on what they were planning D scheme wise.

he said more than what i put here, and he left it a bit vague on purpose but reading btw the lines it sure sounded like we are going to be running a hybrid defense if not a more 3-4 heavy hybrid.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=redskins202;663544]Even NT?[/quote]

Sure why not?

His ex-coordinator doesn't seem to think it would be a problem.

[URL="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/albert-haynesworth/theres-been-no-further-indicat.html"]Redskins Insider - Where will Haynesworth fit in Haslett's defense?[/URL]

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=over the mountain;663554][QUOTE=redskins202;663527] Why do people here keep saying we will go to a 3-4?.


QUOTE]

bruce allen said in the redskins address a few weeks ago in response to a question about possibly switching to the 3-4 . . .

he said they were going to run the "skins defense" with a tone that sounded like he had a smile on his face. he also said he wasnt going to give other teams a heads up on what they were planning D scheme wise.

he said more than what i put here, and he left it a bit vague on purpose but reading btw the lines it sure sounded like we are going to be running a hybrid defense if not a [B]more 3-4 heavy hybrid[/B].[/quote]
More than likely it will be sorta kinda 75% 4-3 D, 35% 3-4.


I don't mind Leonardo Little coming here for pass rushing downs. If used right our D will be deadly because at times our pass rush was inconsistant. With a very aggressive DC like Haslett than expect us to blitz and use all sorts of type of things on our DL.


I dont care about Little pass death thing. This isn't a area of friendship or community this is about winning football games. Joey Porter F up Levi Jones but it didn't stop the Dolphins having a very good LB in him.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=redskins202;663568]I dont care about Little pass death thing. This isn't a area of friendship or community this is about winning football games. Joey Porter F up Levi Jones but it didn't stop the Dolphins having a very good LB in him.[/quote]

Not quite the same situation at all.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=redskins202;663568]
[B]More than likely it will be sorta kinda 75% 4-3 D, 35% 3-4.
[/B]
...[/quote]

Glad to see our D will be giving 110% now THAT's Redskins Football

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=SmootSmack;663570]Not quite the same situation at all.[/quote]

Sometimes your gonna have to pick up a guy who will help you win some SB's. Unless Little killed the girl on purpose than I wouldn't want him. But his skills are still useful if healthy.


But its just me....I'm not that preist for us to get this guy.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;663573]Glad to see our D will be giving 110% now THAT's Redskins Football[/quote]

lol oh man

:doh:

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

[quote=Mattyk;663577]lol oh man

:doh:[/quote]

Gotta play 110% football all the time not 100%:) haha.

Re: Leonard Little? Why
 

change of scenary could be good for LL. Or Albert and he will be drinking buddies in the Reston town center LOL