Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=Schneed10;662597]Look for the Saints (Gregg Williams) or the Rams (Spags) to look at him.[/quote]

hmm...Saints have Johnathan Vilma Pro Bowl young MLB, Rams have James Laurinitas young good developing MLB. I don't think he'll go to either of those places.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

We don't need him. They need to draft younger guys and bring in quality UDFAs and FAs to complete the youth movement of the team.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=Schneed10;662613]But then he and Gibbs both later admitted publicly via interviews that they'd like to have that move back, that they should have tried to keep Antonio.[/quote]

Then they got Fletcher :D It's ironic how Fletcher has seemingly outlasted Pierce, you know with Fletch being 3 years older.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;662599]
I said it in the other threads discussing Pierce and i'll repeat myself here. No thanks. Not even for the vet minimum in an [B]uncapped year.[/B][/quote]

At least people are starting to acknowledge the uncapped year when it comes to talking contracts. I've seen some people suggest the vet min like they're some type of stern negotiator (especially at ES). I swear people that suggest the vet min at this point for decent veterans should get the Gibbs head slap.

[YT]MiLwHU4tHlc[/YT]

By the way BHA this wasn't a slight at you. It's obvious you brought up the vet mininimum to prove a point.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=GTripp0012;662565]

Their passing offense is going to keep them in contention for the division regardless, but they certainly are not the Cowboys or the Eagles.[/quote]

LOL...... right ,they are better.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=SkinzzFan;662608]No thanks. He's 32, had a pretty serious neck injury last year and seems to have lost a step. This would be a step back. We need an infusion of youth on both sides of the ball.

[/quote]



.............and now you know why the Giants cut him.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=Giantone;662647]LOL...... right ,they are better.[/quote]Only from an aesthetic perspective. Not in tangible or meaningful ways.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

32 and a bulging disk in the neck, not a great combo to get excited about. We have, what 5 draft picks? Draft a MLB.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

He's fat and he's lost more than a few steps. I doubt he'll ever be a player of significance anymore. As for him coming back here, I say hell no.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

He will probably be on the Patriots next year.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=Ruhskins;662610]Not that I think we should pick him up, but how is picking up Pierce for the vet min any different than picking up some camp scrub?[/quote]

I'd wager that AP is better than HB Blades even with the health issues.

As far as the vet. min, I'm not sure he'd get a big offer even in an uncapped year due to his questionable health issues. He said he wants to stay in the division (like B.Mitch) so why not give him a shot. If it works out, great. If it doesn't then we'll do what we gotta do.

We need to get younger, especially at LB and I don't think signing AP would hinder that draft strategy.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=T.O.Killa;662681]He will probably be on the Patriots next year.[/quote]

Good call actually. I've heard the LB is a big priority for them this offseason.

Also, according to Pierce, his neck has healed to 100%. He said the results of MRI he just had on the neck were "perfect."

[url=http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&id=97&line=167558&spln=1]Fantasy Football Breaking News - Rotoworld.com[/url]

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=Schneed10;662601]
With the cap no longer an issue, don't even bother talking about salary. It's a non-factor. He'd be an upgrade over what we have on the bench.
[/quote]

As long as we're heading towards uncapped seasons, this makes perfect sense to me.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=GridIron26;662593]Is it possible it's because Spags left to coach Rams?[/quote]

Injuries had quite a bit to do with it, though not the only factor.

Re: Giants Release Pierce
 

[quote=GTripp0012;662662]Only from an aesthetic perspective. Not in tangible or meaningful ways.[/quote]


...........riiiiigghhtt.:laughing2