Re: Week 9
 

[quote=punch it in;1154737][IMG]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161106/6288072c9e74b8b4732248f5b6dcaf4c.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

I take back what I said about the Cowboys. There [U]is[/U] one good thing about them.

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=los panda;1154740]vous savez ce que thye dire, un cheval dans le garage est deux dans le sol.[/quote]

I think the meaning of this got lost in translation... As of know it means "You know what they say, a horse in the garage is two in the ground" ...

Re: Week 9
 

[QUOTE=FrenchSkin;1154749]I think the meaning of this got lost in translation... As of know it means "You know what they say, a horse in the garage is two in the ground" ...[/QUOTE]



Isn't that what Panda was trying to say? Lol

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=punch it in;1154750]Isn't that what Panda was trying to say? Lol[/quote]

Lol ok maybe... then if it's a saying I don't know it...

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=FlyerSkin;1154742]It really isn't all that bad if we stay healthy. The rest of the NFC North are the big problems on our schedule, along with Carolina. AZ really isn't that good, and neither is Philly. [B]Dallas can be beat if we play to our potential with few miscues[/B]. I am thinking we will split with Minnesota and GB. I like our chances against the Vikings, and if we can get pressure on Rodgers, we can take them as well, but I would not put money on the GB game. GB is pretty much abandoning the run using Ty Montgomery back there, thus Aaron is just going to sling it out, and play old school GB ball. GB really needs to draft a RB next year. Lacy and Starks both suck.[/quote]

I'm thinking Dallas will come back down to earth a bit, their schedule gets a lot tougher in the second half. Now, they have found ways to win even if it's been against b*d teams, so not totally discounting them. But Green Bay is best team they have played so far, and they caught them before Rodgers started playing well again. In the second half they play Pittsburgh, us who almost beat them back when we were playing our worst football, and Minnesota.. plus they have to visit New York and Philly

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=FrenchSkin;1154749]I think the meaning of this got lost in translation... As of know it means "You know what they say, a horse in the garage is two in the ground" ...[/quote]

lol i meant to say [I]worth[/I].

you know what they say, a horse in the garage is worth 2 in the ground.

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=FrenchSkin;1154749]I think the meaning of this got lost in translation... As of know it means "You know what they say, a horse in the garage is two in the ground" ...[/quote]

Now I know how wars get started. I'm not sure, but I think I read somewhere that los panda's great grandfather was an interpreter for talks between Kaiser Wilhelm and the French government prior to WWI.

President Jimmy Carter visited Poland a long time ago and he thought he said to the crowd "I'd like to know all of you" but, alas, the American translator used the Polish word for "know" in the biblical sense. Fortunately, the crowd realized what happened and cracked up laughing.

Re: Week 9
 

[QUOTE=FrenchSkin;1154751]Lol ok maybe... then if it's a saying I don't know it...[/QUOTE]



So a horse in the garage is worth two in the ground. One live horse is worth two dead ones...that is all I know.

Re: Week 9
 

rappelez-vous juste pour tuer un cheval, vous avez encore besoin d'un cheval.

Re: Week 9
 

Couple things....Big Ben shoulda sat this week. He looks injured.

Carson wentz looks like a different qb from the beginning of the season.

Re: Week 9
 

Dallas Dallas Dallas that's all u hear about

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: Week 9
 

Cleveland should've started McCown.

Re: Week 9
 

This is great that Dallas is 7-1. It'll be even better when we beat them

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: Week 9
 

It would be good for Pittsburgh to beat Dallas next week

Sent from my S6 Edge

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=punch it in;1154762]So a horse in the garage is worth two in the ground. One live horse is worth two dead ones...that is all I know.[/quote]

Got it.

But a Cowboy in the ground is worth 2 Cowboys on the field.

Re: Week 9
 

Aaron Rogers just looks like he doesn't give fucks about football anymore.

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=PorkSkins;1154769]Cleveland should've started McCown.[/quote]

To be fair, I thought the Browns should've stuck with McCown going into the start of the season. He played well last year for them last year. That W/L record wasn't on him.. Most of his career he's played better than he gets credit for. He just seems to get stuck on awful football teams.. He's no Aaron Rodgers but hell, neither is Aaron Rodgers..

Re: Week 9
 

The viks look awful now, they can't score at all. If we lose to them next week we won't be in the playoffs. GB looks bad too.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=frenchskin;1154773]got it.



But a cowboy in the ground is worth 2 cowboys on the field.[/quote]



httr!

Re: Week 9
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1154776]The viks look awful now, they can't score at all. If we lose to them next week we won't be in the playoffs. GB looks bad too.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



I think we need to take both of those games to realistically have a shot given how well (I hate saying this) Dallas is playing. Having dropped a couple of games we should have won (and tying one), we've left ourselves a small margin for error. 4-3-1 is better than we usually are at the midpoint, but 6-2 was well within our grasp and is materially different. But Minn, GB, Carolina look far less scary than they used to. And we have 3 division games left, plus AZ (who knows what team shows up) and Chicago. No excuses not to go on a run, even with TW on the sidelines.

One game at a time. Come out on fire v Minn to start.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=calia;1154780]I think we need to take both of those games to realistically have a shot given how well (I hate saying this) Dallas is playing. Having dropped a couple of games we should have won (and tying one), we've left ourselves a small margin for error. 4-3-1 is better than we usually are at the midpoint, but 6-2 was well within our grasp and is materially different. But Minn, GB, Carolina look far less scary than they used to. And we have 3 division games left, plus AZ (who knows what team shows up) and Chicago. No excuses not to go on a run, [B]even with TW on the sidelines[/B].

One game at a time. Come out on fire v Minn to start.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

The loss of TW for four games scares me. The blindside protection can't be as good as it would be with TW in the game.

Re: Week 9
 

How was that Donald helmet contact on Newton Not called. I personally try to not like Cam as much as possible bc he was taking selfies on the sidelines last year while they were blowing us out .... but that should have been a flag. You cant make contact with a QBs helmet when he is in the pocket.

[url=http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2016/11/06/cam-newton-takes-another-illegal-hit-to-the-head-without-a-flag-vs-rams/]Cam Newton takes another hit to helmet without a flag vs. Rams | Panthers Wire[/url]

Re: Week 9
 

First time seeing this and it's pretty funny and true

He says almost every one of these each post-game conference.....

[url=http://www.101sports.com/2016/10/23/jeff-fisher-rams-postgame-bingo-card/]Jeff Fisher Rams Postgame BINGO Card - 101Sports.com[/url]

edit: i tried posting it but it just comes up as a broken image. Can someone please fix it for me?

Re: Week 9
 

[url=http://www.theredzone.org/BlogDescription/tabid/61/EntryId/59762/Redskins-place-TE-Niles-Paul-on-injured-reserve/Default.aspx]Redskins place TE Niles Paul on injured reserve[/url]

Re: Week 9
 

that's going to hurt our 3 te sets. that's been a pretty effective formation for us.

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1154829]First time seeing this and it's pretty funny and true

He says almost every one of these each post-game conference.....

[url=http://www.101sports.com/2016/10/23/jeff-fisher-rams-postgame-bingo-card/]Jeff Fisher Rams Postgame BINGO Card - 101Sports.com[/url]

edit: i tried posting it but it just comes up as a broken image. Can someone please fix it for me?[/quote]

[IMG]http://wxos.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Fisher-Postgame-BINGO-1.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=over the mountain;1154822]How was that Donald helmet contact on Newton Not called. I personally try to not like Cam as much as possible bc he was taking selfies on the sidelines last year while they were blowing us out .... but that should have been a flag. You cant make contact with a QBs helmet when he is in the pocket.

[url=http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2016/11/06/cam-newton-takes-another-illegal-hit-to-the-head-without-a-flag-vs-rams/]Cam Newton takes another hit to helmet without a flag vs. Rams | Panthers Wire[/url][/quote]

It was a face to face ,Newton standing straight up ,the lineman was in the air and had not control ,I understand the call or non call.To me Newton can't handel the heat anymore he needs to stop crying .

Re: Week 9
 

[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1154781]The loss of TW for four games scares me. The blindside protection can't be as good as it would be with TW in the game.[/QUOTE]



Not to mention his monster run blocking. He's our most consistent and arguably best player on either side of the ball. It's pretty crushing. Not sure how he could have allowed this to happen unless he know the test would be positive. It really hurts us. But they should be good enough to take some of these games anyway. The Patriots just traded one of their beat defensive players and I bet they don't skip a beat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Week 9
 

Didn't watch that game last night but it seems like all kinds of crap is being said about the officiating. Missed and botched calls left and right. Very embarrassing forthe league as a whole. Coaches, players, press and fans are calling out for something to be done about the putrid level of refereeing. This is something the NFL MUST address in the upcoming offseason.

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=Giantone;1154839]It was a face to face ,Newton standing straight up ,the lineman was in the air and had not control ,I understand the call or non call.To me Newton can't handel the heat anymore he needs to stop crying .[/quote]

I dont know how anyone could understand that as a "non call". Newton was a QB in the pocket, not a runner. A defender can not make any contact with a Qb's head.

----------------------------

[url=http://thebiglead.com/2016/11/07/video-richard-sherman-drills-dan-carpenter-is-somehow-only-flagged-for-offsides/]VIDEO: Richard Sherman Drills Dan Carpenter, Is Somehow Only Flagged for Offsides | The Big Lead[/url]
^^ video of the Richard Sherman hit on the Bills kicker.

That absolutely shouldn't have been a personal foul. Sherman jumped, paused, realized the ball was being snapped and there had been no whistles, started toward the block again, got pushed toward the kicker, touched the ball first, collided with Carpenter, and then the first whistle blew.
^^ How a seahawks fan saw the play. Lol
[url=http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=131114]Seahawks.NET - The Voice of the 12th Man! • View topic - Lets Call A Spade A Spade[/url]

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=J. Falcon;1154857]Didn't watch that game last night but it seems like all kinds of crap is being said about the officiating. Missed and botched calls left and right. Very embarrassing forthe league as a whole. Coaches, players, press and fans are calling out for something to be done about the putrid level of refereeing. This is something the NFL MUST address in the upcoming offseason.[/quote]

At this point, I dont blame the refs. I blame the NFL for not making them full time employees. Just pay them 200k annually and be done with it. This is getting ridiculous.

Re: Week 9
 

[QUOTE=over the mountain;1154859]At this point, I dont blame the refs. I blame the NFL for not making them full time employees. Just pay them 200k annually and be done with it. This is getting ridiculous.[/QUOTE]



Well except for rookies they are already pretty much there. I mean since when is even the rookie salary not enough that you do not need a second job? Are you telling me that 6 figures is not enough money to get competent referees? These guys are not even good at their job.
[IMG]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161108/f23bddfe41f59333d185f08f6ad93abb.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Week 9
 

[url=http://www.theredzone.org/BlogDescription/tabid/61/EntryId/59777/Jay-Gruden-says-Redskins-running-game-goes-through-Robert-Kelley--for-now/Default.aspx]Jay Gruden says Redskins running game goes through Robert Kelley, for now[/url]

Re: Week 9
 

[url=http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/heres-why-richard-sherman-wasnt-flagged-for-contact-on-bills-last-play/]Here's why Richard Sherman wasn't flagged for contact on Bills' last play - CBSSports.com[/url]

Another controversial Richard Sherman moment. Last play of the game, Bills w the ball at the Seahawks 15.

Bills Taylor just barely leaves the pocket area when Sherman decks a receiver. No flag bc, apparently, you can straight up blind side hit a receiver once the QB leaves the pocket. You have to make sure you dont hold and the ball isnt going to be thrown to your area.

Ive never heard of this ... but apparently it is right there in the rule book as legal. Im 100% confident that if a redskins tried this, it would be a flag no questions asked. Its a gamble bc you are hoping the ref will have the same view and interpretation as you.

Im not sure Taylor had actually left the pocket when Sherman decked his guy, Taylor was in the process of getting outside the pocket.

Amazed, if a QB leaves the pocket, you can just clean out any receiver. Amazing.

Re: Week 9
 

The league is all about player safety of course.

Re: Week 9
 

[IMG]https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/11/richardshermandancarpenter.jpg&w=1484[/IMG]

You jump ridiculously offsides ... then make sure you touch the football with your fingertips first before you go full speed shoulder into a kicker's leg.

Technically, you can claim they didnt blow the whistle so you didnt stop ... but any person not an asshole would have stopped.

Technically, you did manage to stretch out to get a fingertip on the ball while you committed 99% of the rest of your body into slamming into a kicker's leg.

Just an asshole move all around. Clear intent to injure. I wish these teams played again this year. Fuck Richard Sherman.

[IMG]https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/files/2015/07/richard-sherman-trent-williams-face-530x332.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=over the mountain;1154878][url=http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/heres-why-richard-sherman-wasnt-flagged-for-contact-on-bills-last-play/]Here's why Richard Sherman wasn't flagged for contact on Bills' last play - CBSSports.com[/url]

Another controversial Richard Sherman moment. Last play of the game, Bills w the ball at the Seahawks 15.

Bills Taylor just barely leaves the pocket area when Sherman decks a receiver. No flag bc, apparently, you can straight up blind side hit a receiver once the QB leaves the pocket. You have to make sure you dont hold and the ball isnt going to be thrown to your area.

[B]Ive never heard of this ... but apparently it is right there in the rule book as legal. Im 100% confident that if a redskins tried this, it would be a flag no questions asked. Its a gamble bc you are hoping the ref will have the same view and interpretation as you. [/B]

Im not sure Taylor had actually left the pocket when Sherman decked his guy, Taylor was in the process of getting outside the pocket.

Amazed, if a QB leaves the pocket, you can just clean out any receiver. Amazing.[/quote]

The way I see it, Sherman, or somebody within the Seahawks organisation, found this rule in the rule book earlier in the week, talked about it with the referees before the game, who were like "Huu... *checks the rule book* ... yeah of course you're right, we knew this rule, definitely, I mean, we're referees right?!". So Sherman knew he could it... Because I mean did anyone here knew about this "QB out of the pocket = open bar" rule ?

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=over the mountain;1154878][url=http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/heres-why-richard-sherman-wasnt-flagged-for-contact-on-bills-last-play/]Here's why Richard Sherman wasn't flagged for contact on Bills' last play - CBSSports.com[/url]

Another controversial Richard Sherman moment. Last play of the game, Bills w the ball at the Seahawks 15.

Bills Taylor just barely leaves the pocket area when Sherman decks a receiver. No flag bc, apparently, you can straight up blind side hit a receiver once the QB leaves the pocket. You have to make sure you dont hold and the ball isnt going to be thrown to your area.

Ive never heard of this ... but apparently it is right there in the rule book as legal. Im 100% confident that if a redskins tried this, it would be a flag no questions asked. Its a gamble bc you are hoping the ref will have the same view and interpretation as you.

Im not sure Taylor had actually left the pocket when Sherman decked his guy, Taylor was in the process of getting outside the pocket.

Amazed, if a QB leaves the pocket, you can just clean out any receiver. Amazing.[/quote]

I think it works both ways. I recall Hines Ward de-cleating many defenders away from the ball.

Re: Week 9
 

[quote=over the mountain;1154885][IMG]https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/11/richardshermandancarpenter.jpg&w=1484[/IMG]

You jump ridiculously offsides ... then make sure you touch the football with your fingertips first before you go full speed shoulder into a kicker's leg.

Technically, you can claim they didnt blow the whistle so you didnt stop ... but any person not an asshole would have stopped.

Technically, you did manage to stretch out to get a fingertip on the ball while you committed 99% of the rest of your body into slamming into a kicker's leg.

Just an asshole move all around. Clear intent to injure. I wish these teams played again this year. Fuck Richard Sherman.

[IMG]https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/files/2015/07/richard-sherman-trent-williams-face-530x332.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

Yes - it was his intention to try and clearly injure the bills player. You can't leave it up to the league, its up to the players to take care of sherman on their own. And they will.

Re: Week 9
 

[img]https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14938242_10154860159434574_2572768681681828678_n.jpg?oh=ff5066b6ce5c5469db8d5054a5eb68cb&oe=58C38C6C[/img]