Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

backrow might have the fail of the year with his take on Cam from that first link

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Mattyk;882192]backrow might have the fail of the year with his take on Cam from that first link[/quote]

Same page CultBren post "Dalton is a fourth round at best", and then starts a thread today telling us why our QB situation will suck again this year

[QUOTE=British Andy;882181]Over in Warwickshire. Still waiting for the Skins to come to Wembley before i one day get to DC....[/QUOTE]

Me too mate,DC is only a dream though :(

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;882186]PFT??? Really??[/quote]

I'm sorry to let you down. How is this write up any better?

[url=http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/37438/andy-dalton-and-his-draft-status]Andy Dalton and his draft status - College Football Nation Blog - ESPN[/url]

[quote]On Dalton: McShay has concerns about his size (6-foot-1) and ability to throw consistently in the "intermediate and vertical" areas of the field. But, he believes Dalton is worthy of a third or fourth-round pick because he could be brought along on the cheap and turned into a solid backup or even an adequate starter.[/quote]

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Chico23231;882193]Same page CultBren post "Dalton is a fourth round at best", and then starts a thread today telling us why our QB situation will suck again this year[/quote]

We have a lot of geniuses around here, including myself who related Cam to Vince Young.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Mattyk;882196]We have a lot of geniuses around here, including myself who related Cam to Vince Young.[/quote]

Yeah I think i said something along the same lines about how I wouldnt waste a first round pick on any of them including Cam. I underestimated Cam could beast mode running the ball in the NFL the way he did.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

Still wish we could have gotten Locker last year. Oh well.

I'll be totally surprised if we sign Flynn. Only mildly, if that, if we get Peyton.

Still don't think we're spending the #6 on a QB

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882252]Still wish we could have gotten Locker last year. Oh well.

I'll be totally surprised if we sign Flynn. Only mildly, if that, if we get Peyton.

Still don't think we're spending the #6 on a QB[/quote]

You've mentioned Tackle if not QB...any names you've heard? Heard Mike Adams had a monster senior bowl week. I wouldnt mind another trade out at 6th if the Claibourne or Blackmon are gone already

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

Reiff and Martin mainly.

If we don't get a QB or WR in the first I'd be dissapointed

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882252]Still wish we could have gotten Locker last year. Oh well.

I'll be totally surprised if we sign Flynn. Only mildly, if that, if we get Peyton.

Still don't think we're spending the #6 on a QB[/quote]

Sure is a lot of this outside our local media:

@howardeskin
Howard Eskin
Told by 2 people close to Mannings that Peyton very likely to be a Redskin despite smokescreen being put of their by Skins to seek other QBs

and expanded by NFP here:

[url=http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Peyton-Manning-to-the-Redskins-Eskin-says-very-likely.html]Peyton Manning to the Redskins? Eskin says 'very likely' | National Football Post[/url]

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882252]Still wish we could have gotten Locker last year. Oh well.

I'll be totally surprised if we sign Flynn. Only mildly, if that, if we get Peyton.

Still don't think we're spending the #6 on a QB[/quote]

What about the number 2 or 3?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

I don't trust Eskin as far as I can throw him.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882273]I don't trust Eskin as far as I can throw him.[/quote]

I don't know him but thought it was interesting that the NFP picked it up.

Also thought this was interesting:

Peyton Manning Willing to Work "Flexible" Contract

The Phinsider — According to an Adam Schefter report, sources close to Peyton Manning are saying, if the Indianapolis Colts were to release him, he would be willing to work a "flexible" contract with his new team. Basically, Manning would work a deal that would guarantee little money, with most of the salary in either roster bonuses, or on the field performance incentives. This could alleviate a lot of the health concerns teams may have for Manning, and make it easier to sign the leagues only 4-time MVP.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Higskin;882276]I don't know him but thought it was interesting that the NFP picked it up.

Also thought this was interesting:

Peyton Manning Willing to Work "Flexible" Contract

The Phinsider — According to an Adam Schefter report, sources close to Peyton Manning are saying, if the Indianapolis Colts were to release him, he would be willing to work a "flexible" contract with his new team. Basically, Manning would work a deal that would guarantee little money, with most of the salary in either roster bonuses, or on the field performance incentives. This could alleviate a lot of the health concerns teams may have for Manning, and make it easier to sign the leagues only 4-time MVP.[/quote]

I'm not saying Eskin is wrong. Just need to hear it from more people. The buzz on Manning has been so hard to keep up with. Again, me personally I'd sign him if healthy.

Heard about the flexible contract. Also have heard post career ownership is another option

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;882267]What about the number 2 or 3?[/quote]

As in, will we trade up? Hear we're trying but I don't see it. Either trading down in 1st or moving up in 2nd is how I see it. I'm guessing Tannehill or Foles is their draft pick, along with a veteran they acquire via trade or free agency.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882289]I'm not saying Eskin is wrong. Just need to hear it from more people. The buzz on Manning has been so hard to keep up with. Again, me personally I'd sign him if healthy.

Heard about the flexible contract. Also have heard post career ownership is another option[/quote]

How much of a stake are we talking?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882315]As in, will we trade up? Hear we're trying but I don't see it. Either trading down in 1st or moving up in 2nd is how I see it. I'm guessing Tannehill or Foles is their draft pick, along with a veteran they acquire via trade or free agency.[/quote]

Do you want me to cry? Is that what you want? Do you want to see me cry?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=tryfuhl;882357]How much of a stake are we talking?[/quote]

No idea.

I think it would be foolish not to consider Manning if he's healthy

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;882379]Do you want me to cry? Is that what you want? Do you want to see me cry?[/quote]

Actually yes, I do. I think for Luck they'll make an offer to move up. I'm not so sure if they'll do the same for RG3.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882381]No idea.

I think it would be foolish not to consider Manning if he's healthy[/quote]

Agreed, anyone who has a need at QB is going to be gunning for him. A player of his caliber hitting the open market is just crazy.

Alright, the super bowls been over for an hour now. How come we haven't signed Peyton Manning yet?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882383]Actually yes, I do. I think for Luck they'll make an offer to move up. I'm not so sure if they'll do the same for RG3.[/quote]

I think he'll fall to 6 anyway but we would take him if he fell there right?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=WilbursHomie;882398]Alright, the super bowls been over for an hour now. How come we haven't signed Peyton Manning yet?[/quote]

Is this a serious question? I'm pretty confident it's a joke but even if it is I don't really see the hilarity.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;882400]I think he'll fall to 6 anyway but we would take him if he fell there right?[/quote]

I think the team that may take him is Miami (if they don't do anything else at the QB position before then). They'd have to trade up for him of course. I'm not totally sure any of the teams in the top 5 would draft him. Even if the Browns decide that Colt isn't the answer, I'm not totally sure they think RG3 is.

So anyway, if RG3 is there at #6 for us I would suspect we take him. But I'm not yet 100% sure we will. I have to find out a bit more about how they feel about guys like Tannehill and Foles. I don't think even the team totally knows yet.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

So it comes down to Ryan "Clark Kent" Tannehill and Nick "Saban" Foles. I'd prefer RGIII but in all honesty I just want this guy to be good . I'm tired of rolling out garbage every week just to be watching a division rival hoist another SB trophy.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;882426]So it comes down to Ryan "Clark Kent" Tannehill and Nick "Saban" Foles. I'd prefer RGIII but in all honesty I just want this guy to be good . I'm tired of rolling out garbage every week just to be watching a division rival hoist another SB trophy.[/quote]

Just two names I put out there as examples. Certainly Cousins and Weeden will be considered too.

I'm 99.9999% positive we are adding 2, if not 3, new QBs this off-season.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;882426]So it comes down to Ryan "Clark Kent" Tannehill and Nick "Saban" Foles. I'd prefer RGIII but in all honesty I just want this guy to be good . I'm tired of rolling out garbage every week just to be watching a division rival hoist another SB trophy.[/quote]

I know you don't see the same guy that I do but I think Tannehill is going to be very good.

And I was completely wrong about Cam Newton so I am a QB expert.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882289]Also have heard post career ownership is another option[/quote]

You still have to figure out how to fit that under the cap or the league would come down on us like a ton of bricks if we tried to skirt it with something like that.

I think all the talk about Peyton taking little guarteed money all goes out the window once teams start throwing offers at him.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Lotus;882434]I know you don't see the same guy that I do but I think Tannehill is going to be very good.

And I was completely wrong about Cam Newton so I am a QB expert.[/quote]

I believe Cousins and Tannehill are very highly regarded by the Skins. But I know they were very disappointed that RT couldn't participate in the Senior Bowl

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Lotus;882434]I know you don't see the same guy that I do but I think Tannehill is going to be very good.

And I was completely wrong about Cam Newton so I am a QB expert.[/quote]

I think Tannehill could be pretty good but I just hava feeling RGIII and Luck will be top 5 QBs of the next generation.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

"Captain" Kirk Cousins. Winning.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Chico23231;882193]Same page CultBren post [B]"Dalton is a fourth round at best"[/B], and then starts a thread today telling us why our QB situation will suck again this year[/quote]

I said that? must have been last year.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=SmootSmack;882415]So anyway, if RG3 is there at #6 for us I would suspect we take him. But I'm not yet 100% sure we will. I have to find out a bit more about how they feel about guys like Tannehill and Foles. I don't think even the team totally knows yet.[/quote]That's an interesting theory that their decision on drafting Griffin if available at 6 would hinge upon their evaluation of Tannehill or Cousins.

I'm inclined to think that taking Griffin if available at 6 would be a no brainer, and that they would run to the podium smiling at their good fortune.

Imo this regime is not in any position to get cute in the draft when it comes to QB; and passing on Griffin if available at 6 would being trying to get cute.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

Thing about drafting Tannehill. Automatic trick play threat.....or at least half of a trick play. Not sure we have any running backs or receivers that can throw.
[YT]gJtZYKIzzZE[/YT]

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

Let's say if Shannahan drafts a rookie QB and get Orton. Let's say we have another losing season do you think he gets fired? Also, I know you don't like this but when does Daniel Snyder step in you think. I mean if this year is like this past season and we have the qb mess. Wouln't you wanna step in? I think Snyder has been patient, but Bruce Allen/Mike Shannahan are running out time. Thoughts?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=skinsecity;882469]Let's say if Shannahan drafts a rookie QB and get Orton. Let's say we have another losing season do you think he gets fired? Also, I know you don't like this but when does Daniel Snyder step in you think. I mean if this year is like this past season and we have the qb mess. Wouln't you wanna step in? I think Snyder has been patient, but Bruce Allen/Mike Shannahan are running out time. Thoughts?[/quote]

I feel it may depend on how they play. If we play the same way we played last season, I can see why MS would be fired. But if we have a Panthers' type of a season, then maybe Snyder gives him another year.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

If we wind up with Peyton, is it crazy that I'd consider Richardson at #6?

Just those two alone would be such a tremendous boost to our offense.

We'd actually, you know, keep some opposing coaches up at night don't you think?

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=NYCskinfan82;881931]Fisher might look at RGIII like McNair they are/were both mobile/accurate/leaders.[/quote]

Sounds feasible at first...but then you remember McNair was a tough ass dude, like the QB version of Ray Lewis. RGIII won't be the same type of mobile QB. On the scramble to pass spectrum, RGIII will be as far to the "pass" end as Vick is to the "scramble" end.

RGIII may well be the most exciting player in this year's draft, but I bet he's not among the top three QB's from this draft five years from now.

Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
 

[quote=Mechanix544;879598]The more time goes along, the more I think that we are going to get Manning. Sign Peyton Manning, draft the best O Lineman in the first, Foles in the second, and throw a bunch of money at Vincent Jackson and Dwayne Bowe, and the best corner we can afford.

Manning teaching Foles, without the threat of a Luck behind him, tossing it to VJax and Hankerson, and Fred Davis, and dont forget Gaffney, as well as a great pass catching RB in Helu. Dont forget that Peyton Manning will make everyone on the Offense, EVERYONE, look alot better, including our line and receivers. We keep our pass rushing talent, peyton gets a much better defense than he ever had in indy, and we strengthen some pieces this offseason, making our offense much more polished and talented in the process. Oh, and we have our QB of the future in Foles.........

I definitely would not hate it if the Redskins get a Peyton Manning here, still in his mid thirties, with a chip on his shoulder. Mike Shanahan could not lose with this plan, he is instantly turning the squad into a contender, while still preserving our future in Foles, a very talented capable young QB.

Sign my ass up, I think I just talked myself into wanting peyton manning on our team.[/quote]

That's good stuff 544!! I dig the optimism! Still can't understand why Peyton would want to come her, but maybe this is BA's off-season to shine???