Re: In retrospect...
 

Prioleau was a pretty solid player for us, not sure where he warrants any great dislike from us.

And yes, he's a pretty safe bet to make the team this year.

Re: In retrospect...
 

This is easy.....by far Taylor Jacobs. Dude was supposed to be a 1st round pick and hasn't done shit but get hurt and play soft.

Re: In retrospect...
 

yeah he's a douche bag!

Re: In retrospect...
 

if anyone remembers the seattle game,im not sure cory raymer belonged in the nfl,at least not with the skins.he was god awful and thats really the only game i remember him playing in

Re: In retrospect...
 

Jacobs, honorable mention to Holdman.

Re: In retrospect...
 

Holdman and raymer. I hope i never have to see such a subpar performance coming from a center playing guard again.

Re: In retrospect...
 

[quote=EXoffender]At least Stoutmire was a wanted man in the offseason (NO). Will Prioleau make the team this year?[/quote]

he's a lock cause he's still under contract. Unlike stoutmire, he wasn't an FA. He's our #3 S and the only legit backup we have to Taylor and Archuleta right now.

Pearson is one of our best reserve players.

my list:
raymer, jacobs, nic clemons, holdman, farris, novak (blocked kick after blocked kick), frost (terrible), and brown (yeah we needed his TD, but that was one good play among a million bad ones... its possible we could have made up that win if we din't have his fumbles and odd FCs).

Re: In retrospect...
 

[quote=dmek25]if anyone remembers the seattle game,im not sure cory raymer belonged in the nfl,at least not with the skins.he was god awful and thats really the only game i remember him playing in[/quote]

he play a full year at C when gibbs got here, and got pushed back every single play :( he's just really bad.

Re: In retrospect...
 

Gotta go with Jacobs or Holdman. JAcobs was a waste of a roster spot for someone with pretty good athletic ability but absolutely no durability and Holdman was taking the spot of one of the best playmakers @ the lb position in quite a few years. sure lavar had lost a step but there is no way holdman should have had the starting job for as much as he did with the complete lack of production on his part. 23 tackles in 14 games is just pathetic.

Re: In retrospect...
 

Jacobs, followed by Raymer. Ugh. We fixed the WR problem in FA, but I'm still worried about O line depth. Raymer was WEAK!

Re: In retrospect...
 

Jacobs and Raymer. There was nobody on D who did absolutely nothing.

Jacobs has had too long to learn and picked nothing up. Raymer has been around too long to forget what he's learnt. Almost a mirror of each other.

How is it in the modern NFL we couldn't find an above average WR or OL to replace them last year?

Re: In retrospect...
 

Not even close. It's Taylor Jacobs.

That's it ... that's the list.

He plays with all the intensity of a flaccid penis.

Re: In retrospect...
 

raymer and jacobs

Re: In retrospect...
 

[QUOTE=JoeRedskin]Yup. Bet money on it. As others have commented, he is solid in defense and on special teams. Maybe he isn't a super star but he is a reliable part time starter (for us) and better than average back up. I felt he was one of our better "under the radar" free agents. He was a starter for some good buffalo defenses and was one of those "1 1/2" Players - (Players who will start for some teams, but are best utilized as a "first of the bench" reserve).

If we cut him, somebody picks him up quickly.

BTW - This year's Prileou will be the CB we got from Jacksonville.[/QUOTE]

no, wright is taking place of walt harris. this years prioleau is archuleta

Re: In retrospect...
 

[quote=Beemnseven]Not even close. It's Taylor Jacobs.

That's it ... that's the list.

He plays with all the intensity of a flaccid penis.[/quote]that should be his new nickname. Flaccid Taylor Jacobs :lol:

Re: In retrospect...
 

[FONT=Century Gothic][SIZE=7][B]TAYLOR JACOBS!!!![/B][SIZE=2]...mentioning anyone else but him is an exercise of futility.[/SIZE][/SIZE][/FONT]