![]() |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
Z, Pasta, King, Sally Jenkins... they're all useless. I don't even bother reading their crap anymore.
The only 'outsider' who holds any weight is Clayton. He stays objective for the most part. |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
[QUOTE=CrazyCanuck]Z, Pasta, King, Sally Jenkins... they're all useless. I don't even bother reading their crap anymore.
The only 'outsider' who holds any weight is Clayton. He stays objective for the most part.[/QUOTE] agreed. Clayton is all bookworm and has no inflated 'writer persona' he's feels he needs to maintain. just the facts. |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
[QUOTE=illdefined]agreed. Clayton is all bookworm and has no inflated 'writer persona' he's feels he needs to maintain. just the facts.[/QUOTE]
I wish he didn't reek so much of nerd, but he's definately one of the better analysts, though RJ is pretty good too. |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
Dr. Z's power rankings are meaningless, however I must comment he is a bitch for letting our emails get to him. Any respect I have for this guy (which was very little) just shrunk.
|
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
[QUOTE=CrazyCanuck]Z, Pasta, King, Sally Jenkins... they're all useless. I don't even bother reading their crap anymore.
The only 'outsider' who holds any weight is Clayton. He stays objective for the most part.[/QUOTE] I have to stand up for Mort as well, I like reading and listening to him as much as clayton |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
Fox Sports we have a ten place leap:
[url="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings"]http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings[/url] With the usual reservations. However it's worth reading the # 18 team critique: [i]Good grief, did you see what happened on “Triplets Night” in the Big D? Less than five minutes from a dominating shutout, the ‘Boys lost in stunning fashion and nearly made Jerry Jones come out of his facelift. Instead of watching the bandwagon start filling up after a 2-0 start, Dallas will hear about a “Schottenheimer-esque” conservative second-half offense and the whispers about hard-hitting safety Roy Williams’ ability (or lack thereof) in pass coverage.[/i] [i]:lol: [/i] |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
Can anyone here write better than what I just read?
I have just wasted part of my life reading the most useless garbage I could ever imagine. I won't make that mistake again... for two weeks... |
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
I don't give a flying rat's ass where Dr. Zit ranks us. I just like calling him a dick. Dr. zit is a dick.
|
Re: There here..... DR. Z's power rankings
most of the power rankings that ive seen has us either 16,17 or 18. If we win again, we'll jump up. Our offense might be dismal for a while still but if we win with out defense then you we'll still go up the rankings. The standings are more important anyways. Its easier to rank a team higher with a great offense than defense. Offense is more exciting, we are boring to watch when we have the ball right now but the D is keeping us in the game and we are finally making some highlight real plays with moss' catches, portis' 40 yd run, etc.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.