![]() |
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
[quote=PWNED][IMG]http://minipearls.homestead.com/files/lumberjack.JPG[/IMG]
if this guy was high, would it make him a hijack?[/quote] That looks like me during my senior year of college. Back on track, what is the contract situation of all of our linemen? Are they all pretty secured for at least the next couple of years? |
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Contract expirations:
Jansen - 2008 Thomas - 2009 Rabach - 2010 Dockery - 2006 Samuels - 2011 |
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
[quote=TheInspector]I think that guy is high ;) It looks like he is ready to take a piss...and what is that on his head?[/quote]
I dunno man... but its... so fuzzzy......adsfxcvxxxxxxxaaffffffdkemn1!! |
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
i think this is one of the cases of a redskins thread going off topic. We all promised to try and not do this so I am doing my part.
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
[quote=gibbsisgod]I, for one, would still say that thomas is better.
if you had to choose betwen the 2 you cant tell me you would take dock over thomas, can you? in docks defense i should say that i have noticed a huge improvement over the last season compared to early on. he was always good for 2 penaties a game whether it be false start or holding.but you dont hear his name called that often and that is usually a good thing.[/quote] Well Dock is younger and a lot cheaper and we haven't seen Thomas on the fixed ankle yet. Dock was an All-American at Texas, he still has upside. That being said, Thomas was awesome last year before he was hurt. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.