Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Draft talk rounds 4-7 (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=52668)

FRPLG 04-27-2013 06:49 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
The deal with the rbs is this...shanny drafted them. That means they can play rb in the NFL.

GusFrerotte 04-27-2013 06:50 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=RGIII;1006598]Any one running behind this line (especially with RG3) is gonna have success.[/quote]

True, but if you have proven talent, why discard it? Jamison looks rather versatile though. He could be our version of Jamie Morris or Darren Sproles. Hopefully our moves with the line will help keep our line tops!

CRedskinsRule 04-27-2013 06:50 PM

[QUOTE=Giantone;1006603]LOL, yeah right , you think and INT is going to bother Eli, really?[/QUOTE]

No I hope he is unfazed by them and continues to throw them without worrying about it.

MTK 04-27-2013 06:50 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=GusFrerotte;1006596]Helu is a question mark because of the injury, but Royster I thought gave us decent production for being a #3. And if you did want a potential young replacement, why draft a kid that is oft injured? [B]I don't know anything about Jameson to really say anything at this point.[/B] Big East ball doesn't get much play here in MI.[/quote]

Royster didn't do much at all last year IMO.

People were saying the same thing last year with Morris.

GusFrerotte 04-27-2013 06:51 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=FRPLG;1006607]The deal with the rbs is this...shanny drafted them. That means they can play rb in the NFL.[/quote]
Not questioning the actual picks. Is our backfield that suspect that we needed 2 RBs though? That is the heart of the debate.

FRPLG 04-27-2013 06:52 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=GTripp0012;1006606]Brandon Jenkins and Jawan Jamison were two of my favorite players in this draft.[/quote]

I really like the reed pick for us specifically. He'll be a nice target for kirk/bob and part of a matchup nightmare scheme.

MTK 04-27-2013 06:52 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=GusFrerotte;1006611]Not questioning the actual picks. Is our backfield that suspect that we needed 2 RBs though? That is the heart of the debate.[/quote]

Helu hasn't been able to stay healthy and what has Royster done to cement a spot?

I'm all for bringing in more playmakers.

FRPLG 04-27-2013 06:53 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=GusFrerotte;1006611]Not questioning the actual picks. Is our backfield that suspect that we needed 2 RBs though? That is the heart of the debate.[/quote]

Value picks at that point. They'll play teams if they make the team. Plus really royster was ehhh last year and helu can't be counted on.

FRPLG 04-27-2013 06:54 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=Mattyk;1006613]Helu hasn't been able to stay healthy and what has Royster done to cement a spot?

I'm all for bringing in more playmakers.[/quote]

Right

GusFrerotte 04-27-2013 06:55 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=Mattyk;1006610]Royster didn't do much at all last year IMO.

People were saying the same thing last year with Morris.[/quote]


I thought he did decent enough for us as a backup. The RB picks aren't bad, but like RGIII stated, you could put anybody behind our starting line and they will be good. Just like Shanny in Denver.

FRPLG 04-27-2013 06:56 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
What I like a lot is that we really didn't reach anywhere.

FRPLG 04-27-2013 06:59 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=GusFrerotte;1006616]I thought he did decent enough for us as a backup. The RB picks aren't bad, but like RGIII stated, you could put anybody behind our starting line and they will be good. Just like Shanny in Denver.[/quote]

The right anybodies. Both guys have skillsets that match the zbs and do something good like catch the ball (Thompson) and pass protect (Jamison)

That Guy 04-27-2013 07:02 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
i'm happy with day 3. if shanny drafts an RB... I approve. that's it. doesn't matter if i don't know them or no one's heard about them, he's proved he's the smartest guy in the world in regards to late round RBs.

and behind morris we got nothing. we'd have helu, if he could stay healthy.

really happy with day 3. rambo in the 6th is good value, and 3 DBs that could potentially start this year is great. I really think our FO did a great job of addressing our needs this offseason. future TE/TE #2 and RB #2 are important for flexibility and i think pashos and the 4 new DBs should really help us with our pass D.

Glasgow Celtic 04-27-2013 07:10 PM

[QUOTE=Mattyk;1006613]Helu hasn't been able to stay healthy and what has Royster done to cement a spot?

I'm all for bringing in more playmakers.[/QUOTE]

What this guy says, Oh and if Shanny picks a rb then count me in on default

GTripp0012 04-27-2013 07:20 PM

Re: Draft talk rounds 4-7
 
[quote=FRPLG;1006612]I really like the reed pick for us specifically. He'll be a nice target for kirk/bob and part of a matchup nightmare scheme.[/quote]Reed I think fits more what we want to be than what we are.

I think that consistent with what we've done over the last few years, the Redskins have given draft value early, and gotten it late, if that makes sense. I think the Redskins are just typically very picky with who they get early in the draft, but later in the draft, they open it up a lot and typically get a lot of value.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.31612 seconds with 9 queries