Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;224408]I agree that we have to keep the focus on the running game to open everything up. But, I feel like their defense may be forced to focus on Moss the most because they know what he can do, he did put up 3 TDs in one game on them last year. That being said, ARE and Lloyd may be left more open than in the past so they could end up having huge days.
I'm very interested to see how Saunders approaches this one.[/quote]

I gotta say that all the pre-season gitty anticipation may finally have arrived. Remember when teams focused on Moss and shut down our offense... that is no longer an option. Everyone is daring NYG to key on moss. They will be exploited worse than congressional pedophiles.

I anticipate a heavy blitz scheme on Sunday...

I think the blitzes will come much more frequent and intense then we have seen them thus far. The only time our offense hasn't clicked is when old bones Brunell is running for his life.

Just hoping O-Line answers to the call the same way as they did last week. I predict a huge win, but a tight game in the first half while the o-line adjusts to the blitz packages, and Lavar is out by the first Quarter with a strained left labia.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;224527]Tiki is a different animal that Fred "I'm almost as fragile as Taylor Jacobs" Taylor.[/quote]

Tiki can run that ball ... and he'll be ready on Sunday, I'm sure.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

HAHAHA. Nice one about the labia.

I don't doubt we'll score points. My doubts are whether we can stop them in a shootout.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;224527]Tiki is a different animal that Fred "I'm almost as fragile as Taylor Jacobs" Taylor.[/quote]

He's human....we can stop him.

He [I][B][U]is[/U][/B][/I] human, right?

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=RedskinRat;224468]On a side issue, does ANYONE here find Carrot Top amusing?[/quote]
i would answer this but dont want to be sbf'ed( if you know what i mean)

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=RedskinRat;224535]He's human....we can stop him.

He [I][B][U]is[/U][/B][/I] human, right?[/quote]

not sure man... i hear you can see his teeth from outer space.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=dmek25;224542]i would answer this but dont want to be sbf'ed( if you know what i mean)[/quote]

GRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

The Giants D right now is in a state of flux but I wouldn't go out and bet the farm just yet .Their running D is very good the Pass D sucks .Right now in a shootout I'll take the Giants ,Manning is a better QB than Brunell is right now.:)

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224562]The Giants D right now is in a state of flux but I wouldn't go out and bet the farm just yet .Their running D is very good the Pass D sucks .Right now in a shootout I'll take the Giants ,Manning is a better QB than Brunell is right now.:)[/quote]

But Manning doesn't have Moss, Lloyd and Randal El.. OR Cooley... sorry dude....

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224562]The Giants D right now is in a state of flux but I wouldn't go out and bet the farm just yet .Their running D is very good the Pass D sucks .Right now in a shootout I'll take the Giants ,Manning is a better QB than Brunell is right now.:)[/quote]

and plax and shockey combined for what? 30 yards and 400 dropped passes last game? you still have soft DTs and probably a rookie starting OLB (oh yeah, and lavar :P). that defense has plenty of holes.

an yeah i know, your #3 WR will probably have a field day, they always do.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=hesscl34;224565]But Manning doesn't have Moss, Lloyd and Randal El.. OR Cooley... sorry dude....[/quote]

Burrass, Toomer , Carter, Shocky,and Tiki goes out wide if you need him add in Brandon Jacobs,nope.:spank:

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

Depends who you ask:

[url=http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFC/PYDS/2006/regular]NFL.com - NFL Stats[/url]

Brunell ranked 7th, Manning E. ranked 11th.

What else you got?

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224562]The Giants D right now is in a state of flux but I wouldn't go out and bet the farm just yet .Their running D is very good the Pass D sucks .Right now in a shootout I'll take the Giants ,Manning is a better QB than Brunell is right now.:)[/quote]

Brunell- 77/118 (65.3%) 950 YDS 4TD 2INT

Manning - 75/113 (66.4%) 893 YDS 8TD 5INT

I'd say it's pretty close.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224568]Burrass, Toomer , Carter, Shocky,and Tiki goes out wide if you need him add in Brandon Jacobs,nope.:spank:[/quote]

Oh, let us not forget Porits and Sellers.... OH AND Patten.... there are so many I lose track.... :)

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

heres a match-up

[url=http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/was/]Washington Redskins News, Scores, Schedule, Stats - Yahoo! Sports[/url]

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=RobH4413;224569]Brunell- 77/118 (65.3%) 950 YDS 4TD 2INT

Manning - 75/113 (66.4%) 893 YDS 8TD 5INT

I'd say it's pretty close.[/quote]


2 of the int's were off the recievers .Brunell can't take the hits.Lets not forget what team has played who ?

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

statistics don't mean much in first 4 games....

giants have only played 3...

not really an argument if you ask me...

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

But you can't ignore the fact that you're the Giants....:laughing2

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=hesscl34;224574]Oh, let us not forget Porits and Sellers.... OH AND Patten.... there are so many I lose track.... :)[/quote]


Not even close ,Sellers ..Peter Sellers right?:)

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

We use Sellers as a TE.....

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224581]Not even close ,Sellers ..Peter Sellers right?:)[/quote]

You're going to wish he was on Sunday, cos you won't be laughing at the way he smashed your D around.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224577]2 of the int's were off the recievers .Brunell can't take the hits.Lets not forget what team has played who ?[/quote]

you lost to the colts and tried very hard to lose the the eagles (who flat out out-choked you), an then got routed by the seahawks (who, by the way, have never beaten the skins in the regular season, as in, EVER).

we're coming off two near 500 yard games, and pushing the jag around.

it'll be a shoot out, and brunell didn't get touched last game, so it doesn't really matter if he can take hits unless you get to him. jansen owns strahan.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=hesscl34;224583]We use Sellers as a TE.....[/quote]

if by TE you mean FB.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=That Guy;224586]if by TE you mean FB.[/quote]

same differnece... haha..... Looks the same on TV anyway... :)

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=That Guy;224585]you lost to the colts and tried very hard to lose the the eagles (who flat out out-choked you), an then got routed by the seahawks (who, by the way, have never beaten the skins in the regular season, as in, EVER).

we're coming off two near 500 yard games, and pushing the jag around.

it'll be a shoot out, and brunell didn't get touched last game, so it doesn't really matter if he can take hits unless you get to him. jansen owns strahan.[/quote]

You better check your stats from the first game last year.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

In that case so do Jimmy Choo's and Manolo Blahnik's....<ZING>

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224591]You better check your stats from the first game last year.[/quote]

It's about 'Now' not 'Then'. We're so much better a team, you'll hardly recognize us.

Well, you [B][I]really[/I][/B] won't recognize us through your hands over your eyes.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224577]2 of the int's were off the recievers .Brunell can't take the hits.Lets not forget what team has played who ?[/quote]

Brunell can't take hits? ... WRONG. He proved he can take plenty in the first two games!!!!! AND then come back and kick ass!

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=RedskinRat;224593]It's about 'Now' not 'Then'. We're so much better a team, you'll hardly recognize us.

Well, you [B][I]really[/I][/B] won't recognize us through your hands over your eyes.[/quote]


Really ,then how can Janson "own" Strahan when they haven't played NOW!:spank:

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224602]Really ,then how can Janson "own" Strahan when they haven't played NOW!:spank:[/quote]

Not my statement so I have no need to defend it.

I'd rather make a blind faith statement. Much more fun.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

... because strahan is gay :doh:

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=GhettoDogAllStars;224609]... because strahan is gay :doh:[/quote]

Well, actually he's [B][I][U]not[/U][/I][/B] but his boyfriend is.......

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224591]You better check your stats from the first game last year.[/quote]

you REALLY need to check the stats from the second game last year.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

Have we reached the acceptable threshold to begin highjack?

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224602]Really ,then how can Janson "own" Strahan when they haven't played NOW!:spank:[/quote]

:spank::smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:spank:


:doh:

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

yeah, RedskinRat was right: we need a tumbleweed emoticon ...

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=That Guy;224616]you REALLY need to check the stats from the second game last year.[/quote]

you really need to read the post .

RedskinRatQuote:
Originally Posted by [B]Giantone[/B] [URL="http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/14798-i-know-pointless-but-post224591.html#post224591"][IMG]http://www.thewarpath.net/images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/IMG][/URL]
[I]You better check your stats from the first game last year.[/I]



It's about 'Now' not 'Then'. We're so much better a team, you'll hardly recognize us.

Well, you [B][I]really[/I][/B] won't recognize us through your hands over your eyes.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224666]you really need to read the post .

RedskinRatQuote:
Originally Posted by [B]Giantone[/B] [URL="http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/14798-i-know-pointless-but-post224591.html#post224591"][IMG]http://www.thewarpath.net/images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/IMG][/URL]
[I]You better check your stats from the first game last year.[/I]



It's about 'Now' not 'Then'. We're so much better a team, you'll hardly recognize us.

Well, you [B][I]really[/I][/B] won't recognize us through your hands over your eyes.[/quote]

:smashfrea

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

:spank: this is whats happening on sunday to the giants:censored: and this is what shockeys going to call the coach:hitfan: and this is the new york paper on monday

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=dmek25;224678]:spank: this is whats happening on sunday to the giants:censored: and this is what shockeys going to call the coach:hitfan: and this is the new york paper on monday[/quote]

There you go, you have to speak Giantone's language otherwise he will not understand you.