Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=MTK;1223837]I don't care what he does in his own time, can we win games for us? A lot of them hopefully? That's all I want to know.[/quote]

If he plays to his potential I'll start a GoFundMe page to reimburse him for the car.

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[URL="http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/38520/how-dwayne-haskins-mind-helped-convince-redskins-to-draft-him"]How Dwayne Haskins' brain helped convince Redskins to draft him[/URL]

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=MTK;1223877][URL="http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/38520/how-dwayne-haskins-mind-helped-convince-redskins-to-draft-him"]How Dwayne Haskins' brain helped convince Redskins to draft him[/URL][/quote]

I'd be surprised if he wasn't QB1 after August

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=MTK;1223877][URL="http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/38520/how-dwayne-haskins-mind-helped-convince-redskins-to-draft-him"]How Dwayne Haskins' brain helped convince Redskins to draft him[/URL][/quote]

This kid is definitely a Ravenclaw! As the house motto goes, *"Wit beyond measure is man's greatest treasure."

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=Bishop Hammer;1224035]This kid is definitely a Ravenclaw! As the house motto goes, *"Wit beyond measure is man's greatest treasure."[/quote]

Keim said that he's as mature of a rookie QB that he has seen in DC. Love this pick even more.

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

I haven't been to training camp in several years might have to make the drive this year.

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=NYCskinfan82;1224041]I haven't been to training camp in several years might have to make the drive this year.[/quote]

I may do the same bro. It's a little further for me but would be cool

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

Good podcast from Keim with Louis Riddick about Haskins. Couple things, Riddick says team should be patient with Haskins BUT the problem is gonna be this preseason when the fans see him throw versus Keenum...its not a comparison, Haskins' arm and the way he deliver the ball to receivers will be better than Case.

Riddick sees the biggest problem with Skins offense is talent on the Receiver....health of Oline to an extent. BUT the skins need someone to step up on the outside and Crowder is a serious loss in the slot....unproven replacement.

also...brief sentence about Erik Flowers at OTAs...Keim said not good. Same issues.

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=Chico23231;1224103]Good podcast from Keim with Louis Riddick about Haskins. Couple things, Riddick says team should be patient with Haskins BUT the problem is gonna be this preseason when the fans see him throw versus Keenum...its not a comparison, Haskins' arm and the way he deliver the ball to receivers will be better than Case.

Riddick sees the biggest problem with Skins offense is talent on the outside....health of Oline to an extent. BUT the skins need someone to step up on the outside and Crowder is a serious loss in the slot....unproven replacement.[/quote]

I hope Jay and co. can get creative for Haskins

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1224104]I hope Jay and co. can get creative for Haskins[/quote]

Jay creative? Prepare yourself to be disappointed.

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1224105]Jay creative? Prepare yourself to be disappointed.[/QUOTE]I would really like to hear an explanation of last year's debacle as detailed in Cooley's series of podcasts.

Jay was a very good offensive mind in Cincy. The notion that he turned into a complete dunce isn't plausible.

I haven't heard anything resembling an explanation of the disjointed approach of the running v passing.

There has been a a lot of innuendo particularly from Sheehan that Callahan and Jay were an arranged marriage by the Prince of Darkness.

Any explanation would satisfy a lot of curiosity.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=DYoungJelly;1224107]I would really like to hear an explanation of last year's debacle as detailed in Cooley's series of podcasts.

Jay was a very good offensive mind in Cincy. The notion that he turned into a complete dunce isn't plausible.

I haven't heard anything resembling an explanation of the disjointed approach of the running v passing.

There has been a a lot of innuendo particularly from Sheehan that Callahan and Jay were an arranged marriage by the Prince of Darkness.

Any explanation would satisfy a lot of curiosity.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk[/quote]

I think a lack of options had a lot to do with the plays we ran.

Realistically, how much of a playbook can you expect to run with Josh Johnson and Mark Sanchez under center?

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

Kevin O'Connell will have a lot of input on the offense this year...he will put his stamp on it.

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[QUOTE=sevier2;1224109]I think a lack of options had a lot to do with the plays we ran.



Realistically, how much of a playbook can you expect to run with Josh Johnson and Mark Sanchez under center?[/QUOTE]The limitations don't explain the the disconnection between the run and pass game.

In other words, the new personnel doesn't explain why the runs don't look like the passes.

The team continued to rely on play action into the TN and Philly games without getting any LBs to bite.

Disagree?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: Dwayne Haskins
 

[quote=DYoungJelly;1224111]The limitations don't explain the the disconnection between the run and pass game.

In other words, the new personnel doesn't explain why the runs don't look like the passes.

The team continued to rely on play action into the TN and Philly games without getting any LBs to bite.

Disagree?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk[/quote]

I'll agree there are formation issues that need to be acknowledged. The whole "73% Run plays while Sprinkle is in" or whatever the stat was, is just inexcusable.

Regarding the play action late in the season; I can see why they would go that route. We had/have ZERO threats on the outside. Our entire offense practically came down to what AP could give us. As our only legitimate threat (Remember he went 90 yards against the Eagles) it would make sense to try and bait a defense into thinking he was getting the rock.

I think you're right and there's a legitimate case to be made that having Callahan call the run plays while Gruden calls pass plays (With O'Connell's input?) just sort of clogs up the play calling. Too many cooks in the kitchen, so to say.