![]() |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;703682]The Rs are just doing their job positioning for Nov. 2010. The Ds will argue back and the fun continues......meanwhile the debt clock keeps spinning, our kids/family members/friends are still sitting targets in Iraq/Afghanistan, and oil keeps floating around the Gulf destroying livelihoods and the ecosystem.[/quote]
All they Rs are doing is destroying his brand and maybe (very maybe) they can pick the seat up. Nothing legal will come of it but ultimately BO was elected on the promise that he was different and didn't buy into all this insider DC BS. So soaking him in the aura of dirty politics is simply an exercise in killing this widespread(but shrinking) belief that BO is anything other than the same old same old. Be sure that this is about maintaining the position for Nov '10 but also building a case against BO in '12. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;703676]+1 credibility point for you.[/quote]
Seriously, I mean did he steal Glenn Beck or is that Hannity's favorite line? |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
I love it. Obama today durn his press conf. today was asked a question about this. He gave a long answer about how they will answer that question in a few days and that there was nothing wrong with what was done. Ok, the only reason you have to take days before answering a question is that you have to think of a lie so not to get into trouble. Who needs days when telling the truth. This guy is nothing but a lier and this is his transparent goverment.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=firstdown;703728]I love it. Obama today durn his press conf. today was asked a question about this. He gave a long answer about how they will answer that question in a few days and that there was nothing wrong with what was done. Ok, the only reason you have to take days before answering a question is that you have to think of a lie so not to get into trouble. Who needs days when telling the truth. This guy is nothing but a lier and this is his transparent goverment.[/quote]
oh, a politician dodging a question so they can calculate their answer/message!! what a shocking development! i voted for and like and support President Obama, but even in 2008 i knew he was still just a politician. i'm sure there's a part of him that would like to "change the way they do things in washington" and parts of him that know that's impossible but it's still a good campaign slogan. but this idea of "this guy is nother but a liar" is a bit over the top. he's a politician so by definition he is not always truthful. and learn how to fucking spell already. stuff like "lier" makes you and your arguments look like a fuckin moron. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
How about he wants all the facts about what happened before he gives an off the cuff answer at a press conference about an oil spill.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=Rainy Parade;703731]oh, a politician dodging a question so they can calculate their answer/message!! what a shocking development!
i voted for and like and support President Obama, but even in 2008 i knew he was still just a politician. i'm sure there's a part of him that would like to "change the way they do things in washington" and parts of him that know that's impossible but it's still a good campaign slogan. but this idea of "this guy is nother but a liar" is a bit over the top. he's a politician so by definition he is not always truthful. [B]and learn how to fucking spell already. stuff like "lier" makes you and your arguments look like a fuckin moron[/B].[/quote] Well, for firstdown, that just nothing but truth in advertising at work! j/k - nothing but love. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=Rainy Parade;703731]oh, a politician dodging a question so they can calculate their answer/message!! what a shocking development!
i voted for and like and support President Obama, but even in 2008 i knew he was still just a politician. i'm sure there's a part of him that would like to "change the way they do things in washington" and parts of him that know that's impossible but it's still a good campaign slogan. but this idea of "this guy is nother but a liar" is a bit over the top. he's a politician so by definition he is not always truthful. and learn how to fucking spell already. stuff like "lier" makes you and your arguments look like a fuckin moron.[/quote] From a fucking moron to a fucking dick head. FO |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Ok, then. Let's put an end to this before it gets too out of hand here.
Rainy, firstdown simply can't (or maybe won't) spell correctly. It's just something you have to accept. There's no way around it really. He's terrible at it, and he'll never improve. It's just the way it is. Remarkably, he's relatively easy to understand |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=SmootSmack;703755]Ok, then. Let's put an end to this before it gets too out of hand here.
Rainy, firstdown simply can't (or maybe won't) spell correctly. It's just something you have to accept. There's no way around it really. He's terrible at it, and he'll never improve. It's just the way it is. Remarkably, he's relatively easy to understand[/quote] LOL, is that just a nice way to call me an FM. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
What's an FM? Frantic Moron I assume.
No, not at all. You can't spell worth a damn. And I've told you many times I think you're the worst I've ever seen. But I don't think you're a moron |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=SmootSmack;703755]Ok, then. Let's put an end to this before it gets too out of hand here.
Rainy, firstdown simply can't (or maybe won't) spell correctly. It's just something you have to accept. There's no way around it really. He's terrible at it, and he'll never improve. It's just the way it is. [B]Remarkably, he's relatively easy to understand[/quote][/B] hahahaha |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=SmootSmack;703758]What's an FM? Frantic Moron I assume.
No, not at all. You can't spell worth a damn. And I've told you many times I think you're the worst I've ever seen. But I don't think you're a moron[/quote] I know and I have admitted many times I can not spell. I don't mind a joke or two but it ticks me when someone who does not even know me calls me a Fn Moron. I don't call people names and I expect the same from others. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Benjamin Franklin was a poor speller as well.
AND I imagine he would look with disdain on those who called him an Fn moron...... |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Ben Franklin didn't have the privilege of living in the spell check era.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=Mattyk;703883]Ben Franklin didn't have the privilege of living in the spell check era.[/quote]
What's speell chek? |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Exactly.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Exactly.....
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Exatlee.............
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Every once in a while this site makes me laugh hard enough to draw attention to myself at work. These last few posts re: Firstdown have done the job today.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Official White House Counsel memo:
[URL]http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Sestak_Memorandum.pdf[/URL] |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=SmootSmack;703758][B]What's an FM[/B]? Frantic Moron I assume.
No, not at all. You can't spell worth a damn. And I've told you many times I think you're the worst I've ever seen. But I don't think you're a moron[/quote] I was thinking Fish Monger |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=FRPLG;703707]All they Rs are doing is destroying his brand and maybe (very maybe) they can pick the seat up. Nothing legal will come of it but ultimately BO was elected on the promise that he was different and didn't buy into all this insider DC BS. So soaking him in the aura of dirty politics is simply an exercise in killing this widespread(but shrinking) belief that BO is anything other than the same old same old. Be sure that this is about maintaining the position for Nov '10 but also building a case against BO in '12.[/quote]
You nailed it. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
Pretty murky...
[url=http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0610/secretive_on_sestak_435a43c7-f633-414e-adf7-b50533599c78.html]Gibbs: 'I'd refer you to the memo' | POLITICO 44[/url] |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
GM, I'm curious. Do you think a crime was committed? I'm only asking because of the title of the thread.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=12thMan;704303]GM, I'm curious. Do you think a crime was committed? I'm only asking because of the title of the thread.[/quote]
The articles I've read point to a violation of 18 USC 211 as a felony. I don't doubt for one second the Chicago-style politics sitting in 1600 PA Ave offered such a thing to Sestak. So, yeah. I guess I do think a crime was committed. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=GMScud;704304]The articles I've read point to a violation of 18 USC 211 as a felony. I don't doubt for one second the Chicago-style politics sitting in 1600 PA Ave offered such a thing to Sestak. So, yeah. I guess I do think a crime was committed.[/quote]
I'm not sure what Chicago style politics mean, but IF a crime was committed ---and I've heard Rep. Darrell (R) Issa throw this same violation around-- I would have to think that at least a specific offer for a paid position had to be offered. At issue, is whether the White House broke federal law that prohibits exerting the promise of influence for obtaining a federal job, interfering in elections of promising employment for political activity. (I pulled this from a source) Sestak was offered a non-compensated position, not a federal paying job. He had a thirty second conversation with Bill Clinton about a position on a "presidential board". Nothing specific was offered or declined, per Sestak. This is a bunch of political hay that's going nowhere except for the Sunday talk shows. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
By the way, Darrell Issa is the only one publicly pushing for an investigation.
|
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=12thMan;704307][B]I'm not sure what Chicago style politics mean[/B], but IF a crime was committed ---and I've heard Rep. Darrell (R) Issa throw this same violation around-- I would have to think that at least a specific offer for a paid position had to be offered.
At issue, is whether the White House broke federal law that prohibits exerting the promise of influence for obtaining a federal job, interfering in elections of promising employment for political activity. (I pulled this from a source) Sestak was offered a non-compensated position, not a federal paying job. He had a thirty second conversation with Bill Clinton about a position on a "presidential board". Nothing specific was offered or declined, per Sestak. This is a bunch of political hay that's going nowhere except for the Sunday talk shows.[/quote] I too am curios what that means...Is it anything like [URL="http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=19811126&id=ibcsAAAAIBAJ&sjid=HhQEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5060,5317656"]Tampico[/URL] style politics? |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=12thMan;704307][B]I'm not sure what Chicago style politics mean, but IF a crime was committed[/B] ---and I've heard Rep. Darrell (R) Issa throw this same violation around-- I would have to think that at least a specific offer for a paid position had to be offered.
At issue, is whether the White House broke federal law that prohibits exerting the promise of influence for obtaining a federal job, interfering in elections of promising employment for political activity. (I pulled this from a source) Sestak was offered a non-compensated position, not a federal paying job. He had a thirty second conversation with Bill Clinton about a position on a "presidential board". Nothing specific was offered or declined, per Sestak. This is a bunch of political hay that's going nowhere except for the Sunday talk shows.[/quote] I guess you could also call it arm-twisting politics... |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=12thMan;704307]I'm not sure what Chicago style politics mean, but IF a crime was committed ---and I've heard Rep. Darrell (R) Issa throw this same violation around-- I would have to think that at least a specific offer for a paid position had to be offered.
At issue, is whether the White House broke federal law that prohibits exerting the promise of influence for obtaining a federal job, interfering in elections of promising employment for political activity. (I pulled this from a source) Sestak was offered a non-compensated position, not a federal paying job. He had a thirty second conversation with Bill Clinton about a position on a "presidential board". Nothing specific was offered or declined, per Sestak. [B]This is a bunch of political hay that's going nowhere except for the Sunday talk shows[/B].[/quote] I wouldn't go that far. Gibbs is getting peppered with questions about it daily. Most likely it's not as serious as some are saying, but I don't think it's the "nothing to see here, move along" afterthought that the White House claims it to be. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
And, initially, Watergate was just a two-bit burglary gone wrong and Monica Lewinsky was just some woman referred to by a disgruntled former Clinton employee.
Not saying this is the next Watergate or Lewinsky, just saying almost every major political scandal starts small. Of course, a [I]lot[/I] of little scandals happen all the time. You never know which one is going to end up having legs [insert crass Monica reference here]. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=GMScud;704310]I guess you could also call it arm-twisting politics...[/quote]
My new boss the other day enticed me to stay on with my company by offering me a promotion. I asked him if it come with a pay raise and he replied "Probably. I'll have to check and see if your current pay overlaps the new pay-grade." Is what he is doing a form of arm twisting? Unethical? |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=saden1;704313]My new boss the other day enticed me to stay on with my company by offering me a promotion. I asked him if it come with a pay raise and he replied "Probably. I'll have to check and see if your current pay overlaps the new pay-grade." Is what he is doing a form of arm twisting? Unethical?[/quote]
:doh: I see you still have not made it to post #2. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=saden1;704313]My new boss the other day enticed me to stay on with my company by offering me a promotion. I asked him if it come with a pay raise and he replied "Probably. I'll have to check and see if your current pay overlaps the new pay-grade." Is what he is doing a form of arm twisting? Unethical?[/quote]
Come on Saden thats not even a very good example. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=joethiesmanfan;703679]I hope the tea party wins and cut taxes some more.[/quote]
Yeah so then I don't have to hear them crying about wanting [I]their[/I] country back. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=GMScud;704311]I wouldn't go that far. Gibbs is getting peppered with questions about it daily. Most likely it's not as serious as some are saying, but I don't think it's the "nothing to see here, move along" afterthought that the White House claims it to be.[/quote]
Gibbs is referring to the memo because he/they want to stay on message and not give the media a sound bite and keep this thing going for another week. Why create a story when there isn't one? When the president was asked during the his oil spill presser about the "deal", he essentially dodged the question. Smart move. I think Joe Sestak is the best person to answer all the questions and he's doing that. The mistake that was made, if any, was involving Bill Clinton. He's just an easy target. But from what I understand Bill Clinton and Joe Sestak have been close friends for years, so it makes sense that he was the messenger. As far as arm twisting goes, I would say it's organizing your political party to maintain power and advance your agenda. Each party has that right to do that and should position themselves to be as powerful and effective as possible to serve their interests and the people they must answer to. As long as everything is done above board, let's play chess. There's nothing unethical, unusual, or as far as I can see, any impropriety occurred. The irony in all of this is that Sestak is probably more in line with Obama's views than Arlen Specter ever was, so it's still a win for the White House. Anyway, 'nuff of that. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=firstdown;704403]Come on Saden thats not even a very good example.[/quote]
Why? |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=saden1;704417]Why?[/quote]
Because we know your boss would not offer you a raise. LOL |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=saden1;704417]Why?[/quote]
Because your boss isn't trying to thwart/circumvent a country's election process of public officials. To me the whole meat of the matter is the fact the WH must have thought that Sestak had a good shot at winning the majority of the people's vote. They wanted their guy (Specter) to be the voice of the people instead. So, they tell Sestak not to run because we think you may win which means the majority of voters in your district wanted you to win, not the other guy. Does this happen all of the time? Without a doubt. Is it wrong? Without a doubt. |
Re: A Felon in the White House?
[quote=724Skinsfan;704424]Because your boss isn't trying to thwart/circumvent a country's election process of public officials.
To me the whole meat of the matter is the fact the WH must have thought that Sestak had a good shot at winning the majority of the people's vote. They wanted their guy (Specter) to be the voice of the people instead. So, they tell Sestak not to run because we think you may win which means the majority of voters in your district wanted you to win, not the other guy. Does this happen all of the time? Without a doubt. Is it wrong? Without a doubt.[/quote] If this happens all the time without a doubt how is Lord Obama thwarting/circumventing the country's political process of public officials? All of this is he said she said at best. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.