Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Sonny9TD;1011757]290 catches with better receivers who were targeted more and Jason Campbell at QB says he is pretty good. 12 year career. That is why he stayed in the league. Not vise versa. If you don't believe he was any good then that is what you believe but the fact he is a pro catching 290 catches and 22 touchdowns says that he is pretty good.[/quote]

Now how many years did he have Jason Campbell again??

[url=http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/1318/james-thrash]James Thrash Stats - ESPN[/url]

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=SmootSmack;1011762]Why do you keep bringing up Jason Campbell? Campbell only threw 3 TD passes to James Thrash (2 of which were in the same game)[/quote]

Because he wasn't that good. Thrash would have caught more with a better QB. Donovan McNabb is an great example. But doesn't catching 2 TD passes in one game back up the point he was pretty good. Yea I think it does.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Sonny9TD;1011768]Because he wasn't that good. Thrash would have caught more with a better QB. Donovan McNabb is an great example. But doesn't catching 2 TD passes in one game back up the point he was pretty good. Yea I think it does.[/quote]

Plenty of guys have caught multiple TDs in the same game. That doesnt mean he is good. 290 catches over 12 years shows that he wasnt. 22 TDs over 12 years (14 of which came in two years so he had 8 over the other 10 years) shows that he isn't good. James Thrash was at best a 3rd or 4th option for the major part of his career. Simple as that.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1011767]Now how many years did he have Jason Campbell again??

[url=http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/1318/james-thrash]James Thrash Stats - ESPN[/url][/quote]

Jason is a synonym for all the other great QBs we have had until now and Donovan. But tell me why James Thrash isn't pretty good again.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Mattyk;1011766]lol 290 catches and 22 TDs over 12 years is an avg of 24 catches and less than 2 scores, my lord what are we even talking about here?[/quote]

lol that you don't think he is any good which is absurd

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Sonny9TD;1011770]Jason is a synonym for all the other great QBs we have had until now and Donovan. But tell me why James Thrash isn't pretty good again.[/quote]

Because it took him 12 years to accomplish what it takes some WRs two or three years to. That is the first reason.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

So Goat has Jabar Gaffney and now Sonny has James Thrash. Can't wait until the next person comes in and trolls us with Malcolm Kelly or Cliff Russell crap.

[QUOTE=Sonny9TD;1011771]lol that you don't think he is any good.[/QUOTE]

I said he was solid. He was better on special teams than he was at receiver.

He was far from being pretty good. Sorry but I reserve that type of description for guys that avg a lot more than 24 catches a year and 2 TDs.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1011774]So Goat has Jabar Gaffney and now Sonny has James Thrash. Can't wait until the next person comes in and trolls us with Malcolm Kelly or Cliff Russell crap.[/quote]


Well now you are finally making sense.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Sonny9TD;1011768]Because he wasn't that good. Thrash would have caught more with a better QB. Donovan McNabb is an great example. But doesn't catching 2 TD passes in one game back up the point he was pretty good. Yea I think it does.[/quote]

You gotta be kidding me.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

your trolling at this point. I don'y think anyone with an inkling of Skins past receivers would think Thrash is anything more than a special team guy. I certainly would want him as a back up slot guy and on teams, but your team is in trouble if he was one of your starting pair.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Mattyk;1011775]I said he was solid. He was better on special teams than he was at receiver.

He was far from being pretty good. Sorry but I reserve that type of description for guys that avg a lot more than 24 catches a year and 2 TDs.[/quote]

OK that is fine but you still haven't told me which receivers that were any better other than Santana Garcon and Cooley which I mentioned.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Chico23231;1011778]your trolling at this point. I don'y think anyone with an inkling of Skins past receivers would think Thrash is anything more than a special team guy. I certainly would want him as a back up slot guy and on teams, but your team is in trouble if he was one of your starting pair.[/quote]

Definitely trolling.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[quote=Chico23231;1011778]your trolling at this point. I don'y think anyone with an inkling of Skins past receivers would think Thrash is anything more than a special team guy. I certainly would want him as a back up slot guy and on teams, but your team is in trouble if he was one of your starting pair.[/quote]

He dd as good as any as the Redskins have had. Made the QB look pretty good a few times as well. Trolling my azz.

Re: NFL News Offseason Style
 

[IMG]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.mandatory.com/media/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-5.25.32-pm.png?9651[/IMG]


I guess we can add......"troll a football forum" ....to this list.