Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

At some point you have to wonder. How much bad luck is a legit problem?

Reuben Foster being carted off with apparent knee injury as I type this.

[url]https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/1130502879880589319?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet[/url]

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=Schneed10;1223880]At some point you have to wonder. How much bad luck is a legit problem?

Reuben Foster being carted off with apparent knee injury as I type this.

[url]https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/1130502879880589319?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet[/url][/quote]

WTF???? Keim says its not good.. So probably just lost him for 2019. This team is so fucked

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Players usually know when their ACL goes, and he was heard crying as the cart took him away.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=Schneed10;1223882]Players usually know when their ACL goes.[/quote]

Damn shame man, he could have been a huge part. Now we have another big hole

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Mason Foster and Shaun Dion Hamilton are now your starting MLBs. Sigh.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Video:

[url]https://twitter.com/SherreeBurruss/status/1130506762518487040?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet[/url]

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Fucking kidding me?!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

yeah he's done

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

3rd play... of OTAs???? Wow.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Just freaking bad luck.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=JWsleep;1223888]3rd play... of OTAs???? Wow.[/quote]

This team is injured more than any I've ever seen, how can this still be ongoing year after yr?

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

We all knew not to expect anything from him this season but I don't think any of us expected injury to be the reason.

I guess we're keeping Mason.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

This is like a scene from a dark comedy

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

On the bright side, Zeke just assaulted someone on camera over the weekend.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

More injury news: Alex Smith

Still with ring external fixator but progress as weight bearing.
A little like erector set, the apparatus undergoes constant modifications.
Clear that at least this season is out of the question.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

With this hot start to the year I think we have a legit chance at breaking the seasonal NFL record for knee/ankle/heel injuries that require a full year to recover!

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1223895]More injury news: Alex Smith

Still with ring external fixator but progress as weight bearing.
A little like erector set, the apparatus undergoes constant modifications.
Clear that at least this season is out of the question.[/quote]

How long before this can be ruled a career-ending injury? We could really use that 12M cap credit from his insurance policy next year.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;1223915]How long before this can be ruled a career-ending injury? We could really use that 12M cap credit from his insurance policy next year.[/quote]

He's getting paid, he ain't retiring any time soon

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1223918]He's getting paid, he ain't retiring any time soon[/quote]

And I'm sure he's nowhere near at a point health-wise, where he can make a decision about his career.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1223918]He's getting paid, he ain't retiring any time soon[/quote]

who said anything about retiring?

Its just the matter of having doctors tell him that he can't play anymore.

This wont affect Alex's pay.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

The shit show has already started. I swear Danny Snyder sold his soul to buy the Redskins. The fine print on the contract was they'll never win a Super Bowl under him.

Fun Fact: The Redskins have never won 11 games while under Dan's ownership (20 years).

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=NC_Skins;1223929]The shit show has already started. I swear Danny Snyder sold his soul to buy the Redskins. The fine print on the contract was they'll never win a Super Bowl under him.

Fun Fact: The Redskins have never won 11 games while under Dan's ownership (20 years).[/quote]

That is a sad 20 years man, We have to be one of the worst teams record wise over that span

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

RF could not be counted on. He was hurt w/ the 49ers and had issues off the field. If the FO was counting on him then shame on them. Sucks that he got hurt though. Put in the rookie from NC. He can run and make tackles and is clean off the field.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1223901]With this hot start to the year I think we have a legit chance at breaking the seasonal NFL record for knee/ankle/heel injuries that require a full year to recover![/QUOTE]



Go big or go home!

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

ACL is official per NFLN

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1223940]ACL is official per NFLN

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk[/quote]

Link/source? I just heard them say "believed to" in the breaking news alert just now on NFLN.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[QUOTE=los panda;1223941]Link/source? I just heard them say "believed to" in the breaking news alert just now on NFLN.[/QUOTE]Rapsheet On Twitter.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1223942]Rapsheet On Twitter.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk[/quote]

"Sources: #Redskins LB Reuben Foster [B]is believed to have[/B] suffered a torn ACL, plus additional damage. The injury has been described as major and significant. He’s seeing specialists to determine the full extent. But a brutal situation for Washington."

Far from official. I believe it's torn but I'll wait for official word.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

I think one aspect of the situation is that the Redskins are in a win-loss situation where they have to take chances on draft picks and FA who might have an injury issue. Taking a gamble on a player who has fallen in the draft or FA because of a history of injuries.

I love Reed, but at some point is it not better to have someone at less talent but who can contribute a full season? That way we don't have to play a replacement with 15 years in the NFL?

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1223930]That is a sad 20 years man, We have to be one of the worst teams record wise over that span[/quote]


139-180-1 since Snyder has owned the team...

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Redskins running back Derrius Guice suffered a hamstring injury and is questionable for the start of training camp, according to two sources. #Redskins #LSU #NFL

Here we go

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1225310]Redskins running back Derrius Guice suffered a hamstring injury and is questionable for the start of training camp, according to two sources. #Redskins #LSU #NFL

Here we go[/quote]

@CraigHoffman

Source confirms @ErinHawksworth report that Derrius Guice tweaked his hamstring while rehabbing.

Not sure it really effects much, because he was already going to be monitored in camp. Also happened a few weeks ago, so has already had time to heal.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

They really need to document everything about injuries. Everything about how it happened, diagnoses, treatment plan, recovery time, etc.

May seem tedious but we are beyond this shit at this point. Ffs

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

Maybe Guice is just going to be one of those guys who's always hurt. Way too early to say that but I get concerned when guys are getting hurt and they're not even on the field. That is Jordan Reed type of shit.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1225316]Maybe Guice is just going to be one of those guys who's always hurt. Way too early to say that but I get concerned when guys are getting hurt and they're not even on the field. That is Jordan Reed type of shit.[/quote]

And he fucked it up rehabbing!!! So he isn’t healthy and we are injuring fukcing guys rehabbing other injuries. This is fucking pissing me off. Like who the fuck is monitoring this shit? Someone is responsible for his rehab plan, right? Fuck man

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

[quote=Chico23231;1225313]They really need to document everything about injuries. Everything about how it happened, diagnoses, treatment plan, recovery time, etc.

May seem tedious but we are beyond this shit at this point. Ffs[/quote]

I am sure they do. My HS teams do. And we have a much smaller staff than the Redskins.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

While frustrating no doubt, reminder that week one is nine weeks away. He’ll get into camp in fine shape.

Re: The Redskins have twice been the most injured team in football. Is that bad luck or bad planning?
 

I look at Guice as a future star on this team. There is a long time until the first game and I hope this doesn't foretell a player who can't seem to get healthy.

The quality that Guice had was explosive running ability. If he is constantly worried about getting hurt, that could affect his tendency to take chances. I hope this is nothing because we have a second-round draft pick locked up in this guy.