Re: #59
 

[quote=Skinzman;1012800]1 more point per game or 1 more TD per game? Pretty big difference between the two. I get that you hate Garcon for the only reason that you didnt like the signing in the first place. I believe you called him a #3 WR at best at the time of the signing. But to say he doesnt make a difference is laughable. When you are a Redskins fan, its actually ok to like all of them.[/quote]

Actually, with Garcon v. w/out Garcon was a 4 pt. difference.

Though the average scores per game were only a one point difference, when you factor out the defensive scores and only take into consideration offensive scoring it was a 4 pt difference.

Re: #59
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;1012811]Some of are doubting whether or not Fletcher will return after this season. The only way he'll retire is if the Redskins win the Super Bowl. If there is no signs of under performance in Fletcher's game I don't see why the wouldn't offer him at least a 1-year deal heading into 2014......[/quote]

Even if he did have his best season in years you can't keep depending on a guy who is flirting with father time. It might mean a drop in performance, but at some point we need to hand over the reigns to a younger MLB. I think this is Fletch's last year manning the middle.

Re: #59
 

I believe L. Fletcher will have a dominant year in 2013 . If JJ / AC ( DE's ) and Orakpo come back 100 % this year , # 59 is going to look like a heat seeking missile .

Re: #59
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;1012813]Actually, with Garcon v. w/out Garcon was a 4 pt. difference.

Though the average scores per game were only a one point difference, when you factor out the defensive scores and only take into consideration offensive scoring it was a 4 pt difference.[/quote]

Do those figures include Atlanta and Tampa Bay? He technically played but was hardly on the field. We scored 17 and 24 respectively in those games with Garcon getting 4 catches for around 40 yards between the two and playing a very limited amount of plays.

If we dont count the Atlanta and Tampa game as games he played. With Garcon we scored 30 points 5 times. Without him, we scored 30 only twice. With Garcon, we scored less than 20 only once. Against the Giants on Monday night, where Garcon caught the winning TD. Without him, we scored less than 20 points 3 times.

I was really trying to make 2 points. 1) He does make a difference when he is on the field. 2) Bashing Garcon doesnt help in a defense of London Fletcher. His name doesnt even need to brought up to defend London.

Re: #59
 

Arguing against the impact Garcon had is just retarded, but as we know we've been down this road before. Not even worth going there again.

Re: #59
 

[quote=budw38;1012816]I believe L. Fletcher will have a dominant year in 2013 . If JJ / AC ( DE's ) and Orakpo come back 100 % this year , # 59 is going to look like a heat seeking missile .[/quote]

Yeah, to me its really hard to say Fletch is done after watching him dominate the month of December. Ill never forget those performances...