Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326726]Rodgers was Check-Down Susie yesterday. And his demeanor was straight up doo-doo-butter.

I like winning.[/quote]

Would you even say discount double check down?

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326726]Rodgers was Check-Down Susie yesterday. And his demeanor was straight up doo-doo-butter.

I like winning.[/quote]

That's because he has no WRs.. I can't believe he agreed to come back to that lol..

If we beat Indy and then Min.. I'll be back on the wagon

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1326728]Would you even say discount double check down?[/quote]

Haha, I did almost go with Discount-Double-Check-Down-Susie. That takes a bit too much time to roll of the tongue though.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1326729]That's because he has no WRs.. I can't believe he agreed to come back to that lol..

[B]If we beat Indy[/B] and then Min.. I'll be back on the wagon[/quote]

The totally Commanders thing to do would be to win 2 in a row, then have this completely winnable game, and completely shit the bed.

Don't be the Commanders this week, be a decent/good team.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326731]The totally Commanders thing to do would be to win 2 in a row, then have this completely winnable game, and completely shit the bed.

Don't be the Commanders this week, be a decent/good team.[/quote]

I hope not. I will watch the game in person.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=GridIron26;1326732]I hope not. I will watch the game in person.[/quote]

Nice. Root for me too, I won't be able to watch this game.

Would be sweet to win, and set up a game against Captain Kurt to try to get above .500.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326730]Haha, I did almost go with Discount-Double-Check-Down-Susie. That takes a bit too much time to roll of the tongue though.[/quote]

I don't get the Susie reference but I think you change it to Charlie instead of Susie. Sounds better your have the alliteration.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

I will say ST finally started getting Gibson back involved and running the ball. Imagine if he would have done that against Detroit, Dallas and Tennessee. I think we have at least two more wins then.

Heineken as expected. As Chief pointed out could have thrown 4 more ints. He struggles passing under pressure, but definitely gets the offense moving.

Del Rio he might be an ass hat but he is an ass hat that learned a new trick. Rodgers refuses to check into runs with 8 in the box. Well done.

LaFleur and Rodgers are perfect for each other they both think they are the smartest person in the room even though they are so obviously not.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=DynamiteRave;1326672]The team just plays differently with Heinicke under center. He’s above average and he won’t get you to the promised land but the offense plays like men possessed when he’s under center.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

Ya know…I think you are right. It’s kinda crazy

One thing is TH is able to survive the bad protection. I’d really like to see more RPO…keep doing the bootlegs.

And fo lawds sakes…quit throwing that WR screen, everyone sees it coming. Throw it once a game

Re: Packers Postgame
 

Did Davis look good yesterday, or was it just me?

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326726]Rodgers was Check-Down [B]Bussy[/B] yesterday. And his demeanor was straight up doo-doo-butter.

I like winning.[/quote]

Jamf approved edit

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326739]Did Davis look good yesterday, or was it just me?[/quote]

he's been looking good for a few weeks now

Re: Packers Postgame
 

I can’t believe that Green Bay front office gave AR that group of receivers.

Embarrassing

Re: Packers Postgame
 

Lol

[url]https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2022/10/23/former-packers-te-jace-sternberger-crafted-this-epic-troll-tweet-about-terry-mclaurin/[/url]

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=MTK;1326741]he's been looking good for a few weeks now[/quote]

Hopefully it continues for the rest of the season. Could be one of our bigger storylines going into next season having him play like a Bonafide starter at a long-term position of weakness.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1326747]Hopefully it continues for the rest of the season. Could be one of our bigger storylines going into next season having him play like a Bonafide starter at a long-term position of weakness.[/quote]

Agreed -- Davis seems like he's sorting things out. Still a ways to go, but he was definitely solid yesterday. Right now, the glaring weakness on D appears to be Kendall Fuller. What a shame.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=GridIron26;1326745]Lol

[url]https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2022/10/23/former-packers-te-jace-sternberger-crafted-this-epic-troll-tweet-about-terry-mclaurin/[/url][/quote]That is awesome! Loved his td catch yesterday. He had a great game.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=GridIron26;1326745]Lol

[url]https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2022/10/23/former-packers-te-jace-sternberger-crafted-this-epic-troll-tweet-about-terry-mclaurin/[/url][/quote]

That’s awesome

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=Chico23231;1326740]Jamf approved edit[/quote]

Does Boyscout know what a bussy is?

SD, a Bussy is what Father lumpy lap at church calls alter boy buttholes, BoyPussy.
They do this because gay butt sex is a sin in the Roman Catholic Church but Bussy sex is ok since the boys aren't really men yet.

Source: Holy Cross Roman Catholic Church near the 805/94 Freeways.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=jamf;1326762]Does Boyscout know what a bussy is?

SD, a Bussy is what Father lumpy lap at church calls alter boy buttholes, BoyPussy.
They do this because gay butt sex is a sin in the Roman Catholic Church but Bussy sex is ok since the boys aren't really men yet.

Source: Holy Cross Roman Catholic Church near the 805/94 Freeways.[/quote]

SD never made it to Boyscouts he only made it to Weblos

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1326763]SD never made it to Boyscouts he only made it to Weblos[/quote]

I had no idea what a bussy was. And I don't think I will be using that reference lol.

[IMG]https://scoutingwire.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/george-costanza-v2.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Packers Postgame
 

I wish that Taylor had Josh Allen or Mahomes physical ability.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1326742]I can’t believe that Green Bay front office gave AR that group of receivers.

Embarrassing[/QUOTE]


Yup. Rodgers isn’t the problem. When Ty Cobb is your best wr and he is old and hurt thats the problem.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

I didn't get to watch the game. Highlights looked like another crazy ending. HTTR.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=CrustyRedskin;1326798]I didn't get to watch the game. Highlights looked like another crazy ending. HTTR.[/quote]

A win always feels good no matter what

:Smoker:

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=Chico23231;1326799]A win always feels good no matter what

:Smoker:[/quote]

And this one feels very different from last week IMO. Last week was a flukish win over a very bad team. Yes the Packs have their issues, but this was a legit win, overcoming an ugly start.

Packers Postgame
 

[QUOTE=FrenchSkin;1326803]And this one feels very different from last week IMO. Last week was a flukish win over a very bad team. Yes the Packs have their issues, but this was a legit win, overcoming an ugly start.[/QUOTE]


Even down 14-3 we were outplaying them. They really took a huge step back this year. Their wr’s are literally non existent.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=FrenchSkin;1326803]And this one feels very different from last week IMO. Last week was a flukish win over a very bad team. Yes the Packs have their issues, but this was a legit win, overcoming an ugly start.[/quote]

Playing tough defense and running the ball like we did. This is the only way we win.

But it feels good to out physical your opponent

Re: Packers Postgame
 

We played like winners yesterday. Big contrast to AR, who looked like he’d rather be fishing.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=HTTR;1326810]We played like winners yesterday. Big contrast to AR, who looked like he’d rather be fishing.[/quote]

I loved that the game ended with him face down in the turf at FedEx (he's lucky he's wearing a helmet, or that crappy field would have broken his face). The Bills are going to kick the living shit out of them next week.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=calia;1326753]Agreed -- Davis seems like he's sorting things out. Still a ways to go, but he was definitely solid yesterday. [B]Right now, the glaring weakness on D appears to be Kendall Fuller.[/B] What a shame.[/quote]

I hate to see Kendall Fuller criticized because of the failure of the FO to get us decent outside corners. Fuller is playing outside because he is so versatile and he is the best option for us there right now. You may recall that he was a tremendous slot corner earlier in his career, a real playmaker. That's where he should be playing to be at his best.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1326815]I hate to see Kendall Fuller criticized because of the failure of the FO to get us decent outside corners. Fuller is playing outside because he is so versatile and he is the best option for us there right now. You may recall that he was a tremendous slot corner earlier in his career, a real playmaker. That's where he should be playing to be at his best.[/quote]

Even though Fuller gets burned here and there, he still makes plays and is our second best CB. WJ3 on the other hand, doesn’t belong in an NFL roster, Wildgoose is still green and learning.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=calia;1326813]I loved that the game ended with him face down in the turf at FedEx (he's lucky he's wearing a helmet, or that crappy field would have broken his face). The Bills are going to kick the living shit out of them next week.[/quote]It really could get ugly. Think GB will go all out to try to get the W. Doubt it matters really. Bills are loaded.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[url]https://twitter.com/PeteHaileyNBCS/status/1584559682571714560[/url]

Peter King going hard on DS here. You love to see it.

Re: Packers Postgame
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1326815]I hate to see Kendall Fuller criticized because of the failure of the FO to get us decent outside corners. Fuller is playing outside because he is so versatile and he is the best option for us there right now. You may recall that he was a tremendous slot corner earlier in his career, a real playmaker. That's where he should be playing to be at his best.[/quote]

A fair point, but the fact is that he's been asked to guard the perimeter and he hasn't been good.