That would be huge.

Would Samuels want to play at Guard, or would he likely be dissatisfied and look to get traded? (i.e. not sign an extension next year, forcing us to move him for cap reasons)

--Phin

[QUOTE=smootsmack]Did anyone see this quote in Maske's column in today's Wash Post?

"The agent (a veteran NFL agent who has one of the top players in this draft as a client) said the Redskins want to keep left tackle Chris Samuels even if they obtain Gallery, and likely would move Samuels to guard in that scenario. "That would be them jumbo-ing up their line to be like the old 'Hogs,' '' the agent said.

What do we think of that?[/QUOTE]
Funny because that thought actually crossed my mind when the Gallery rumors were flying. That would make for a hell of a line that's for sure!

Thats funny because I thought Samuels was part of the package to move up from the #5 spot. You can't say WR Rod Gardner and LB Trotter would be enough. What then? Next years draft pick or picks?

[QUOTE=Defensewins]Thats funny because I thought Samuels was part of the package to move up from the #5 spot. You can't say WR Rod Gardner and LB Trotter would be enough. What then? Next years draft pick or picks?[/QUOTE]

i think it'd be ramsey. he's pretty much the only player other than samuels with high trade value.

smootsmack:

I suggested the move of Samuels inside back in January. Mark May started as a tackle but really was better as a guard.

Don't get too sappy here about Dockery. He may become a serviceable interior lineman, but at Matty said, this guy is SLOW. He could get rear-ended by a glacier and you can teach a lot of technique things but you can't teach "fast" or "quick".

we would have a one of the beat lines but it's not got to happen.we are going to draft the man sean taylor

[QUOTE=sportscurmudgeon]smootsmack:

I suggested the move of Samuels inside back in January. Mark May started as a tackle but really was better as a guard.

Don't get too sappy here about Dockery. He may become a serviceable interior lineman, but at Matty said, this guy is SLOW. He could get rear-ended by a glacier and you can teach a lot of technique things but you can't teach "fast" or "quick".[/QUOTE]
While you can't teach fast or quick, he could benefit from dropping some weight, toning up and going through the rigors of a Gibbs led training camp!

I wouldnt want to do that. We have Bugel, if we only have one spot on our line that isnt solid and bugel should be able to take care of that. Plus all of our schemes will be better. I would be upset if we got Gallery. Everyone arugues about Winslow or Taylor but no one would be mad if we picked either one of htem. Our team is an impact player away from stepping up to the next level and Gallery would give our team anything. Portis would be better but he'll do well anyways.