Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday. (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=17487)

JoeRedskin 03-17-2007 06:53 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[QUOTE=rvd420;288760]fox is good thats why we resigned him.archy is good but didnt fit our system.i mean look how good he was in st.louis.hes just a fan hater.[/QUOTE]

why exactly is he a "fan hater"? As for not fitting our system, true but, sorry, he was never more than mediocre in st. louis. he's a linebacker in safety's body w/ the football instincts of a blind gopher.

dall-assblows 03-17-2007 07:12 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
but arch played so good last season. he was our mvp in my eyes

dmek25 03-17-2007 08:26 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[quote=rvd420;288760]fox is good thats why we resigned him.archy is good but didnt fit our system.i mean look how good he was in st.louis.hes just a fan hater.[/quote]
fox is good? good at what? he is a career journeyman, at best

JankySpanky80 03-17-2007 09:10 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
Fox does not need to be anywhere but special teams. Skins need a covering SS to mesh with Taylor.

EARTHQUAKE2689 03-17-2007 09:22 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[quote=JankySpanky80;288782]Fox does not need to be anywhere but special teams. Skins need a covering SS to mesh with Taylor.[/quote]


ok if we trade down and maybe sign ian scott how about laron landry

GridIron26 03-17-2007 10:08 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[quote=JoeRedskin;288665]Denver - maybe AA for Bly and 2nd tound pick?[/quote]

No, I don't want another good cb in our depth.. Once we have too many good cbs, it's bound for one of them to complain about not playing much..

EARTHQUAKE2689 03-17-2007 10:18 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[quote=GridIron26;288787]No, I don't want another good cb in our depth.. Once we have too many good cbs, it's bound for one of them to complain about not playing much..[/quote]

man what the hell are you talking about carlos rogers right now is average ay best and shawn springs cant stay healthy our best corner to me health wise and skill wise right now cause to be honest if the season were to start today i am kind of edgey on the secondary thats just me

skinsfan_nn 03-18-2007 09:01 AM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[quote=GridIron26;288787]No, I don't want another good cb in our depth.. Once we have too many good cbs, it's bound for one of them to complain about not playing much..[/quote]


Never have to much depth at corner. Rember last year, we had none!

Bly for Arch, and maybe even a late round pick...in a second!

holcknowsbest 03-18-2007 10:21 AM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
hey i finally have another fan of the trade back and nab laron laundry. this guy is a stone cold beast much like taylor but with better cover skills. he played corner two years at lsu but grew out of the position...haha i mean the guys arms are huge! you give me smoot, springs, rogers, taylor, landry, and potentially dre bly? that shores up a lot of holes and makes us extrememly versitle up front where we could afford have those crazy blitz schemes we had in 2003. i think the more secondary help the more creative you can get up front........but i am also a believer in pass rush leads to good coverage, its a two sided argument.....but give me laron landry and i will take the bulk up the secondary argument.

holcknowsbest 03-18-2007 10:25 AM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
plus landry will only make taylor a better player i promise you that, they will feed off of each other. could be some exciting hits and plays made in the secondary next year if this ends up coming true.....my opinion on AA is that he like almost every player in the league is a scheme player and he doesnt fit our scheme....i dont care what we do with him though cause we will eat his money one way or another, so trade him, cut him, keep him i dont care about him.

That Guy 03-18-2007 11:12 AM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
you can't trade down past #10 and get landry, and once again, i REALLY think that that'd be a mistake. PP is good enough, our DL isn't.

4mrusmc 03-18-2007 11:14 AM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
Personally I'm tired of the talk and activity on/about corner backs and safteties. WE NEED HELP ON THE DEFENSIVE LINE!!! Is it me or does it seem that since Gibbs has come back that come draft time, we have not gotten any of our needs addresed.......At all!!!!

Gmanc711 03-18-2007 11:42 AM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[QUOTE=That Guy;288840]you can't trade down past #10 and get landry, and once again, i REALLY think that that'd be a mistake. PP is good enough, our DL isn't.[/QUOTE]

Exactly. PP is perfect type of compliment just like Clark was. We dont need to star safties back there.

dall-assblows 03-18-2007 12:05 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
who is pp

AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace 03-18-2007 12:07 PM

Re: JLC: We should know the status of ARCH by Wednesday.
 
[quote=4mrusmc;288841]Personally I'm tired of the talk and activity on/about corner backs and safteties. WE NEED HELP ON THE DEFENSIVE LINE!!! Is it me or does it seem that since Gibbs has come back that come draft time, we have not gotten any of our needs addresed.......At all!!!![/quote]

well possibly quarterback and cornerback depending on how Rodgers and Campbell play this season


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.09666 seconds with 9 queries