Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=GridIron26;1281322]I like this move, leaving no stone unturned. Reyes looks athletic, it will be interesting to see how he translate it on the field when hitting/tackling is live.. At worse, he will contribute something to the team a little more than T. Moss ever did.[/QUOTE]I like getting TEs from the basketball side of sports. It seems to be a good crossover position in terms of find open spots, size matchups, and quick burst speed.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1281325]I like getting TEs from the basketball side of sports. It seems to be a good crossover position in terms of find open spots, size matchups, and quick burst speed.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]


.... and, an instinctive use of the body to shield the defender from the ball ... great in the red zone, like rebounding in a crowded lane.


We'll see how this goes -- can't hurt to see how it plays out. Maybe he's a diamond in the rough.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Interesting read ... another QB turned TE ... similar measurements to Logan Thomas.

With this guy, and the dude from Chili/hoopster at Tulane, maybe RR saw no need to keep Moss around.

[url]https://riggosrag.com/2021/04/13/washington-football-teams-next-breakout-te-may-already-roster/[/url]

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Might be fantasy, but imagine these 2 work out as strong backups to/equivalent of Thomas. We might not need to draft a TE, leaving us free to use the picks on other needs. A 3 TE set with these guys might be a real boon in the red zone.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=AnonEmouse;1281331]Might be fantasy, but imagine these 2 work out as strong backups to/equivalent of Thomas. We might not need to draft a TE, leaving us free to use the picks on other needs. A 3 TE set with these guys might be a real boon in the red zone.[/quote]


We can dream!

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Yeah, I bet they don't draft a TE. At least it is not a priority now with six on the roster. Some dudes that are pretty green at the position, but if they can coach 'em up - could be a good group.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

This tidbit about our Chilean TE is encouraging ....

[url]https://twitter.com/thorku/status/1379836018065465348?s=20[/url]


I have no idea how accurate these profiles are, but you gotta like a guy who scores higher than Kyle Pitts -- or any other TE - ever - for that matter.

I guess I can see why RR didn't wait to sign him.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1281310]We did a great job at coaching up Thomas... [B]this new guy seems super athletic[/B][/quote]

"According to NFL Network analyst and long-time NFL football executive, Scott Pioli, Reyes ran a 4.64 in the 40 yard dash and reached 31 bench press reps while producing a 40″ vertical and 10’5″ leap in the broad jump."

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1281342]"According to NFL Network analyst and long-time NFL football executive, Scott Pioli, Reyes ran a 4.64 in the 40 yard dash and reached 31 bench press reps while producing a 40″ vertical and 10’5″ leap in the broad jump."[/QUOTE]

Basically, he's a slower, stronger version of Montez Sweat?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Worth pointing out, multiple teams were interested in signing Reyes but he chose the Skins as we were early in interest and the agent preferred Ron combined with our TE coach who has a solid history of developing TE talent

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=AnonEmouse;1281343]Basically, he's a slower, stronger version of Montez Sweat?[/quote]

That will have the ball in his hands!

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Sweat did OK with the ball in his hands last season :)

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210414/68ef8d5bcb39fb0def1114f0d6f3d676.jpg[/IMG]

Redwolves fans are crying..

Of this list only Warriors makes real sense. I’d just keep it WFT

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1281375][IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210414/68ef8d5bcb39fb0def1114f0d6f3d676.jpg[/IMG]

Redwolves fans are crying..

Of this list only Warriors makes real sense. I’d just keep it WFT[/quote]



Gotta write in Washington Football Team. Avoid voting for any other option.


Having said that ...

On that list ...

DCFC
Warriors

But I think Snyder wants Warriors so that taints it quite a bit.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

It it's Rubies or Rising I'll have a nervous breakdown. Some of the other names are pretty cool.

What is a Swifts?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

This is what happens when you take in 10K suggestions or whatever it was lol

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1281375][IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210414/68ef8d5bcb39fb0def1114f0d6f3d676.jpg[/IMG]

Redwolves fans are crying..

Of this list only Warriors makes real sense. I’d just keep it WFT[/QUOTE]Where is this? I can't find it on their site?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

If that poll is by the WFT, my guess is they are simply winnowing out the least likely by putting warriors against a bunch of non-starters. Probably will see a slew of these and eventually get to some form of redwolves vs warriors.



Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

DCFC sounds cool

That way Redskins still not replaced

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1281379]Where is this? I can't find it on their site?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

Out of this list -

1) The Washington Warriors
2) Washington Renegades

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1273557]Maybe Mac Jones in the draft if he falls to the 2nd round (doubtful).[/quote]

No way. A team would trade back up to bottom of 1st round to get him a 5th year, $30M savings when you consider current QB contracts.

If he fell that far.
If he was sitting untaken beginning of day 2, would be trade ups top of 2nd round.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1281375][IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210414/68ef8d5bcb39fb0def1114f0d6f3d676.jpg[/IMG]

Redwolves fans are crying..

Of this list only Warriors makes real sense. I’d just keep it WFT[/quote]

There's MORE (total garbage)!

Source: [url]https://twitter.com/JPFinlayNBCS/status/1382496846250119168[/url]





[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ey-djbLWEAQl8PW?format=jpg&name=large[/img]

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Redvolves or Warriors or don't change. What happened to Redtails? I liked that one.


The WORST is Washington Capital City Football Club (CCFC).


WTF at Wayfarers, Monarchs, Rubies and Rising. I'd rather stay Football Team than most of these choices.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Just keep WFT if those are the options

Rubies? Swift? Capital City?

WTF?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1281395]Just keep WFT if those are the options

Rubies? Swift? Capital City?

WTF?[/quote]

If we are Rubies i swear i am done with this team , that will be the final nail.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Does anyone really refer to DC as Capital City?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

I don't see any way they change it now, even if they "Picked one" it would piss off so many other fans... They will keep it WFT

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Monkeydad;1281393]There's MORE (total garbage)!

Source: [url]https://twitter.com/JPFinlayNBCS/status/1382496846250119168[/url]





[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ey-djbLWEAQl8PW?format=jpg&name=large[/img][/quote]

From this list
1) Redwolves

rest are garbage....

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Honestly nothing will replace Redskins... Redwolves, Warriors , Wolves etc are all dumb.

The Washington Football Team is clean and timeless, put the W on the helmet and call it done.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Scalper;1281384]No way. A team would trade back up to bottom of 1st round to get him a 5th year, $30M savings when you consider current QB contracts.

If he fell that far.
If he was sitting untaken beginning of day 2, would be trade ups top of 2nd round.[/quote]

LOL, yeah I think I posted this back in the beginning of January dude. Things have obviously changed since then with Mr. Mac Jones...

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1281405]Honestly nothing will replace Redskins... Redwolves, Warriors , Wolves etc are all dumb.

The Washington Football Team is clean and timeless, put the W on the helmet and call it done.[/quote]

The more time that passes, the more I like this identity...it feels like the Redskins can live on like this. It's almost like a permanent throwback identity and uniform.

We just need to design some classic-looking uniforms to go with it...I vote for the 1932s WITH leather helmets.


[img]https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.businessinsider.com%2Fimage%2F5096be7f6bb3f73807000016%2Fimage.jpg&f=1&nofb=1[/img]

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Monkeydad;1281410]The more time that passes, the more I like this identity...it feels like the Redskins can live on like this. It's almost like a permanent throwback identity and uniform.

We just need to design some classic-looking uniforms to go with it...I vote for [B]the 1932s WITH leather helmets[/B].


[img]https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.businessinsider.com%2Fimage%2F5096be7f6bb3f73807000016%2Fimage.jpg&f=1&nofb=1[/img][/quote]

I'm in favor for the uniform, it is my favorite one.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1281399]Does anyone really refer to DC as Capital City?[/quote]

Looks like someone was watching the Simpsons when they thought of this name:

[YT]EZTZ-jm2XB4[/YT]

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Ahh, found more! Red Hogs makes an apperance.

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ey-CGP1WUAES3Kk?format=jpg&name=large[/img]


The 32 FCs.

Demon Cats!

Anchors!



And according to this tweet, there's a 4th survey out there including:

Aces
First City Football Club (FCFC)
Archers
Beacons
Belters
[B]Redtails[/B]
Razorbacks
Defenders
[B]Football Team[/B]


[url]https://twitter.com/Mike_Callow/status/1382458747356917766[/url]




So noticing a trend here on these survey lists. There's ONE good, "popular" choice on each.

Redwolves, Warriors, Red Tails and Red Hogs aren't going up against each other. Football Team and Redtails are matched up though, so one will be going away. The competition for each are all garbage, ridiculous names with no hope of being accepted.

I think we're seeing the strategic development of the final choices with the appearance of "listening to all fans who made a submission".

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

So Dan vs. Bruce in court:

[URL="https://twitter.com/BenStandig/status/1382719115836731399"]@BenStandig[/URL]
New legal filings on behalf of Washington Football Team owner Daniel Snyder show a new target: Bruce Allen.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=Monkeydad;1281417]Ahh, found more!





32s.



Demon Cats!







[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ey-CGP1WUAES3Kk?format=jpg&name=large[/img][/QUOTE]Its a yougov petition poll no way is it indicative of the team's intentions.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1281418]Its a yougov petition poll no way is it indicative of the team's intentions.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

There's no proof either way if the team is behind the surveys or not.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=Monkeydad;1281421]There's no proof either way if the team is behind the surveys or not.[/QUOTE]They may be behind it but regardless it isn't anymore than a winnowing tool for the large pool of names that are being floated around. It has very little bearing on the main names in consideration unless one of those oddball ones suddenly rise. In NCAA terms the final four are likely WFT, Warriors, Wolves( or redwolves) and then whichever cinderella name pops from surveys like that one.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1281430]They may be behind it but regardless it isn't anymore than a winnowing tool for the large pool of names that are being floated around. It has very little bearing on the main names in consideration unless one of those oddball ones suddenly rise. In NCAA terms the final four are likely WFT, Warriors, Wolves( or redwolves) and then whichever cinderella name pops from surveys like that one.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

If there's thousands or millions of votes, I'm sure they'll reference it and factor it into the decision.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

Washington Anchors lol