Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   2008 three year-evaluation (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=39635)

SirClintonPortis 11-04-2010 10:54 PM

Re: 2008 three year-evaluation
 
In hindsight, we could have just stayed pat with BPA and have taken Sam Baker. BPA being the player the [B]lowest probability of not busting[/B]

But for all you all who would have said "BUT WE ALREADY HAD CHRIS SAMUELS" fellas who would be shocked at drafting for the future, I think 2009 showed why apparently irrational decisions are actually very rational.

Also, we could have done a better job of ignoring "need", which in this case was "Size at WR" and instead took the "playmaker" least likely to bust REGARDLESS OF SIZE.

Fred Davis was a good decision, IMO.

steveo395 11-05-2010 12:55 AM

Re: 2008 three year-evaluation
 
[quote=SirClintonPortis;756341]In hindsight, we could have just stayed pat with BPA and have taken Sam Baker. BPA being the player the [B]lowest probability of not busting[/B]

But for all you all who would have said "BUT WE ALREADY HAD CHRIS SAMUELS" fellas who would be shocked at drafting for the future, I think 2009 showed why apparently irrational decisions are actually very rational.

Also, we could have done a better job of ignoring "need", which in this case was "Size at WR" and instead took the "playmaker" least likely to bust REGARDLESS OF SIZE.

Fred Davis was a good decision, IMO.[/quote]
Too bad Vinny came out and said that if he stayed at that pick he would have taken Devin Thomas.

skinster 11-05-2010 12:59 AM

Re: 2008 three year-evaluation
 
[quote=SirClintonPortis;756341]In hindsight, we could have just stayed pat with BPA and have taken Sam Baker. BPA being the player the [B]lowest probability of not busting[/B]

But for all you all who would have said "BUT WE ALREADY HAD CHRIS SAMUELS" fellas who would be shocked at drafting for the future, I think 2009 showed why apparently irrational decisions are actually very rational.

Also, we could have done a better job of ignoring "need", which in this case was "Size at WR" and instead took the "playmaker" least likely to bust REGARDLESS OF SIZE.

Fred Davis was a good decision, IMO.[/quote]

what does bpa stand for?

SirClintonPortis 11-05-2010 01:05 AM

Re: 2008 three year-evaluation
 
[quote=steveo395;756346]Too bad Vinny came out and said that if he stayed at that pick he would have taken Devin Thomas.[/quote]

Even more reason to thank God that dumbass is out of here.

SirClintonPortis 11-05-2010 01:05 AM

Re: 2008 three year-evaluation
 
[quote=skinster;756347]what does bpa stand for?[/quote]

Best player available.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.37343 seconds with 9 queries