![]() |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[quote=scowan;1075314][URL="http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/blogger-hired-to-defend-redskins-name-resigns/2014/07/08/133f721e-06b3-11e4-9a71-264773a2ffc8_story.html"]Blogger hired to defend Redskins name resigns - The Washington Post[/URL]
I love the sentence in this article that says, "Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed not to change the name but is facing unprecedented opposition from those who consider it a racial slur." What it should have said is that Snyder is facing unprececedented opposition from the "smallest of minorities of people in the country" who consider it a racial slur. But "unprececedented opposition" sounds more powerful. The propaganda on this just continues to be amazing to me.[/quote] i would consider that letter signed by a bunch of US Senators to be fairly significant and unprecedented. throw in the tv ad during the nba finals ..... the federal court cancelling the redskins trademark on a finding that it is derogatory is kinda a big deal to imo maybe im just nitpicking or having a selective memory .. but i dont think that one sentence from the journalist was unsupported or unfounded. ps - i just dont give a sh%t about this issue anymore. if it changes - fine. if it doesnt - even better. i do find myself annoyed at anyone beating the war drum at either end of the spectrum. just an exercise in futility. |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[quote=over the mountain;1075318]i would consider that letter signed by a bunch of US Senators to be fairly significant and unprecedented.
throw in the tv ad during the nba finals ..... the federal court cancelling the redskins trademark on a finding that it is derogatory is kinda a big deal to imo maybe im just nitpicking or having a selective memory .. but i dont think that one sentence from the journalist was unsupported or unfounded. ps - i just dont give a sh%t about this issue anymore. if it changes - fine. if it doesnt - even better. i do find myself annoyed at anyone beating the war drum at either end of the spectrum. just an exercise in futility.[/quote] Ok, a bunch of Senators (maybe 40-45?) who honestly should have nothing to do with this issue, a Federal court cancels the trademark after never receiving one complaint to their office (as per a recent Washington Times article), a TV ad, and a hundred maybe a few thousand media types, VERSES the hundreds of thousands of people that say don't change the name. I don't really find that unprecedented. I find it just amazing how such a small minority of people can continue to make this news worthy. |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
To be clear, a court did not cancel the trademark. The Patent & Trademark Office did. The PTO's decision will be challenged in court where it lost on this issue previously. The PTO is part of the executive branch, not the judicial.
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[quote=JoeRedskin;1075320]To be clear, a court did not cancel the trademark. The Patent & Trademark Office did. The PTO's decision will be challenged in court where it lost on this issue previously. The PTO is part of the executive branch, not the judicial.[/quote]
Exactly! The federal court, more than likely, will be the one to overturn the ruling, yet again. |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Here how about this
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_Whites]Fighting Whites - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] I think it would work lol :lol: |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
The Washington Skins
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Washington [URL="http://www.lingo2word.com/lingodetail.php?WrdID=18237"]Ningens[/URL]
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[quote=Dirtbag59;1075367]Washington [URL="http://www.lingo2word.com/lingodetail.php?WrdID=18237"]Ningens[/URL][/quote]for my fellow Community fans:
[IMG]http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l1nuaxAInC1qbiueao1_400.png[/IMG] |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[url=http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/07/14/federal-judge-against-using-redskins-court]Federal judge in Maryland won't allow use of 'Redskins' in court documents - NFL - SI.com[/url]
You just can't make this up. |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[quote=SirLK26;1075575][url=http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/07/14/federal-judge-against-using-redskins-court]Federal judge in Maryland won't allow use of 'Redskins' in court documents - NFL - SI.com[/url]
You just can't make this up.[/quote] I think the funny thing (at least in my mind) is that the court document references a play in the future. "According to the Complaint, the Washington team deemed Green a "disruptive presence" in his team's prior win against the Washington Team on [B]September 19, 2014[/B]"[source page 2 starting at line 10 of the complaint] Yeah, I know it's a typo, but if you want to make a point of not using the Redskins name, at least don't make stupid typos in the factual background portion. |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
I think Washington should be forward thinking. The Washington Androids.
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
[quote=Gary84Clark;1075652]I think Washington should be forward thinking. The Washington Androids.[/quote]Only if we get a sponsorship from Samsung.
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Washington (johnny) Rockets!
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Washington Football Team
Completely neutral and not offensive. Except in seasons like the last one when one could argue if they´re really playing football. |
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Just call them Washington. Or do you have to have an actual name after that? I have to say I honestly wouldn't be upset with Braves. Could still keep the Native American imagery too, not to mention it was the original name.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.