Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=mredskins;665630]Where did you copy this from?[/quote]

I didnt copy it man i wrote it. Ive prolly been puttin in as much time as Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan this offseason but i dont get paid lol sad insight to my life.

-Haz

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=PHazard;665734]I didnt copy it man i wrote it. Ive prolly been puttin in as much time as Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan this offseason but i dont get paid lol sad insight to my life.

-Haz[/quote]


Just interesting how your grammar and level of vocabulary became so good for one post, now it looks like from this post you are back to your old tricks. Just interesting.

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=mredskins;665756]Just interesting how your grammar and level of vocabulary became so good for one post, now it looks like from this post you are back to your old tricks. Just interesting.[/quote]
it's more likely to start typing closer to properly when putting together a substantial post

there were still plenty of "gimmie" "alot" "ill (instead of I'll)"

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=tryfuhl;665760]it's more likely to start typing closer to properly when putting together a substantial post

there were still plenty of "gimmie" "alot" "ill (instead of I'll)"[/quote]


Regardless anyone who lumps Ryan Leaf into the same talent pool or "[I]IT[/I]" factor if you will with Phillip Rivers, sure is a football guru.

[I]Eyes rolling...[/I]

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

Last time I checked, this was a football forum and not an english class. Are you so bored with this forum that you must post about others spelling instead of football? I never claimed to be a guru. Sure, you can look at Ryan Leaf now and say "wow, he sucked." But at the time he came out in the draft, they said he had an IT factor. They said he had an attitude but was more NFL ready than Manning. That's why there was a controversy about who would be the 1st overall pick. So don't act all "haha he doesn't know anything about football because he is comparing Ryan Leaf to Phillip River hahaha." It was an observation.

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=PHazard;665922]Last time I checked, this was a football forum and not an english class. Are you so bored with this forum that you must post about others spelling instead of football? I never claimed to be a guru. Sure, you can look at Ryan Leaf now and say "wow, he sucked." But at the time he came out in the draft, they said he had an IT factor. They said he had an attitude but was more NFL ready than Manning. That's why there was a controversy about who would be the 1st overall pick. So don't act all "haha he doesn't know anything about football because he is comparing Ryan Leaf to Phillip River hahaha." It was an observation.[/quote]

I agree with you man. I guess it's cool to pick on the freshmen in the post.

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=mredskins;665790]Regardless anyone who lumps Ryan Leaf into the same talent pool or "[I]IT[/I]" factor if you will with Phillip Rivers, sure is a football guru.

[I]Eyes rolling...[/I][/quote]Did you miss his point or something?

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

I think he went well out of his way to miss the point.

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=PHazard;665922]Last time I checked, this was a football forum and not an english class. Are you so bored with this forum that you must post about others spelling instead of football? I never claimed to be a guru. Sure, you can look at Ryan Leaf now and say "wow, he sucked." [B]But at the time he came out in the draft, they said he had an IT factor. They said he had an attitude but was more NFL ready than Manning[/B]. That's why there was a controversy about who would be the 1st overall pick. So don't act all "haha he doesn't know anything about football because he is comparing Ryan Leaf to Phillip River hahaha." It was an observation.[/quote]

Good point man. The bolded part sounds like Clausen and Bradford if you think about it.

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=PHazard;665922]Last time I checked, this was a football forum and not an english class. Are you so bored with this forum that you must post about others spelling instead of football? I never claimed to be a guru. Sure, you can look at Ryan Leaf now and say "wow, he sucked." But at the time he came out in the draft, they said he had an IT factor. They said he had an attitude but was more NFL ready than Manning. That's why there was a controversy about who would be the 1st overall pick. So don't act all "haha he doesn't know anything about football because he is comparing Ryan Leaf to Phillip River hahaha." It was an observation.[/quote]


Not bored at all! If I was I would not come here nearly everyday. The point I am trying to make is that sometimes your grammar/spelling on here is so bad it is not legable. I will be the first to raise my hand and say my grammar is pretty bad on here at times as well just take sometime to proof your post it will go along way in helping others understand what you are trying to convey.

I now understand where you are coming from with Leaf comparsion. MAkes sense sorry for the cofusing and challenging your football knowledge

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=mredskins;666057]Not bored at all! If I was I would not come here nearly everyday. The point I am trying to make is that sometimes your grammar/spelling on here is so bad it is not [B]legable[/B]. I will be the first to raise my hand and say my grammar is [B] pretty bad on here [U]at times as well just[/U] take [U]sometime[/U] to proof your[U] post it will[/U] go along [/B]way in helping others understand what you are trying to convey.

I now understand where you are coming from with Leaf comparsion.[B] MAkes sense[/B] sorry for the [B]cofusing[/B] and challenging your football knowledge[/quote]
ok, how can we not pick at this post!

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;666063]ok, how can we not pick at this post![/quote]


Did I not say I was the first to raise my hand about poor grammar?

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=mredskins;666065]Did I not say I was the first to raise my hand about poor grammar?[/quote]

I can't say that I saw a raised hand, but yes you acknowledged it. However, when you are writing a reflective post about proofing what you write, it does seem a tad odd to have that many spelling and grammar mistakes bundled tightly together.

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;666067]I can't say that I saw a raised hand, but yes you acknowledged it. However, when you are writing a reflective post about proofing what you write, it does seem a tad odd to have that many spelling and grammar mistakes bundled tightly together.[/quote]


True I rushed it and typed it out of Firefox, no spell check. I am sorry to you also CRedskinsRule, I live just up the road from Pasadena would you like me to bring you a blood offering as a apology as well?

Re: Bradford/Clausen now split among Mock Drafts
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;666067][B]I can't say that I saw a raised hand[/B], but yes you acknowledged it. However, when you are writing a reflective post about proofing what you write, it does seem a tad odd to have that many spelling and grammar mistakes bundled tightly together.[/quote]


You even proofed it!


I will be the first to raise my hand and say my grammar is [B] pretty bad on here [U]at times as well just[/U] take [U]sometime[/U] to proof your[U] post it will[/U] go along [/B]way in helping others understand what you are trying to convey.