![]() |
Re: Bears Postgame
For whatever reason, we typically play the Packers pretty well. Hopefully we can get a nice win.
|
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1325947]For whatever reason, we typically play the Packers pretty well. Hopefully we can get a nice win.[/quote]
They have no offensive identity right now, LaFleur is also not calling good offensive game plans. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1325881]Ron Rivera on reports he didn’t want Carson Wentz and it was Dan Snyder’s move - “That’s bullshit. I’m the fucking guy.”[/quote]
yea, you're the fucking guy tanking the team bro |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1325948]They have no offensive identity right now, LaFleur is also not calling good offensive game plans.[/quote]
If it doesn't conflict with the Braves possible Game 5, I will probably break my not going out for games decision. Hard to pass on watching us play against Aaron Rodgers. Not sure how many more times this will happen. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1325948]They have no offensive identity right now, LaFleur is also not calling good offensive game plans.[/quote]
If we can get pressure on 12 we have a chance. Prob won't win but keep it closer |
Re: Bears Postgame
Oh forgot bad:
Game management piss poor again. I counted two 12 men on the field and at least 1 where we had 10 men on the field. |
Re: Bears Postgame
The only reason we won is because Fields is terrible. Basically if they had any other starting QB in the NFL we would have lost. Our offense is so bad.
|
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1325955]The only reason we won is because Fields is terrible. Basically if they had any other starting QB in the NFL we would have lost. Our offense is so bad.[/quote]
Yeah man I agree, he's the worst QB in the league by far. People say he has no weapons but even when they are wide open he misses them. He's not accurate at all and Only Josh Allen was able to fix that in the history of football. He will be a bust by 2023 |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1325955]The only reason we won is because Fields is terrible. Basically if they had any other starting QB in the NFL we would have lost. Our offense is so bad.[/quote]
3 drives in the redzone resulting in 0 points. That's a killer for them. But that muffed punt did them in. That was a bullshit TD for us. It's so bad it's comical. we are the William hung of the NFL. [IMG]https://media.giphy.com/media/l4hLJ01NBa0fjbqeY/giphy.gif[/IMG] |
Re: Bears Postgame
[QUOTE=SunnySide;1325935]Punch ... brother .. Im guessing you didnt sleep last night and watched the sunrise this morning.
Man was on a roll last night[/QUOTE] Haha. I was sound asleep by 1 am. Able to sleep in today. Three day weekend. I am still sort of in shock that we almost blew that game at the end and about just how close it was. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1325955][B]The only reason we won is because Fields is terrible.[/B] Basically if they had any other starting QB in the NFL we would have lost. Our offense is so bad.[/quote]
True. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1325955]The only reason we won is because Fields is terrible. Basically if they had any other starting QB in the NFL we would have lost. Our offense is so bad.[/quote]
Why do you say that? Here is a stat from last night: No other NFL team in the last 30 years has had 3 drives in one game where they drove 60+ yards to the 5-yard line or closer but scored 0 points I read that and clearly Fields is a generational talent |
Re: Bears Postgame
[URL="https://twitter.com/MarkBullockNFL/status/1580719735229931521?s=20&t=MbRlX7xuxGmY1rpR3DY2mQ"]https://twitter.com/MarkBullockNFL/status/1580719735229931521?s=20&t=MbRlX7xuxGmY1rpR3DY2mQ[/URL]
[URL="https://twitter.com/uSTADIUM/status/1580729124922224641?s=20&t=MGeTxh3B73ctfd8Fo3NcOw"]https://twitter.com/uSTADIUM/status/1580729124922224641?s=20&t=MGeTxh3B73ctfd8Fo3NcOw[/URL] Only thing worse than not having a QB .. being married to a bad QB. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[QUOTE=BaltimoreSkins;1325976]Why do you say that?
Here is a stat from last night: No other NFL team in the last 30 years has had 3 drives in one game where they drove 60+ yards to the 5-yard line or closer but scored 0 points I read that and clearly Fields is a generational talent[/QUOTE] Fields is crazy bad. I remember they called him a generational talent in pre-game and I was confused during game time because he’s one of the worst QBs I’ve seen in awhile. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Bears Postgame
Donny
@treepunx · 16h Eye opening: Ryan Fitzpatrick just said the system in DC is plug-and-play, and it doesn't adjust to a player's strengths or weaknesses. That's a bigger indictment of Ron Rivera and Scott Turner by someone who's been there than I've seen in a long time. #HTTC ---- This is what the talking heads are starting to say, former smart analyst player Like Logan Paulsen as well. We dont cater our play calling around our top players given strengths. Why ARE you throwing a tight slant to McKissic last week vs Titans on 3rd and goal from the 2 and not Terry. Why, in part, Terry is only getting 4 targets a game. Without looking it up .. I bet McKissic has more targets than Terry .. and we arent throwing those screens to mcKissic like we did past 2 years .. we have McKissic running wide receiver routes. FEED TERRY .. ITS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=DynamiteRave;1325979]Fields is crazy bad. I remember they called him a generational talent in pre-game and I was confused during game time because he’s one of the worst QBs I’ve seen in awhile.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote] He is a generational talent. Generationally bad |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=skinsfaninok;1325942][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fe-NJIoUYAEkX5-?format=jpg&name=large[/IMG]
Jon Allen had a 91 pass rush grade last night. Sweat 92 Allen has 5 sacks already Payne has 4 Sweat has 3 When CY gets back this defense will be even better.[/quote] And they still gave up 400 to the worst offense in the league. D-line seems to be doing their jobs the last few weeks, but everyone else is having breakdowns all over the place. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=jamf;1325880]Brob overrated. Our fucking standards are too low.
Rivera is throwing a tantrum.[/quote] Idk if he is overrated or not but here is what I do know, Gibson is the better back. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=SunnySide;1325978][URL="https://twitter.com/MarkBullockNFL/status/1580719735229931521?s=20&t=MbRlX7xuxGmY1rpR3DY2mQ"]https://twitter.com/MarkBullockNFL/status/1580719735229931521?s=20&t=MbRlX7xuxGmY1rpR3DY2mQ[/URL]
[URL="https://twitter.com/uSTADIUM/status/1580729124922224641?s=20&t=MGeTxh3B73ctfd8Fo3NcOw"]https://twitter.com/uSTADIUM/status/1580729124922224641?s=20&t=MGeTxh3B73ctfd8Fo3NcOw[/URL] Only thing worse than not having a QB .. being married to a bad QB.[/quote] What happened to this guy? He looked like a can't miss and now he misses throws a high school QB can make. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1325985]What happened to this guy? He looked like a can't miss and now he misses throws a high school QB can make.[/QUOTE]
Don’t remember thinking of him as a can’t miss. Especially coming out of OSU. Double especially going to Chicago. They might be worse than us at developing quarterbacks throughout the last 40 years. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1325954]Oh forgot bad:
Game management piss poor again. I counted two 12 men on the field and at least 1 where we had 10 men on the field.[/quote] Yeah, and what was that pathetic effort to go for it on 4th down but it was so obvious that we were just trying to get the Bears to jump offsides that the defenders basically stood up and started laughing, knowing that the ball wasn't going to be snapped and that it was a lame effort? BTW, Slye's miss was pretty bad. Could have lost us the game. Had he made it, we would have been up 15-7 and put even more pressure on the Bears. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=calia;1325988]Yeah, and what was that pathetic effort to go for it on 4th down but it was so obvious that we were just trying to get the Bears to jump offsides that the defenders basically stood up and started laughing, knowing that the ball wasn't going to be snapped and that it was a lame effort?
[B]BTW, Slye's miss was pretty bad. Could have lost us the game. Had he made it, we would have been up 15-7 and put even more pressure on the Bears.[/B][/quote] I was watching with Nextgen stats last night. They gave Slye a 53% chance of making it, basically a coin toss, and the recommendation was to go for it on 4th and 4. Making a 4th and 4 is challenging but with time that was left even if you turn it over you run more time off the clock and it is better defensive field position. I don't knock the FG attempt though going up 8 would have been big. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=punch it in;1325987]Don’t remember thinking of him as a can’t miss. Especially coming out of OSU. Double especially going to Chicago. They might be worse than us at developing quarterbacks throughout the last 40 years.[/quote]
Ok maybe can't miss was a bit much but I clearly remember him outplaying Trevor Lawrence in the semi final game. He was making numerous NFL throws at OSU. I think I'm starting to believe that there is a OSU curse when it comes to QB's. Stroud is not draftable. lol. |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=punch it in;1325987]Don’t remember thinking of him as a can’t miss. Especially coming out of OSU. Double especially going to Chicago. They might be worse than us at developing quarterbacks throughout the last 40 years.[/quote]
This is a great parody song of Bears quarterbacks to the tune of 88 lines about 44 women. [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP_Cg9NX7aM[/url] |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1325990]I was watching with Nextgen stats last night. They gave Slye a 53% chance of making it, basically a coin toss, and the recommendation was to go for it on 4th and 4. Making a 4th and 4 is challenging but with time that was left even if you turn it over you run more time off the clock and it is better defensive field position. I don't knock the FG attempt though going up 8 would have been big.[/quote]
I agree with, I think it was Al Michaels, on the broadcast that punting made sense. With Way there's every chance they would have been looking at a 90+yd drive. OK the FG would have meant OT at worst, but instead we have them good field position and barely escaped by inches. RR doesn't seem keen on taking risks until the game is on the line, which to me is backwards. Take risks to get into a winning position, but go with the odds when you protecting a lead. |
Re: Bears Postgame
Are you saying that Ron Rivera makes poor in-game coaching decisions? I'm shocked to hear that! Shocked, I tell you!
|
Re: Bears Postgame
Wentz was visibly Hurting and now we know why. Oh well we needed to see what Howell can do , I don’t want them playing TH. He sucks. We know what he does. Play the rookie
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Bears Postgame
Heinicke is the #2, and should play if Carson can't. I want to see what Howell can do, but he probably isn't the best option right now.
|
Re: Bears Postgame
So, to win, we needed a flukish bounce on a helmet INT, a stupid go for it on 4th down in a 0-0 game by the Bears, a muffed punt and a highly questionable non DPI call on the previous to last play by the Bears, and we still managed to almost lose the game on their final play...
We are literally witnessing history. Cuz we're historically bad. Positives: -Efe Obada seems to be a nice pick up -Robinson is a nice story -My game ball still goes to Wentz for pancaking Roquan Smith. Highlight of the game. Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=FrenchSkin;1326030]So, to win, we needed a flukish bounce on a helmet INT, a stupid go for it on 4th down in a 0-0 game by the Bears, a muffed punt and a highly questionable non DPI call on the previous to last play by the Bears, and we still managed to almost lose the game on their final play...
Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk[/quote] "Just win, Baby!" - Al Davis |
Re: Bears Postgame
[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1326033]"Just win, Baby!" - Al Davis[/QUOTE]Honestly, I'm stupid enough to still enjoy this W. Just not gonna fool me into believing we have a shot next week.
Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk |
Re: Bears Postgame
[quote=FrenchSkin;1326030]So, to win, we needed a flukish bounce on a helmet INT, a stupid go for it on 4th down in a 0-0 game by the Bears, a muffed punt and a highly questionable non DPI call on the previous to last play by the Bears, and we still managed to almost lose the game on their final play...
We are literally witnessing history. Cuz we're historically bad. Positives: -Efe Obada seems to be a nice pick up -Robinson is a nice story -My game ball still goes to Wentz for pancaking Roquan Smith. Highlight of the game. Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk[/quote] Can I add a controversial positive? Andrew Norwell :) |
Re: Bears Postgame
[QUOTE=FrenchSkin;1326034]Honestly, I'm stupid enough to still enjoy this W. Just not gonna fool me into believing we have a shot next week.
Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk[/QUOTE] Well the Packers look like they don’t care. We are probably their get right game. Sigh. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Bears Postgame
all we have to do to be a reasonable team is:
1) fix the coaching 2) fix the o-line 3) fix the secondary that should be simple. I mean, we have 10 days! /sarcasm |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.