Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

If you check post #7, Noble was an inadvertent omission.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

i was replying to the guy who posted above me. i didn't look at post #7. either way, oh well.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

I think both Nemo and Rock will make it if for nothing else than ST guys!

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

Manuel White is a fourth-rounder--I very much doubt he doesn't get a shot on the squad.

Also, not sure we take that many O-linemen--maybe Wilson is gone, and we take another WR, TE, or DB. Or maybe McCune gets on for specials?

Can we practice-squad Wilson?

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

[QUOTE=Gmanc711]I agree with Cpayne. Nemo is just a rookie and already looks like the best short yardage back we've had in years. They arent competing to be the backup RB, they are competing to be the short yardage back. I think Nemo has it in the bag already.[/QUOTE]I hate to say but I think Rock will be gone. One thing people forget in 03 he was 9of13 in shortyardage and thats pretty good average. Last year I think he got lost in the mix of things and did not get the chances he earned in 2003.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

does no one else think that 4 CBs is really low? We will have four on the field at one time or another. We'll have alteast 6 CBs.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

[QUOTE=SKINSnCANES]does no one else think that 4 CBs is really low? We will have four on the field at one time or another. We'll have alteast 6 CBs.[/QUOTE]

I agree that 4 is too low a number

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

brandon noble will make the team...

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

I wouldnt be surprised if Warrick Holdman gets cut. You definitly wouldnt expect it but thats my surprise cut. I think he was brought on to move to middle and be a started, but I dotn think hes performed the way many had hoped, and the new guys have out performed expectations.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

holdman is starting quality and i think a key reserve, he's also done MLB he's i think he's too valuable to let go of right now...

we COULD practice squad wilson (after 2 years on an active roster for more than 6-9 games (forget exactly) PS is no longer an option)... the problem with putting wilson on the PS though is that ANY team could take him from us at any time, AND i doubt he'd agree to it since i think the PS pays less than his current rookie contract.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

Man, at the rate injuries occur, it really makes the 53 man roster look too small. I know every team is in the same boat, but I would love to be able to keep more of these guys. I agree with many guys here and would like to keep 6 corners, keep both Nemo AND Rock, and have more depth on the D line. Hard to do all of this with only a 53 man roster.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

I think Noble may get caught in the "numbers game"....although I would love to see him make the team. He's a Redskin for sure. I haven't heard anyone mention
Khary Cambell/LB? What's up with him?

As far as Dyson v. McCants. Dyson has had a better preseason, so I don't know how they make room for McCants at this point.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

i think Holdman will stay, he is a good backup for Lavar. I think Lemar Marshall has pretty much locked up the MLB spot, and i'm not sure about the wr battle.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

I don't see Noble getting cut, that would bump Boschetti up to the #2 DT and even though he's played well this preseason, that would really thin out our depth at that position.

Re: From the 2 games I have seen here are my 52
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I don't see Noble getting cut, that would bump Boschetti up to the #2 DT and even though he's played well this preseason, that would really thin out our depth at that position.[/QUOTE]

salave'a is #2, griffin #1, so boschetti would be #3