Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=19422)

SmootSmack 08-24-2007 02:28 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
In fairness, they did also say that they (Golic at least) have seen Jason Campbell every year since his college years and he has matured and improved each year. And they like what they see out of him, but that they don't know that he has enough experience yet to lead this team to a lot of wins. They praised the running game. They had strong positive words about Gibbs, saying he had nothing to prove to anyone, that he'd proven more than enough the first time around. They love the Landry pick.

Overall though, they believe with a young QB, a suspect line, and no true cohesion from year to year the Skins will struggle.

irish 08-24-2007 06:32 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
I think 8-8 would be a great season for the skins. They have a rookie QB (who has a sore knee now) and an O that cant score points. The D has played good but its preseason so you cant make too much out of that. I think the other predictions are on the low side.

chrisl4064 08-24-2007 06:37 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
lets be honest here, what did you expect them to say after last year....

i personally have my own doubts about this year for us and im not hyping anything up. i do think that mike and mike are a bunch of jackasses who talk out of thier ass, but i dont know of any sportswriters that have us predicted to go to the playoffs either.

He Hate Me 08-24-2007 08:32 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
[FONT=Georgia][COLOR=black][B]Golic is just a Philly homer! He doesn't want to give any other team in the division credit except for the Eagles. He's too scared that he wouldn't be able to stuff his fat face safely in Philly with a cheesesteak if he said anything positive about the Skins.[/B][/COLOR][/FONT]

Monkeydad 08-24-2007 08:56 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
I heard this segment and the whole time Golic was talking, I kept saying "you must not have seen our D!" He said he's looking forward to seeing Landry and Taylor kill people, but didn't even mention all of the injuries our D had last year when bashing them and never even said the name London Fletcher.

He's not paying attention. I don't mind, we'll surprise a lot of people this year.

redskinsfanatic 08-25-2007 11:04 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
they both need a couple of enemas,and to stick with calling arena bowl games since that is about the level of football they are on!WTF did mike golic ever do as a player?he needs to stick to nutrisystem.like i said before one's a blimp,the other a wimp.i'd put the skins at 10-6 because of gibbs.

skinsguy 08-25-2007 11:21 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
I don't care what Mike & Mike, Simon and Simon or Arm and Hammer will say about the Redskins. If we're to be the underdogs, so what?

Cowell 08-25-2007 11:29 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
IMO I like being an underdog. Second Mike & Mike don't know what they are talking about, they should watch a game tape of us THIS year.

skinsnut 08-25-2007 01:28 PM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
I'm not as confident as the rest when it comes to our defense.
The truth is we stopped a backup QB with the Titans and we slowed Pittsburgh...it seems we wore down and gave up long drives over a period of time. Yes, no touchdowns, but long drives eventually wear defenses down.
I dont see the Ravens as a particularly strong offensive team to measure against either...I am concerned.

I am Very concerned about our offensive line.
To expect strong showings from Betts and Portis this year is a stretch...especially before the bye...the OL has not played well together...period.

I think Campbell will be good but I am still waiting for good performances by ARE or Lloyd.

The only significant differences in this years team and last is this:
Campbell starting.
A missing LG (at least until they jell)
A much better MLB

Thats probably good enough for an additional 3 wins, tops.
I would be shocked if the skins went 9-7

Last year, I thought the team would go 6-10 at this time..I was wrong...but, take a good look at first team performance....struggling to score and giving up long drives against a decent offense....hmm.

I sure hope I am wrong

calia 08-25-2007 03:30 PM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
I think all of the folks who are expressing skepticism based on last year haven't looked very hard at last year's W-L record -- by this I mean that a very large number of losses were by a handful of points. In other words, even with a terrible D last year (and it was), we still managed to make games close even when we lost. A few plays in the other direction (e.g., a few turnovers going our way), and last year's record would have potentially been quite different.

Bottom line: last year was last year, and even last year could be the springboard for something better.

Cowell 08-25-2007 03:33 PM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
Tonight will be a good test of our run defense IMO.

skinsnut 08-25-2007 10:48 PM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
[QUOTE=skinsnut;343789]I'm not as confident as the rest when it comes to our defense.
The truth is we stopped a backup QB with the Titans and we slowed Pittsburgh...it seems we wore down and gave up long drives over a period of time. Yes, no touchdowns, but long drives eventually wear defenses down.
I dont see the Ravens as a particularly strong offensive team to measure against either...I am concerned.

I am Very concerned about our offensive line.
To expect strong showings from Betts and Portis this year is a stretch...especially before the bye...the OL has not played well together...period.

I think Campbell will be good but I am still waiting for good performances by ARE or Lloyd.

The only significant differences in this years team and last is this:
Campbell starting.
A missing LG (at least until they jell)
A much better MLB

Thats probably good enough for an additional 3 wins, tops.
I would be shocked if the skins went 9-7

Last year, I thought the team would go 6-10 at this time..I was wrong...but, take a good look at first team performance....struggling to score and giving up long drives against a decent offense....hmm.

I sure hope I am wrong[/QUOTE]

(halftime)
Its very interesting that the same thing is happening to our D that happened against the Steelers....fantastic early, then giving up long drives as the half wore on...I wonder how they would wear down over an entire game...This is the thing that makes me think our defense is not as good as everyone thinks right now.

ncskinsfanec 08-25-2007 11:31 PM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
Mike and Mike are a prime example of morons in the media. I take very very little stock in their opinions.

Skins_4_Lyfe 08-26-2007 12:47 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
They just could be right if the offense doesn't get any better. Is it just me or has our defense outscored our offense so far in the pre season. This is unexeptable considering we have the most expensive offense in football, from the overrated playcallers to the overatted players. We look terrible (again) and I'm almost certain it will leak over into the season. The offense doesn't look any better than it did in our first pre season game last year. I don't even have to do research on this but I already know that our starting offense is ranked # 32.

724Skinsfan 08-26-2007 07:36 AM

Re: Mike & Mike: low expectations for the Skins
 
The starting defense hasn't outscored the starting offense. Plus, the offense has been missing some fairly important players.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.56764 seconds with 9 queries