![]() |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=firstdown;945736]If you noticed I corrected my post by saying these women probably com in first for STD's and birth control before they come back for an abortion.[/quote]Cool. :food-smil
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=firstdown;945736]If you noticed I corrected my post by saying these women probably com in first for STD's and birth control before they come back for an abortion.[/quote]
wow, ...hell of an assumption,anything to back it up? |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;945719]Is Romney still running for President?[/quote]
...I guess ,he's going to hold a fund rasier in Hong Kong. [url=http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-politics/20120926/US.Romney.China.Fundraiser./]Romney fundraiser planned Thursday in Hong Kong | Political Headlines | Comcast[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Today, BLS preliminary estimate of the benchmark revision indicates an upward adjustment to March 2012 of 386,000 more jobs than originally expected.
Meaning President Obama is now a net job creator since taking office in Jan. '09. Also puts private sector growth at 5.1 million jobs over the past 30 months. Long ways to go, but this somewhat explains the gradual down tick in the unemployment number. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
I don't think it can be emphasized enough that over 4 million jobs were lost in Obama's first year in office. A good chunk before the stimulus bill ever reached his desk.
[url=http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/27/news/economy/obama-job-creation/index.html]New data shows Obama may be a job creator, after all - Sep. 27, 2012[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
12th, quit distorting this thread with fact.... its so useless:)
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
I am sure there have been more incompetent candidates and campaigns but the Romney and co have got to be up there. This election is just about over and if we were having an after party a cooked goose by name of Mitt would be for dinner.
[YT]Sv8wu6X5jK8[/YT] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;945953]Today, BLS preliminary estimate of the benchmark revision indicates an upward adjustment to March 2012 of 386,000 more jobs than originally expected.
Meaning President [B]Obama is now a net job creator[/B] since taking office in Jan. '09. Also puts private sector growth at 5.1 million jobs over the past 30 months. Long ways to go, but this somewhat explains the gradual down tick in the unemployment number.[/quote]Impressive....rolls eyes. Still the worst record of any POTUS. Bush 2 and Reagan were dealt bad economic hands by the previous POTUS yet their job gains outpaced Obamas. W created 5M jobs in the first 30 months of recovery, Reagan created 8M. So Obama will have the worst job record of any POTUS and also a Household income drop of 4.8% during the "recovery". For folks 25-34 the income drop is 8.9%, for African Americans....11%. Sure don't want to distort the thread with any facts, sorry about that. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;945960]Impressive....rolls eyes. Still the worst record of any POTUS.
Bush 2 and Reagan were dealt bad economic hands by the previous POTUS yet their job gains outpaced Obamas. W created 5M jobs in the first 30 months of recovery, Reagan created 8M. So Obama will have the worst job record of any POTUS and also a Household income drop of 4.8% during the "recovery". For folks 25-34 the income drop is 8.9%, for African Americans....11%. Sure don't want to distort the thread with any facts, sorry about that.[/quote] I'll bet money that after 8 years in office, Obama will easily surpass wherever Bush ended. And how can you can you compare this recession with any recession since WWII? It was far deeper and more destructive than either Reagan's or Bush's. #applesandoranges Did either Reagan or Bush lose 750K jobs their first month in office? Before one bill was passed? |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=firstdown;945740]Its because you have no way of seperating the funds so federal money does go toward abortions. TX tried to correct this problem.[/quote]
I deal with federal monies fairly regularly at work. I can tell you this, we're very strict about what is appropriated for X may NOT be used for Y. I'm not working on anything near as controversial as that -- but money is put in seperate pools that cannot be touched by other processes. Fairly strict record keeping behind all of those accounts. I don't have any direct knowledge of this particular situation, but there are ways of seperating funds established and enforced in other areas. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
While we're debunking myths and spins, President Obama is preferred by Catholics over Mitt Romney.
[url=http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/27/pew-poll-obama-opens-up-lead-over-romney-among-catholics/?hpt=hp_t2]Pew poll: Obama opens up lead over Romney among Catholics – CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
More apples to apples comparison. Obama vs. Bush.
“The Bush record on employment through both terms is poor with net job losses, while under Obama, even though the recovery is helping, there remains a net job loss in the sector.” [url=http://m.futuresmag.com/2012/09/06/obama-vs-bush-on-job-creation]Futures[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
And the ever-important Nascar demographic prefers Obama.... that's a shock.
[url=http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-romney-nascar-poll-140401668--politics.html]Obama leads Romney among NASCAR fans: Poll | The Ticket - Yahoo! News[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;945967]While we're debunking myths and spins, President Obama is preferred by Catholics over Mitt Romney.
[URL="http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/27/pew-poll-obama-opens-up-lead-over-romney-among-catholics/?hpt=hp_t2"]Pew poll: Obama opens up lead over Romney among Catholics – CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs[/URL][/quote]Please keep believing that, Obama should just pull any funds or outreach to Catholics, he's got that vote locked. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;945962]I'll bet money that after 8 years in office, Obama will easily surpass wherever Bush ended.
And how can you can you compare this recession with any recession since WWII? It was far deeper and more destructive than either Reagan's or Bush's. #applesandoranges Did either Reagan or Bush lose 750K jobs their first month in office? Before one bill was passed?[/quote]Let's just compare the Household Income decline during the Bush recession = 2.6%. During the Obama "recovery"...down 4.8%. The Obama "recovery" is worse than the Bush recession. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
SS3, PAY ME...redistribute your wealth already!
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=saden1;946019]SS3, PAY ME...redistribute your wealth already![/quote]I lol'd....good one.
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;945976]Please keep believing that, Obama should just pull any funds or outreach to Catholics, he's got that vote locked.[/quote]
...denial ,it just ain't a river in Eygpt anymore. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Where are all the folks that clamored over Bush and the Patriot Act being an abusive invasion of privacy?
[URL="http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/new-justice-department-documents-show-huge-increase"]New Justice Department Documents Show Huge Increase in Warrantless Electronic Surveillance[/URL] So under the Obama Admin, surveillance of Americans has increased 60% overall and 361% on E-mail & network traffic. While also issuing the NDRP under Executive Order allowing the federal gov't to control all food, water, energy, health resources, transportation and all other materials, services and facilities under "emergency or non-emergency" conditions. And you folks on the left are OK and don't see any problems with all this? And of course once re-elected Obama certainly wouldn't push more drastic expansions of state power? |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Free phones from Obama!
Classy lady. [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tpAOwJvTOio]Obama Voter Says Vote for Obama because he gives a free Phone - YouTube[/url] Apparently this is quite real. Thats some serious govt tit sucking. [url=http://washingtonexaminer.com/where-do-obama-phones-come-from/article/2509203]Where do “Obama phones” come from? | WashingtonExaminer.com[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[url=http://news.yahoo.com/romney-camp-downplays-debate-expectations-012331687--abc-news-politics.html]Romney Camp Downplays Debate Expectations - Yahoo! News[/url]
People who have run Romney campaign are garbage. I dont understand why they do this, makes Mitt look weak. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Chico23231;946204][URL="http://news.yahoo.com/romney-camp-downplays-debate-expectations-012331687--abc-news-politics.html"]Romney Camp Downplays Debate Expectations - Yahoo! News[/URL]
People who have run Romney campaign are garbage. I dont understand why they do this, makes Mitt look weak.[/quote] lol...don't fool yourself,Mitt" IS" weak |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[YT]ekQSpbwKkdg[/YT]
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
More support for Obama:
[url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/01/venezuela-chavez-says-would-vote-for-obama-if-american/#ixzz28294nVwe]Venezuela's Chavez says he would vote for Obama if American | Fox News[/url] [url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303753904577454281416747936.html]O'Grady: Castro Endorses Obama - WSJ.com[/url] [url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/obamas_communist_party_endorsement.html]Articles: Obama's Communist Party Endorsement[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Yay communism.
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Chico23231;946204][URL="http://news.yahoo.com/romney-camp-downplays-debate-expectations-012331687--abc-news-politics.html"]Romney Camp Downplays Debate Expectations - Yahoo! News[/URL]
People who have run Romney campaign are garbage. I dont understand why they do this, makes Mitt look weak.[/quote] Looks to me like the author of the article jumped to those conclusions to make you think as you have. The only thing I read said Obama has more experience in Presidetial debates (true) and that Obama will use the debate to attack Romney because he cannot run on his recordm (also True). You actually did a good job finding bias media coverage after all it is Yahoo news. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;947660]More support for Obama:
[URL="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/01/venezuela-chavez-says-would-vote-for-obama-if-american/#ixzz28294nVwe"]Venezuela's Chavez says he would vote for Obama if American | Fox News[/URL] [URL="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303753904577454281416747936.html"]O'Grady: Castro Endorses Obama - WSJ.com[/URL] [URL="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/obamas_communist_party_endorsement.html"]Articles: Obama's Communist Party Endorsement[/URL][/quote] ...and China loves Romney,Sammy ya need to stop |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
can't wait for this debate weds night, i'll have to listen to it on the way home from work and watch the rest when i get there.
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Giantone;947709]...and China loves Romney,Sammy ya need to stop[/quote]
Im curious as to where you got that info. China has been a major supporter of the democrats for a long time. One of the largest monetary supporters. No way does China want Unions to be slowed down, they keep sending jobs to China. Remember the whole campaign donation reform that was tried a while back. Dems accused republicans of trying to undermine it. They didnt undermine it, they wanted the same restriction on American corporations the dems wanted to be placed on foreign countries. The dems laughed at that. Why? China donated way to much to them for that to be included. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Skinzman;947974]Im curious as to where you got that info. China has been a major supporter of the democrats for a long time. One of the largest monetary supporters..[/quote]
It was sarcasm ,Romney's Bain years he sent a job or two over there.And while I know both sides have interest in China the Republicans(not the Dems) seem to have more,read it and weep. [url=http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2012/president/candidates/romney/2012/09/26/romney-fundraiser-planned-thursday-hong-kong/wTN4xGIK9s1GRONrIGOWVN/story.html]Romney fundraiser planned Thursday in Hong Kong - News - Boston.com[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=Giantone;948046]It was sarcasm ,Romney's Bain years he sent a job or two over there.And while I know both sides have interest in China the Republicans(not the Dems) seem to have more,read it and weep.
[URL="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2012/president/candidates/romney/2012/09/26/romney-fundraiser-planned-thursday-hong-kong/wTN4xGIK9s1GRONrIGOWVN/story.html"]Romney fundraiser planned Thursday in Hong Kong - News - Boston.com[/URL][/quote]You may want to read your own link, nothing in it shows Chinese support for Romney. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
BREAKING: Per AP, Judge halts PA voter ID law.
Good. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;948110]BREAKING: Per AP, Judge halts PA voter ID law.
Good.[/quote] The only reason you think its good is because you know your party is supported by the dumb and lazy. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=firstdown;948186]The only reason you think its good is because you know your party is supported by the dumb and lazy.[/quote]
Glad you and Mitt are on the same page...when you lot get trounced in the election it will be by "dumb" and "lazy" people smart and motivated enough to vote. The days of winning with the Angry White Male Voter is over...the sooner the GOP dumps you numbnuts the better their electoral prospect will be. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;948110]BREAKING: Per AP, Judge halts PA voter ID law.
Good.[/quote]The judge only struck the implementation for this election due to time constraints before Nov. 6th, not the entire law. Fair compromise. I don't see this having an effect on this election, even Rasmussen has Obama up by double digits in PA as of 9/21. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Those damn Republicans, paying off defense contractors.....ooops....did I read that right, it's the Obama Admin playing politics with federal funding for defense!
[url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/02/republicans-rip-white-house-for-putting-tax-dollars-on-line-over-possible/]Republicans rip White House for putting tax dollars on line over possible defense layoffs | Fox News[/url] |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=firstdown;948186]The only reason you think its good is because you know your party is supported by the dumb and lazy.[/quote]
Mitt, is that you? |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=saden1;948194]Glad you and Mitt are on the same page...when you lot get trounced in the election it will be by "dumb" and "lazy" people smart and motivated enough to vote.
The days of winning with the Angry White Male Voter is over...the sooner the GOP dumps you numbnuts the better their electoral prospect will be.[/quote] Atleast I have nuts. |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=12thMan;948208]Mitt, is that you?[/quote]
Please explain who else would not have an ID or any of the other 20 forms of ID's allowed? |
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
[quote=firstdown;948212]Atleast I have nuts.[/quote]
Having nuts is not enough, you have to have bolts too...without bolts it's very difficult for the gears in your head to turn. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.