Re: La'Roi Glover??
 

Expensive + Old + Injury Risk + Would possibly be a backup behind Big Joe > Talent (which he still has a considerable amount of IMO)

I rest my case

Re: La'Roi Glover??
 

Expensive not really at his age , he isn't a Injury Risk has played all the games in the 4 or 5 season his been with us, but won't sign to be a backup and he still can play at the top leve lthe only thing is we allready went young last year so he's the odd man out

Re: La'Roi Glover??
 

[QUOTE=Dirtbag359]Expensive + Old + Injury Risk + Would possibly be a backup behind Big Joe > Talent (which he still has a considerable amount of IMO)

I rest my case[/QUOTE]

There's no real backups according to GW. "Everyone is a starter." He just has different packages.

Re: La'Roi Glover??
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]There's no real backups according to GW. "Everyone is a starter." He just has different packages.[/QUOTE]

Nice sig TMC

Re: La'Roi Glover??
 

Thanks TAFKAS,

I do what I can...

Re: La'Roi Glover??
 

[QUOTE=D'BOYZ]Expensive not really at his age , he isn't a Injury Risk has played all the games in the 4 or 5 season his been with us, but won't sign to be a backup and he still can play at the top leve lthe only thing is we allready went young last year so he's the odd man out[/QUOTE]

Good point. Its just when I said expensive I meant it from the standpoint of how much the Redskins could to spend. When you look at the cost as a percentage of what the Skins will have available to spend then it can be called expenisve. Just like buying a Lexsus is expensive to a school teacher but not a CEO.