Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   The downside to trading down. (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=17871)

GTripp0012 04-19-2007 07:02 PM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[quote=TenandSix:Unacceptable;299779]To make the comparison a little fairer, let's suppose our two options are trade down to 7 or 8 and get a shot at LL, Adams or Okoye and a 4th rounder, or going down to 10-14 and while getting a second rounder and whoever's left of Carriker, Branch, Anderson. Which would you prefer?[/quote]I'd take the second, but only because that first trade is a horrible offer. If the Falcons aren't going to give us their 2nd to move up to 6, I would expect [I]at least[/I] a third this year and a day 1 selection next year.

If somebody in the 7-10 range wants to trade up, it will cost them a 2nd rounder.

Actually now that I think about it, I'd just tell those teams to "screw off" and keep the No. 6 pick and take Okoye with it. They can take those rip off offers to Arizona.

GoSkins! 04-19-2007 07:38 PM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
the more I think about last season, the more I think that LL should be a consideration. I'm still a believer in the d-line problems being big, but if we could have just generated an average number of turnovers against other teams we could have easily won 4 more games and made the playoffs. We have enough money to sign one more free agent DT and there are a couple out there that could help in a rotation (scott...) or improve things a good bit.

I wonder what the skins are really planning to do????????

pdid5000 04-19-2007 07:46 PM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[quote=jsarno;299305]This is why I try to stay away from draft day comments, cause we do not need a Russell or a Quinn...that would be a waste of a pick unless we planned to trade them.
We have glaring needs, and we need the draft to address these needs.
Not that it matters, but neither of those 2 will be available.[/quote]I'm not saying draft quinn or russell if they fell, teams would want to trade up to our pick to get either one of those guys and would probably give up a lot.

jsarno 04-20-2007 01:24 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[QUOTE=pdid5000;299847]I'm not saying draft quinn or russell if they fell, teams would want to trade up to our pick to get either one of those guys and would probably give up a lot.[/QUOTE]

That's true...and we will see a trade take place if those 2 are still available at our pick...but I doubt that will happen.
I just don't forsee a lot of teams trying to trade up this year...but I could be wrong.

KLHJ2 04-20-2007 01:26 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
Lets face it, we are stuck at 6.

jsarno 04-20-2007 01:47 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[QUOTE=angryssg;299986]Lets face it, we are stuck at 6.[/QUOTE]

I don't think this is a bad thing...if we get Okoye we'll get a truly gifted athlete that can be a force in the middle for us for at least a solid decade.

KLHJ2 04-20-2007 01:49 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[quote=jsarno;299993]I don't think this is a bad thing...if we get Okoye we'll get a truly gifted athlete that can be a force in the middle for us for at least a solid decade.[/quote]

I'm not concerned whatsoever. I have faith that the FO will do the right thing. I like Okoye and Adams

jsarno 04-20-2007 02:06 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[QUOTE=angryssg;299994]I'm not concerned whatsoever. I have faith that the FO will do the right thing. I like Okoye and Adams[/QUOTE]

hahaha...I don't have that faith...but I'm hoping REALLY hard that we don't skrew this one up.

jsarno 04-20-2007 02:08 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
Oh yeah, and we NEED Gaines Adams more than we need Okoye, but I am betting Adams will be gone before our pick.

KLHJ2 04-20-2007 02:26 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[quote=jsarno;300000]Oh yeah, and we NEED Gaines Adams more than we need Okoye, but I am betting Adams will be gone before our pick.[/quote]

Lets say that Hypothetically we got Adams. Which DE does he replace if any? IYO

jsarno 04-20-2007 02:38 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[QUOTE=angryssg;300007]Lets say that Hypothetically we got Adams. Which DE does he replace if any? IYO[/QUOTE]

I'd have him and Carter as the projected starters.

KLHJ2 04-20-2007 02:39 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[quote=jsarno;300011]I'd have him and Carter as the projected starters.[/quote]

That would have been my prediction as well.

jsarno 04-20-2007 02:41 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[QUOTE=angryssg;300013]That would have been my prediction as well.[/QUOTE]
It's the only logical choice...but like I said before, he'll be gone before we have a shot at him.

KLHJ2 04-20-2007 02:46 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[quote=jsarno;300016]It's the only logical choice...but like I said before, he'll be gone before we have a shot at him.[/quote]

He could be, but if he is still there I bet we nab him.

jsarno 04-20-2007 02:50 AM

Re: The downside to trading down.
 
[QUOTE=angryssg;300018]He could be, but if he is still there I bet we nab him.[/QUOTE]

I don't think there is any doubt we will.
I think if both Adams and Okoye are available, we'll take Adams. Otherwise, we'll take Okoye. If both are gone, I think Landry will be our choice for as much as I don't like choice, I know they are thinking it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.31930 seconds with 9 queries