![]() |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1221218]I get that here in Bills country and that is even worse.. At least Philly has a SB ring...[/QUOTE]
Ugh. You has to remind us of that. I liked them better when they’d never won anything. And I didn’t like them then. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
This almost certainly won't happen because Hockenson wont fall to us, but I like it.
[URL="https://www.hogshaven.com/2019/4/9/18301780/a-glimpse-at-a-possible-new-look-redskins-offense"]https://www.hogshaven.com/2019/4/9/18301780/a-glimpse-at-a-possible-new-look-redskins-offense[/URL] |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
This time of year is funny because anytime a name is mentioned someone responds with he's not going to last until our pick. Well, someone has to be there, 50 guys can't go in 14 picks lol
|
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
I agree with changing Reeds role... If we're competent enough to pull it off for best results
|
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[quote=MTK;1221227]This time of year is funny because anytime a name is mentioned someone responds with he's not going to last until our pick. Well, someone has to be there, 50 guys can't go in 14 picks lol[/quote]
You nailed it. Jonathan Allen wasn't supposed to be there for us at 17, either. |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[quote=Schneed10;1221233]You nailed it.
Jonathan Allen wasn't supposed to be there for us at 17, either.[/quote] Good point guys. (Neither was Guice in the second, but that's a special case.) |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[quote=FrenchSkin;1221237]Good point guys.
(Neither was Guice in the second, but that's a special case.)[/quote] I do wonder which team was spreading the false rumors about Guice to call him to fall so far. Wonder if it was us. |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
According to Keim, Redskins might be reluctant to trade Rosen for our 2nd round pick. It is good to know that Redskins aren't likely to give up a lot for Rosen as this will allow us to strengthening the team for future.
[url]http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/38344/josh-rosen-trade-makes-sense-for-redskins-but-not-at-all-costs[/url] |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[quote=GridIron26;1221252]According to Keim, Redskins might be reluctant to trade Rosen for our 2nd round pick. It is good to know that Redskins aren't likely to give up a lot for Rosen as this will allow us to strengthening the team for future.
[url]http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/38344/josh-rosen-trade-makes-sense-for-redskins-but-not-at-all-costs[/url][/quote] Depends on what we end up doing with our 1st and 2nd round picks. If we refuse to trade our 2nd for rosen, but use our first one one of this year's sh*tty project QBs, then we're really not strengthening our team for the future. |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
If they balk over a 2nd they’re dumb
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[quote=MTK;1221256]If they balk over a 2nd they’re dumb
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote] Agree Guy's a 1st rounder one year and all of a sudden not worth a 2nd the next? Makes no sense. I can see digging in your heels and not giving up the 1st rounder. But I think eventually on draft day or right before, the price goes to the Redskins 2nd plus a mid or low pick next year too. I think they'll end up doing it, regardless of the kind of stuff being leaked to Keim and Finlay around this time (posturing). |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
[quote=MTK;1221256]If they balk over a 2nd they’re dumb
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote] Its just not consistent logic...which is par for the course. Josh Rosen...Widely considered 2-3rd best QB last year...considered this year the best-2nd QB prospect in the group this year. But 33 year old Alex Smith (Avg QB) 70+ guaranteed, 3rd round pick and a young DB stud? Its laughable how bad Bruce is at the QB position. |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
To be fair though this is what Keim said, I don't get the impression that a 2nd will be an issue
[QUOTE]But a third-rounder? No-brainer. A second? It'll take some convincing, but it shouldn't be a deterrent -- and if the Redskins want, they can always recoup the lost pick by trading back in the first round.[/QUOTE] |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
Agree. There are leaks to Finlay and others that the Redskins are reluctant to offer higher than a 3rd rounder. To me, that's clear and obvious posturing through the media, those leaks are probably coming from Bruce himself.
They don't want to give up their 1st, Arizona wants to save face by getting as much as they can for Rosen, to me the price clearly ends up at a 2nd rounder and change. It's so clear and obvious to me that's where it's going. |
Re: Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available
Here's a question - would you rather trade our 2nd or both our 3rd for Rosen?
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.