Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]6-6 isn't progress...if we cut down on mistakes and turnovers then I would be inclined to agree with you.[/QUOTE]

We obviously have not been watching the same team for this to be the case. Even without any of the supporting statistics, the bottom line is that this team has improved by leaps & bounds. While it may not be a complete 180, I will certainly take it over the dismal 2004 performance any day.

Re: So, how are we doing? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=Ramseyfan]Hey no fair, you're using facts to back up what you are saying.[/QUOTE]

Haha yeah...we don't take kindly to no fact-users on this here board!

Re: So, how are we doing? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=amorentz]Haha yeah...we don't take kindly to no fact-users on this here board![/QUOTE]

Just tell me how the Redskins make you feel........

(Please, no replys from Sally Jenkins...)

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

From a Stats perspective, I think we will end up better defensively by the end of the year. I don't see any of our remaining games being very high scoring, no matter wheither we win or lose. I hope Gibbs continues the "Rushing" attack we saw against the Rams. Especially against the Cardinals this week. That kind of a game plan really speeds up the game because it eats clock and reduces plays. If the result of the drives equal TDs then it becomes demoralizing for the other team. The skins had a couple of really time consuming drives against the Rams because they ran so much.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

Oh come on guys, we have won two close games we didn't last year. It's luck of the draw, but look at how many turnovers we had all of last year (27) and thus far this year (21) and the progress you see dissipates.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]Oh come on guys, we have won two close games we didn't last year. It's luck of the draw, but look at how many turnovers we had all of last year (27) and thus far this year (21) and the progress you see dissipates.[/QUOTE]

You realize that means we are on pace for just 28 turnovers this year, right? That's not really a compelling argument.

I don't understand your point about winning two more games this year not meaning anything.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

it's definitely progress. unfortunately these thing take time don't they? it's not like we're even out of it yet!!! and if we barely miss the playoffs, we'll definitely be in next year.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]Oh come on guys, we have won two close games we didn't last year. It's luck of the draw, but look at how many turnovers we had all of last year (27) and thus far this year (21) and the progress you see dissipates.[/QUOTE]

I wasn't aware progress was simply measured by the number of turnovers. I agree that turnovers and mistakes are still very much an area for further improvement, but I just don't see how that can justify saying no progress has been made from last year to this year.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

My point is this team is still making the same mistakes as last year and as such they haven't truly progressed. I guess we differ in that I would call 8-4 progress (achievable if it weren't for critical turnovers) where as 6-6 is just a romance comedy with some tragedy here and there.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]My point is this team is still making the same mistakes as last year and as such they haven't truly progressed. I guess we differ in that I would call 8-4 progress (achievable if it weren't for critical turnovers) where as 6-6 is just a romance comedy with some tragedy here and there.[/QUOTE]
What a load! Are you honestly telling me that you think this team isn't any better than last year? Do you actually watch the games?

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]My point is this team is still making the same mistakes as last year and as such they haven't truly progressed. I guess we differ in that I would call 8-4 progress (achievable if it weren't for critical turnovers) where as 6-6 is just a romance comedy with some tragedy here and there.[/QUOTE]



Just my opinion, last year, we were lucky win what we did. This year, our opponents are lucky. Next year, they won't be! It's how you build a team

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]My point is this team is still making the same mistakes as last year and as such they haven't truly progressed. I guess we differ in that I would call 8-4 progress (achievable if it weren't for critical turnovers) where as 6-6 is just a romance comedy with some tragedy here and there.[/QUOTE]

6-6 is progress....8-4 is a complete turn around.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

They are moving the ball alright but would you call 2 more points per game better? Give me a break. This team isn't really that different from last year. Sure the ball gets moved quite a bit but when you turn it over it's all for null.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

Here is how our team is different: WE HAVE SANTANA MOSS. That is the difference, and it's a big one. Jon Jansen instead of Ray Brown I'd say is an upgrade as well.

Re: So, how are we doing compared to last year? Here is what the numbers say...
 

[QUOTE=saden1]They are moving the ball alright but would you call 2 more points per game better? Give me a break. This team isn't really that different from last year. Sure the ball gets moved quite a bit but when you turn it over it's all for null.[/QUOTE]

Its alot different!! The Off is better the D is worse. Were playing a harder schedule and were 6-6.... Look at the numbers from the earlier posts.