Re: 2007 Worst to First?
 

I went with the lions because I think that the NFC North will be such a crappy division this year that anyone could take it. That said, I really hope/think we'll sweep them this season..

Re: 2007 Worst to First?
 

[QUOTE=ArtMonkDrillz;330511]I went with the lions because I think that the NFC North will be such a crappy division this year that anyone could take it. That said, I really hope/think we'll sweep them this season..[/QUOTE]

Yes... that is a good call... But I have thought that for a few years and they just keep suckin...

I do think we should be able to beat the entire division as well. I don't think Chicago is that great (good - yes, but not great) other than their Defense.... I guess we shall see.

Re: 2007 Worst to First?
 

i vote none of the above!

Re: 2007 Worst to First?
 

Detroit. Just ask them.

Re: 2007 Worst to First?
 

I picked Cleveland, cause they have talent. However, I do not think that...I would have chose none of the above.
I do think Detroit has a better shot than Arizona for the simple fact that the NFC Central is weak, and the bears could easily take a huge dive. An 8-8 team could win that division.