![]() |
Re: Another Reason to Hate Dr. Z/Like Dan Snyder
[quote=724Skinsfan]This means that Monk's other 40 catches would have had to average 138 yards. It's possible...Did Art Monk play in an era with experimental field dimensions?[/quote]
I think you need to email that one directly to the dickface himself. |
Re: Another Reason to Hate Dr. Z/Like Dan Snyder
considering that Monk at one point was the all time leader in receptions, and held several NFL Records (which thanks to Jerry Rice and others, were all but obliterated)...he should be in. I mean, Steve Largent's in, and his number are pale now compared to Monk and Rice.
those who can, do. those who can't becomes experts about it. |
Re: Another Reason to Hate Dr. Z/Like Dan Snyder
[quote=BDBohnzie]considering that Monk at one point was the all time leader in receptions, and held several NFL Records (which thanks to Jerry Rice and others, were all but obliterated)...he should be in. I mean, Steve Largent's in, and his number are pale now compared to Monk and Rice.
those who can, do. those who can't becomes experts about it.[/quote] And those who can't become experts become Dr. Z |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.