Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

Regardless, it won't be any different for Campbell. It's not like the backups are running a different system than Brunell was. He'll just have better playmakers to get the ball to.

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[QUOTE=hooskins;247536]And with a QB change, it might be even longer.[/QUOTE]

Well I mean I'm pretty excited about the change....but not [I]that[/I] excited

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=TAFKAS;247544]Well I mean I'm pretty excited about the change....but not [I]that[/I] excited[/quote]

Damn, TAFKAS! Wutsamattawichoo?

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=724Skinsfan;247551]Damn, TAFKAS! Wutsamattawichoo?[/quote]

he's lookig at the BIG picture....if campbell could play THAT well, he woulda been playing already, right? logical concern but, with Gibbs' affinity for verterans it may prove otherwise....

HTTR!

:httr: :httr: :point:

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[QUOTE=JGisLordOfTheRings;247554]he's lookig at the BIG picture....if campbell could play THAT well, he woulda been playing already, right? logical concern but, with Gibbs' affinity for verterans it may prove otherwise....

HTTR!

:httr: :httr: :point:[/QUOTE]

Actually, it was a limp attempt at some lowbrow bathroom humor. Next time I'll try harder

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=TAFKAS;247544]Well I mean I'm pretty excited about the change....but not [I]that[/I] excited[/quote]
yeah I got the joke lol....

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=TAFKAS;247561]Actually, it was a limp attempt at some lowbrow bathroom humor. Next time I'll try harder[/quote]

Yeah, my attempt to acknowledge the humor was met with some stiff resistance.

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=724Skinsfan;247569]Yeah, my attempt to acknowledge the humor was met with some stiff resistance.[/quote]

hah stiff...loll

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

More like flacid resistance.

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[QUOTE=724Skinsfan;247569]Yeah, my attempt to acknowledge the humor was met with some stiff resistance.[/QUOTE]

If someone still didn't get the joke after 4 hours I was going to talk to an admin

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;247574]More like flacid resistance.[/quote]

Not sure, you could be right. I wasn't paying THAT much attention.

EDIT: If anyone caught the original, it was not a freudian slip.

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[QUOTE=BDBohnzie;247455]It's certainly a long-term situation, setting everything up so when Gibbs steps asides, he knows he's got quality guys taking over. Same growing pains happened 2 years ago when Gibbs came back. It takes time for an offense to be implemented and click. I don't think the coaching staff thought it would take this long, and thought they had a playoff run in hand.

I wouldn't call this season a waste. It looks like Brunell could be led out to pasture after this season if Campbell does well. Saunders will get all gears going on this juggernaut. While it sucks now, long term is looking good.[/QUOTE]

The only problem with the LT plan is that Saunders is just as old as Gibbs.

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;247574]More like flacid resistance.[/quote]

hah flacid...loll

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

[quote=celts32;247580]The only problem with the LT plan is that Saunders is just as old as Gibbs.[/quote]

He looks to be in great shape (running down the field with players) so as long as he's willing to call plays then age shouldn't be an issue.

Actually this may work to our benefit. The stress of being a head-coach is obviously greater than being an OC (or a DC). Saunders may decide that head-coaching is not in his future and decide to remain an OC. Why change jobs when your current job is paying like a head coach.

Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article
 

Exactly. If I got paid the same as the director here and got to keep my current job, I'd love that shit.